next previous
Up: Performance of the

3. Angle of arrival characteristics

3.1. Temporal characteristics

3.1.1. Temporal power spectrum

The angle of arrival is defined as being the normal direction relative to the wavefront mean surface, at the point of observation and can be expressed as the mean value of the derivative of the disturbed wavefront at a given aperture (Roddier 1981). The angle tex2html_wrap_inline1691, measured at any given point on the ground, is therefore the convolution of the pupil function with this derivative:
equation1014
where tex2html_wrap_inline1691 is the component of the angle of arrival on the x direction, tex2html_wrap_inline1809 the phase of the disturbed wavefront, and tex2html_wrap_inline1811 the pupil function equal to zero outside the aperture. tex2html_wrap_inline1691 is a random variable that can be characterized by its temporal power spectrum tex2html_wrap_inline1815), where tex2html_wrap_inline1817 is the temporal frequency. To derive the expression of tex2html_wrap_inline1819, the outer scale tex2html_wrap_inline1821 is taken as infinite for convenience. Its size remains a subject of controversy, estimations ended up to values from a few meters (Coulman et al. 1988) to several kilometers (Colavita et al. 1987). Moreover, it is believed to largely depend on meteorological conditions. The temporal power spectrum tex2html_wrap_inline1819 for a one-layer atmosphere can then be written under Taylor hypothesis as follows (Conan 1994):


eqnarray1016
tex2html_wrap_inline1825 is the average wind speed on the x-axis, J1 is the Bessel function of order 1, and f is the module of the spatial frequency tex2html_wrap_inline1833, tex2html_wrap_inline1835.

  figure348
Figure 8: Normalized theoretical power spectrum, tex2html_wrap_inline1837 Hz

Figure 8 (click here) shows the spectrum obtained by numerical integration of Eq. (9) with the following values ascribed to the parameters: aperture diameter D measures 26 cm, Fried parameter r0 10 cm, and wind velocity tex2html_wrap_inline1825 on the x-axis 10 m/s. The temporal power spectrum of the angle of arrival shows a tex2html_wrap_inline1847 power law in the low frequency domain, while in the high frequency domain, the spectrum decreases as tex2html_wrap_inline1849 (Hogge & Butts 1976; Martin 1987; Conan et al. 1995). A power law in tex2html_wrap_inline1851 is mentioned for the tilt by Roddier et al. (1993) and Conan (1994) and it concerns the phase component on Zernike modes z1 and z2. ASSI measures the angle of arrival, expressed as the mean value of the phase first derivative, implying the tex2html_wrap_inline1849 power law. In Fig. 8 (click here), a modulation of the profile appears in the high frequency part of the spectrum. This is due to oscillation induced by the term containing the Bessel function J1 (Conan 1994). Noise appearing over this modulation is likely to be induced by the numerical tool. The spectrum is characterized by a frequency (knee frequency) at which a slope-break marks the separation between the two domains. This knee frequency tex2html_wrap_inline1857 is given by the empirical formula (Conan et al. 1995):
equation1020
For the chosen values of tex2html_wrap_inline1825 and D, tex2html_wrap_inline1857 equals 11.5 Hz. In practice, the parameter tex2html_wrap_inline1825 is the mean velocity within the different layers of the turbulent atmosphere met by the wavefront. Wind direction and amplitude fluctuations from a layer to another can induce change around the knee frequency but the asymptotic behaviors are not modified (Conan et al. 1995). Therefore from experimental power spectrum knee frequency, the average wind speed in the atmosphere can be estimated.

3.3.2. Coherence time

Estimates of the coherence time t0 are available as a result of the Fried parameter and wind velocity estimations. Knowledge of these parameters is essential in determining temporal bandwidth of optical systems and integration times in interferometric imaging. Using wind speed and r0 estimates obtained from angle of arrival temporal spectra, t0 is given by the formula (Nightingale & Buscher 1991; Davis et al. 1995; Davis & Tango 1995): _0=0.314r_0V.

Equation (11) is only valid in the inertial range of Kolmogorov (Roddier 1981).
We must note that the optics community has not concurred over a single definition of the coherence time. Colavita et al. (1987) define a coherence time T0 such that tex2html_wrap_inline1877.

3.2. Spatial characteristics

3.2.1. Image tracking accuracy

Reducing the angle of arrival fluctuations results in stabilization of image position, and the residual position error tex2html_wrap_inline1775 expressed in arcsecond on the sky can be identified as the observable residual motion of the image. In this paper, performance of the system is traced by the standard deviation tex2html_wrap_inline1881 of tex2html_wrap_inline1775, which can be taken as a measure of the tracking accuracy. It can be directly obtained from raw data, or from the integral of the power spectrum.

3.2.2. Fried parameter

Since r0 is directly related to the standard deviation tex2html_wrap_inline1887 of the image motion (angle of arrival) on one axis, it can be written as follows (Tatarski 1971):
equation1023


next previous
Up: Performance of the

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr