![]() |
(14) |
the residuals
of these timings are computed.
These
valuse are listed in the fourth and ninth
columns of Table 5 and are plotted in Fig. 6. One
photographic minimum 2445057.522 shows large deviation from the
general O-C trend formed by other points in Fig. 6. This
point was not considered further in the discussion of the period
variation.
As displayed in Fig. 6, we can conclude that the orbital
period of the system is variable, and its variation is complex.
Since the general trend of the
diagram may show a
roughly parabolic distribution indicating a secular increase
in the period, a least-squares solution of the
values yields the following ephemeris:
![]() |
(15) |
where the coefficient of the square term represents the rate
of change of the period. This ephemeris can be used for the
estimation of future times of minima. A continuous period
increase of
days/cycle =
days/year is calculated which is
equivalent to a period increase of 6.1 s/century. As in the
case of RX Hya, the secular increase only indicates the general
trend of the
diagram without describing any particular
characteristic.
![]() |
Figure 6: The O-C diagram of AC Tau. Also given in solid line is its description by a quadratic ephemeris |
The
residuals from the quadratic ephemeris (15)
are also listed in Table 5 and displayed in Fig. 7. The
values in Fig. 7 clearly suggest a periodic
oscillation. With the least-squares method, the following periodic
ephemeris is obtained:
![]() |
(16) |
which can describe the general trend of the
values wery well (solid line in Fig. 7). This
ephemeris tell us a cyclic variation with a period
of about T=29.8year and an amplitude of about
.
The cyclic variation of the O-C curve
indicates that the orbital period varies in a periodic
way.
![]() |
Figure 7: Residuals of AC Tau from the quadratic ephemeris and their description by a periodic function |
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)