next previous
Up: Spatial distribution of

2. Observations

2.1. Position and aspect geometry of the comet

The mean relative position of the comet with respect to sun and earth during the observational period on April 10, 1986, was r = 1.32 AU and tex2html_wrap_inline1977 AU, respectively; the values were computed from orbit parameters published by Green (1985). The heliocentic radial velocity was tex2html_wrap_inline1979. The closest approach of the comet to the Earth occured on April 11, 1986 (West 1988).

The observation geometry as projected on the celestial plane is shown in Fig. 1 (click here). Superimposed upon a contour plot of the coma of P/Halley this figure contains the projected directions from the cometary nucleus towards north (N), east (E), and the sun (tex2html_wrap_inline1981). The proper motion (PM) of the comet was about tex2html_wrap_inline1983. The position angle (counted N-E-S-W) of the sun was equal to tex2html_wrap_inline1985, and that of the proper motion vector was tex2html_wrap_inline1987. Further details of this figure will be explained in Sect. 2.3 (click here).

The phase angle of P/Halley, i.e. the angle sun-comet-earth, had a value of tex2html_wrap_inline1989. This caused an apparent shortening of the comet tail in the projection on the celestial plane.

  figure197
Figure 1: Coma of P/Halley in the light of tex2html_wrap_inline1945 with superimposed slit positions of the three data sets, and projected directions

2.2. Instrumentation

The observations were performed at the ESO 1 m telescope using the focal reducer of the Observatory Hoher List (Geyer et al. 1979) and instrumental components provided by the Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie. The instrumentation has been described by Jockers et al. (1987).

After having passed the Cassegrain focus of the telescope the beam is recollimated. Filters (imaging mode) or grating prisms (spectrographic mode) are placed in the parallel beam. A camera lens with 50 mm aperture and 140 mm focal length creates a reduced image of the Cassegrain focus at the detector. In imaging mode at the ESO 1 m telescope, the plate scale was tex2html_wrap_inline2003 and the field size about tex2html_wrap_inline2005. In this mode an interference filter centered at 3690 Å with half width (FWHM) of tex2html_wrap_inline2007 was used which shows the cometary coma predominantly in the light of tex2html_wrap_inline1945.

In spectrographic mode a slit plate consisting of 69 slits arranged in five columns was employed in the Cassegrain focal plane as diaphragm to simultaneously obtain spectra from 69 different parts of the coma of P/Halley. The grating prism had 600 grooves per mm and was used in first order. An overlap of individual spectra was avoided by an interlaced arrangement of the slits combined with a slight tilt between the slit direction and the normal with respect to the grating dispersion. At the first order straight-through wavelength (3930 Å) the reciprocal linear dispersion was about tex2html_wrap_inline2011. The exact value of dispersion depended on the positions of the slits relative to the grating prism (Loewen 1970). The spectral resolution was about 4 Å. The focal reducer lens optics and a BG24 filter restricted the effective wavelength range to the interval between approximately 3500 and 4500 Å.

The detector consisted of a two stage proximity image intensifier with bi-alkali cathode (Cromwell et al. 1985) and plates pressed against its output window of 25 mm diameter. The advantage of the image intensifier in comparison with a CCD camera was its better sensitivity in the near-UV and blue spectral ranges where principal cometary emissions are located. The main disadvantage of the intensifier was its large-scale signal-induced background (Cromwell & Smith 1973). The intensifier created halos surrounding the brightest areas and a fixed pattern of small spots. All images were recorded on hypersensitized IIIa-F plates of tex2html_wrap_inline2013 size. Inhomogeneities in the hypersensitation may be present but probably are of minor influence. The weather conditions allowed measurements of high photometric quality.

2.3. Observational method and plates

 

The aim of the observations was to obtain spectra of the comet from different coma areas. In order to know the locations of the slits with respect to the changing plasma tail, first a filter image of P/Halley was obtained in the light of tex2html_wrap_inline1945 using an interference filter centered at 3690 Å with 100 Å full width at half maximum (FWHM). This filter shows the plasma tail best, because the contribution of dust continuum and neutral coma is reduced. Then the interference filter was changed into a BG24 filter and the slit plate was inserted to record the slit positions in double exposure technique on the same plate. After that the focal reducer was used with the grating prism and three multislit spectra were taken with different exposure times in order to enlarge the dynamic range of measurable cometary intensities. This cycle was repeated three times, i.e. altogether three data sets A, B, and C, were recorded, each consisting of four plates. The plates are listed in Table 1 (click here). Pictures of plates F171 and F172 were presented by Jockers et al. (1987). During the cometary exposures the telescope tracking was set to follow the motion of the comet.

In addition a single-exposure direct image of P/Halley without slit marks was recorded on plate F170. In Fig. 1 (click here) a contour plot of this image is shown in logarithmic intensity scale without any background subtracted. The head of P/Halley and the tex2html_wrap_inline1945 ion tail, pointing away from the sun, are visible. In this figure the slit positions for the three data sets, deduced from plates F161, F166, and F171, are represented by short vertical lines. For each data set they are arranged in five columns. The slits are aligned parallel to the north-south direction and their projected size at the comet is about tex2html_wrap_inline2019. The covered field size is about tex2html_wrap_inline2021. The location of the slit pattern is slightly shifted in the data sets A, B, and C. The reason for this is either the bending within the instrument or tracking errors of the telescope. In the data analysis we have assumed that the image of the slits with respect to the comet taken at the beginning of the data set is representative for the location during acquisition of the spectra. For data set C this is proven by the additional exposure F175, on which the position of the slits is identical to F171. Furthermore Fig. 1 (click here) shows trailed background stars and the circular output window of the image intensifier. In the upper part at the left side a large hot spot of the intensifier is visible which appears on all plates.

For absolute calibration a spectrum (F176) of the emission line nebula NGC 6302 (Aller et al. 1981) was recorded. The measured relative line intensities were compared to published absolute intensities, and the derived response function was used to calibrate the cometary spectra. Image F177 shows the location of the slit with respect to the nebula and indicates that the brightest area was missed by about 15 arcsec. CCD spectra of NGC 6302 were taken in July 1982 with the ESO 1.5 m telescope at the brightest part of the nebula and at the slit location indicated by plate F177. These data indicate that spectrum F176 represents well the brightest part of the nebula. In view of the uncertainty in telescope tracking and the small angular extent of the nebula we have assumed that the brightest part of the nebula was recorded in the plate spectrum. If this was not the case, our cometary column densities must be considered as upper limits. As we will see in Sect. 5.1 (click here) our values are indeed higher than the values found in the literature, but by not more than a factor of 2.

 

Plate Object Exposure Instrumentation Airmasstex2html_wrap_inline2023 Data set
Begin Time Factortex2html_wrap_inline2025 Filter SPtex2html_wrap_inline2027 GPtex2html_wrap_inline2027
(UT) (s)
F161 P/Halley 014630 180 IF369 1.994
"tex2html_wrap_inline2031 " 015100 60 BG24 x
F162 P/Halley 015530 1800 .37(6) BG24 x x 1.793
F163 P/Halley 022700 600 BG24 x x 1.640 A
F164 P/Halley 023800 180 2.8(4) BG24 x x 1.594
F166 P/Halley 031630 30 BG24 x
" " 031800 360 IF369 1.390
F167 P/Halley 032600 1800 .36(5) BG24 x x 1.317
F168 P/Halley 040100 600 BG24 x x 1.242 B
F169 P/Halley 041200 180 2.9(6) BG24 x x 1.223
F170 P/Halley 044900 360 IF369 1.144
F171 P/Halley 045600 360 IF369 1.132
" " 050245 30 BG24 x
F172 P/Halley 050500 1806 .35(5) BG24 x x 1.104
F173 P/Halley 053630 600 BG24 x x 1.081 C
F174 P/Halley 054830 180 2.6(5) BG24 x x 1.074
F175 P/Halley 060130 360 IF369 1.064
" " 060900 60 BG24 x
F176 NGC 6302 071700 600 BG24 x x 1.052
F177 NGC 6302 073300 60 BG24 x
" " 073600 360 IF369 1.035
Table 1:   Processed plates obtained on April 10, 1986, and related data


next previous
Up: Spatial distribution of

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)