In the previous sections, the changes in the orbital periods of six Algol-type binaries, UW Cyg, RX Hya, AK Ser, AC Tau, UW Vir and VV Vul, are analyzed. It is found that the periods of AK Ser and VV Vul may vary in secular increase, the period of UW Cyg shows a cyclic change. However, the periods of the other three systems, RX Hya, AC Tau and UW Vir vary in complex ways. Periodic variations are found to be superimposed on the long-time increase components.
Algol-type binaries are classified as semi-detached systems whose less massive
components are filling their critical Roche Lobe. Assuming
the conservation of angular momentum, the orbital periods of
Algols should increase during their evolution. The secular
increase of the periods in the five system, RX Hya, AK Ser,
AC Tau, UW Vir and VV Vul can be explained in terms of the
mass transfer from the less massive secondary to the more
massive primary. This is consistent with the semi-detached
configuration of these systems. If such period changes are due
to conservative mass transfer, then by using the parameters
listed in Table 1 in the well-known equation:
![]() |
(23) |
the mass transfer rates for theses binaries are computed and
listed in Table 8. Since no absolute parameters of VV
Vul have been published, its parameters
are estimated during the calculation.
With the spectral type A2/3V given by Halbedel
(1984), the mass of the primary component is estimated to be
,
and considering a typical value of
mass ratio q=0.3 for Algols, the mass of the secondary is
about
.
Stars | P (days) | dP/dt(days/year) | dM/dt(![]() |
RX Hya | 2.281645 |
![]() |
![]() |
AK Ser | 1.922580 |
![]() |
![]() |
AC Tau | 2.043356 |
![]() |
![]() |
UW Vir | 1.8107755 |
![]() |
![]() |
VV Vul | 3.411361 |
![]() |
![]() |
UW Cyg | RX Hya | AC Tau | UW Vir | Units | |
A | 0.0383 | 0.0431 | 0.0191 | 0.0306 | days |
T | 49.3 | 54.3 | 29.8 | 45.9 | years |
![]() |
6.64 | 7.47 | 3.31 | 5.30 | AU |
f(m) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.12 | 1.50 | 0.75 | 0.87 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.21 | 1.62 | 0.80 | 0.94 | ![]() |
![]() |
1.60 | 2.12 | 1.03 | 1.23 | ![]() |
![]() |
3.00 | 3.92 | 1.81 | 2.23 | ![]() |
![]() |
27.0 | 32.8 | 11.5 | 17.2 | ![]() |
![]() |
13.64 | 16.83 | 10.77 | 13.40 | AU |
![]() |
13.43 | 16.59 | 10.74 | 13.20 | AU |
![]() |
12.46 | 15.55 | 10.24 | 12.37 | AU |
![]() |
10.18 | 12.88 | 8.924 | 10.46 | AU |
![]() |
3.257 | 4.433 | 4.044 | 3.904 | AU |
Apart from 6 photoelectric timings for RX Hya, other times of light
minimum analyzed in this paper are visual or photographic, and all
times of light minimum for the six systems measured for the primary minimum.
This may be caused by the fact that the secondary is more difficult to
observe by such methods. The cyclic variations of the O-C residuals
in the four systems, UW Cyg, RX Hya, AC Tau and UW Vir, are only formed
by the times of primary minimum. We do not know
whether the secondary timings follow the same trend of oscillation.
However, for RX Hya and UW Vir, Lucy & Sweeney (1980) have pointed
out that their orbits are circular; for the other two, UW Cyg and
AC Tau, since their orbital periods are small (P<4days), a
strong mutual tidal interaction between the components may have
made their orbits circular. This indicates that the observed cyclic
oscillations in O-C residuals of the four systems are not caused
by apsidal motion. The oscillatory character of the (O-C)
variations in these systems may be result of light time effects
due to the presence of additional bodies. As displayed in Figs. 2,
7 and 9, the sine-like O-C variations for UW Cyg, AC Tau and UW Vir
suggest that their third bodies are moving in circular orbits around
the common centre of the gravity of the three bodies. For RX Hya a
small eccentricity (
)
of the orbit of the third
body is suggested by the observations. Other orbital parameters
are also calculated in Sect. 3.
With the semi-amplitudes of O-C oscillations, the value
can be computed. Then using the following equation:
![]() |
(24) |
we can obtain the mass functions f(m) for the additional
bodies. Taking the absolute parameters listed in Table 1,
the values of the masses and the orbital dimensions of the third
bodies for several different values of
are computed
and listed in Table 9. If we assume that the orbital
inclination is perpendicular to the visual line (i.e.,
), the values of the masses of the
additional bodies are computed to be
m3=1.12, 1.50, 0.75and 0.87
for UW Cyg, RX Hya, AC Tau and UW Vir.
At this case the orbital radii of the third bodies should
be:
a3=13.64, 16.83, 10.77, 13.40AU respectively.
As listed in Table 9, for RX Hya, the minimum mass of the
third body is
which is smaller than
the corresponding value
derived by Vyas &
Abhyankar (1989) from their orbital period analysis. If the
third component is main sequence star as the components of
RX Hya, the computed mass will correspond to a spectral type
G1-3 which is nearly close to the spectral type of this system
(F1). This indicates that the spectral line of the third body
should be visible in the spectrum and the third star should
contribute to the total luminosity of the system. In the
absence of such evidences, the presence of the third body
needs further study.
For UW Cyg, the minimum mass of the third body (
)
corresponds to a spectral type G5-7 which is also
close to the spectral type of this system (F0). From the
spectroscopic and photoelectric observations, we should be able
to find the presence of the third body. In the cases of AC Tau
and UW Vir, since the values
and
are also the minimum masses of the third bodies, there is a possibility
to see their spectral lines in the spectra. However, to the
best of my knowledge, no spectroscopic and photometric studies of
the three systems, UW Cyg, AC Tau and UW Vir,
have been published.
This emphasizes the urgent need of future photometric and
particularly spectroscopic observations to decide on the
hypothetical third bodies.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks are given to Prof. F. van't Veer for his useful comments and improvements of the author's English writing. The author also thanks the supports from the Chinese Natural Science Foundation and from the 973 scheme.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)