A luminosity calibration for B9-A2 supergiants by Rosendhal ([1974])
based on the strength of the Si II lines at 6347 and 6371 Å gives
log
.
A similar value, log
,
follows from our spectroscopic estimate (Sect. 3.2). As a consequence
the star is located close to the line of LBVs in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram
(Stothers & Chin [1994]). The bright H
line also suggests
a high luminosity for the star as was pointed out by Talavera & Gómez
de Castro ([1987]). Indeed, only those A-type supergiants with
mag, such as HD160529 and HD168607, display so strong
(EW
Å) H
lines in emission (Fig. 6a).
As it is seen in Fig. 6b, the wings of the H
line in
AS314 are narrower than those of the Kurucz ([1994]) model
atmospheres for
K and log g = 1.5 and wider than
those of HD160529 (log g = 0.55, Stahl et al. [1995]). These
two values can be adopted as initial estimates for an upper and lower
level of the surface gravity for AS314. Since the star displays small
photometric and spectroscopic variations, these estimates seem to be reliable.
Our result for the spectral type determination, which comes mainly from the
quantitative spectroscopy as the most reliable method, in combination with
such a high luminosity lead to the MK type A0 Ia+ for AS314.
de Jager & Nieuwenhuijzen ([1987]) give
K for
stars of such a spectral type.
Thus, summarizing all the above estimates, we finally adopt the object's
mag, which corresponds to
log
,
,
and implies
kpc.
These
and
match the evolutionary track of a
star (Schaller et al. [1992]) and imply log
g = 1.3,
which is located within the above limits.
![]() |
Figure 5: Spectral line variations in different spectra of AS314. The 1997 spectrum is shown by a solid line, the 1998 spectrum by a long-dashed line, the 1999 spectrum by a short-dashed line |
In order to determine the temperature of the dusty envelope we
model the overall observed SED with the DUSTY code (Ivezic et al. [1999]), which solves the radiation transfer problem in
spherical dusty envelopes. In the model we used the optical properties of
amorphous carbon
(Hanner [1988]), which is expected to form around evolved luminous
stars (Bjorkman [1998]). The density distribution was assumed to be
proportional to the inversed square distance from the star. A good fit
to the observed SED was obtained for a dust temperature of 100 K at the
inner envelope boundary and the overall optical depth of the envelope of
0.03. The corresponding distance of the hottest grains from the star was
found to be 0.2 pc.
The calculated SED virtually passes through the observed data points and is,
therefore, not displayed in Fig. 2. However, the lack of the IR
data (such as information about the spectral properties in the
m
region) does not allow us to constrain the envelope model better.
The dust temperature is close to that derived for the galactic LBVs
HR Car (170 K), AG Car and WRA 751 (130 K, de Winter et al.
[1992]). The lower temperature found for AS314 suggests that an event
(perhaps, an outburst), which might have led to the dust formation occurred
earlier than in the other quoted LBVs.
The first three lines of the Balmer series in AS314 have PCyg-type profiles,
which may be interpreted as a consequence of spherical mass loss, while
their broad wings suggest a noticeable amount of electron scattering in the
stellar wind.
Comparison of the object's H
line profile with those of other
LBVs with similar
shows that both red wing and the absorption
component are narrower in AS314 (see Fig. 6a). This implies a smaller
terminal velocity (
)
and a smaller electron scattering optical depth
(
)
for AS314. Since
for HD160529 is about 90 kms-1(Sterken et al. [1991]), this value may be suggested as an upper level of
for AS314.
The relationship between the wind momentum and luminosity for supergiants
(Kudritzki [1998]) being applied to the parameters of AS314, as
derived above, gives an estimate of the mass loss rate,
.
In order to constrain the parameters of the object's stellar wind
we tried to model its Balmer line profiles under assumptions of spherical
geometry and
-velocity law using a radiation transfer Sobolev
code by Pogodin ([1986]). Electron scattering was
treated in a simplified way as described in Castor et al. ([1970]),
which is reasonable given a small expected
.
![]() |
Figure 6:
a) Comparison of the H![]() ![]() ![]() |
The best fit parameters are as follows:
yr-1,
,
kms-1,
w0 = 0.02 (wind velocity at the
photospheric level in units of
), and
.
The agreement of the calculated and observed profiles is not perfect (see
Fig. 7) and reflects the simplifications adopted (spherical symmetry,
the electron scattering treatment) as well as difficulties of using the
Sobolev method for small velocity gradients. Nevertheless, the derived wind
parameters are in reasonable agreement with those of the other hypergiants
quoted here.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)