next previous
Up: A calibration of

3. The intermediate stars

With the previous calibrations, the stars whose effective temperature lies between 8500 and about 10500 K could not be properly dealt with. This is why we have defined new photometric parameters we call pT and pG, which are sensitive to effective temperature and surface gravity respectively. These parameters have been defined in a similar way as the tex2html_wrap_inline3174 and r ones of the tex2html_wrap_inline3178 photometry, and have about the same sensitivity to the corresponding physical parameters. However, pT and pG are not reddening-free, contrary to tex2html_wrap_inline3184 and r, because the Geneva system lacks an equivalent to the tex2html_wrap_inline3188 index for the intermediate and cool stars. Therefore, the interstellar reddening must be either negligible or known and corrected to make the calibration meaningful. These parameters are defined by:
equation321

equation323
which is equivalent to:
eqnarray325

eqnarray327
and their values for solar-composition Kurucz models (not corrected by standard stars) are represented in Fig. 6 (click here). This figure can be compared with Fig. 4 (click here) of Moon & Dworetsky (1985). If the colour excess E(B2-V1) is known, the correction of the pT and pG parameters has to be done through the relations
equation332

equation334

  figure336
Figure 5: Inverted and corrected grid with solar metallicity for the hot stars. Roughly horizontal lines are those of constant values of the Y photometric parameter, while the vertical ones are lines of constant X parameter. The iso-X lines are separated by an interval of 0.05 magnitudes, while the iso-Y lines are separated by 0.025. For clarity, not all lines are labelled

  figure341
Figure 6: Direct, usual grid showing the (uncorrected) iso-tex2html_wrap_inline3204 and iso-log g lines in the pG vs. pT diagram. These lines are nicely orthogonal, apart from a small region at high gravity and small tex2html_wrap_inline3212. This diagram is quite similar to the tex2html_wrap_inline3214 vs. tex2html_wrap_inline3216 one of the tex2html_wrap_inline3218 photometry

The standard stars used to correct the grid for tex2html_wrap_inline3220 are listed in Table 4 (click here) while those used to correct log g are listed in Table 5 (click here)-8 (click here). The standard stars for tex2html_wrap_inline3224 are taken from essentially the same sources as for the B stars. Table 5 (click here) lists the eclipsing binaries already used by Moon & Dworetsky (1985) while Tables 6 (click here)-8 (click here) give the members of the Orion association, of the Pleiades and of IC 2391 respectively. The colour excess of the stars in Orion was determined from the intrinsic colours of Cramer (1982), and the pT and pG parameters were corrected for it. For the Pleiades, the pT and pG parameters have been corrected for a mean colour excess E(B2-V1) = 0.052 (Nicolet 1981) and for IC 2391, they have been corrected for E(B2-V1) = 0.005 (North & Cramer 1981). For the Pleiades and IC 2391, the fundamental log g values were deduced from the estimated effective temperatures using the isochrones at logtex2html_wrap_inline3240 and 7.7 respectively. The differences between the fundamental tex2html_wrap_inline3244 and logtex2html_wrap_inline3246 and their values interpolated in the (uncorrected) inverted grids from the observed Geneva colours of the standard stars are shown in Figs. 7 and 8 respectively. For effective temperatures, we obtain:
equation360
and for logtex2html_wrap_inline3248:
equation363

  figure370
Figure 7: Difference between interpolated and fundamental tex2html_wrap_inline3250 values vs. fundamental tex2html_wrap_inline3252 for the intermediate stars. The regression line is shown. See Table 4 for the key to the symbols

The inverted and corrected grids themselves are represented for the three metallicities [M/H] = -1, 0, +1 in Figs. 9 (click here)-11 (click here). We show these three diagrams, just to make clear the effect of the metallicity on the tex2html_wrap_inline3256 and logtex2html_wrap_inline3258 estimates. As in the case of the X and Y parameters, we represent the physical parameters logtex2html_wrap_inline3264 vs. tex2html_wrap_inline3266 with the lines of constant pT and pG parameters, rather than the reverse. Note that for these stars, the metallicity is assumed to be known a priori so that the most relevant grid can be used; the colours are not sensitive enough to metallicity to give a significant estimate of it, except perhaps for a few hot Am stars.

  figure383
Figure 8: Difference between interpolated and fundamental logtex2html_wrap_inline3272 values vs. photometric tex2html_wrap_inline3274 for the intermediate stars. The line is the fitted least-squares parabola

The comparison between the fundamental and photometrically determined tex2html_wrap_inline3276 and logtex2html_wrap_inline3278 is shown in Figs. 12 (click here) and 13 (click here) respectively. The residual rms scatter is tex2html_wrap_inline3280  K for the effective temperature, and tex2html_wrap_inline3282  dex (c.g.s.) for the logarithmic surface gravity respectively. As for the hot stars, tex2html_wrap_inline3284 is mostly due to errors in the fondamental data and in the same proportion. This scatter represents the uncertainty in the determination of these physical parameters, but we insist that interstellar reddening must be negligible or corrected for.


next previous
Up: A calibration of

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr