FGC 242 Our lower-velocity detection is likely due to a confusion
with IC 200,
away at
km s-1 (RC3); our weak
higher-velocity
detection may be due to interference.
FGC 245 Our detection is likely a spurious feature due to recurrent bandpass structure (see Sect. 3.1.1).
FGC 284 Our apparent detection is likely due to a confusion with
CGCG 462-006, at
km s-1 (Giovanelli & Haynes 1993)
and with a projected
distance of
from
FGC 284.
FGC 511 Our detection may result from confusion with
the Sb spiral NGC 1681, located
away, with
km s-1 (Huchra et al. 1993),
although that galaxy has no published H I detection.
In observations obtained with a higher-velocity
search range, a second
marginal detection is present at the edge of the bandpass,
near
km s-1, with
km s-1 and
Jy km s-1.
FGC 567 We see
marginal features near
km s-1 in spectra obtained using two
different autocorrelator configurations, but both
features are quite weak.
FGC 598 The optical counterpart of FGC 598 appears
extraordinarily diffuse and of low surface brightness on the DSS.
The line we detect is likely a result of
confusion with the Sa galaxy UGC 3679,
away at
km s-1 (RC3) and/or the Sb spiral CGC 205-017,
away,
at
km s-1 (Marzke et al. 1996), although CGCG 205-017 has no
previously reported H I detection.
An additional marginal detection is present
in our spectrum at
km s-1 with
km s-1 and
Jy km s-1.
FGC 613 Our possible detection of FGC 613 is not
corroborated by Giovanelli et al. (1997), who report
km s-1 for FGC 613. One possibility is that
their detection resulted from a confusion
with the Sab
spiral UGC 3774 (
km s-1; RC3),
from FGC 613, as the
peak flux they report for FGC 613 should have been
well above our detection limit.
UGC 3716 Our detected line profile is peculiar, probably
due to a blended detection.
A number of galaxies with redshifts similar to our
detected line are present in this region, and
two of these galaxies would have overlapped in our
beam: UGC 3718, with
km s-1,
away,
and CGC 205-025 with
km s-1,
away. Their redshifts were
determined optically (Marzke et al. 1996), but both have early-type
morphologies and neither has previously been
detected in H I, hence it is unknown whether we have
detected one of these objects, or whether UGC 3716 is an
H I-rich member
of this group.
FGC 904 Our observations may be contaminated by
the Sa spiral NGC 2907 lying
away with
km s-1,
W20=510 km s-1, and S=6.1 Jy km s-1 (Richter & Huchtmeier 1987).
UGC 5550 Our detected H I feature is quite weak, although
its velocity
is close to the optical redshift of
km s-1 reported by
Makarov et al. (1999).
FGC 1248 The weak feature we observe does not correspond
in velocity to the optical redshift of
km s-1
measured for FGC 1248 by Makarov et al. (1999); no H I line feature
is apparent in our spectrum near the Makarov et al. velocity.
FGC 1359 Our marginal detection may be due to
contamination from the E? galaxy
MCG-01-31-003,
away, with
km s-1
(Da Costa et al. 1998), although
MCG-01-31-003 has no previously reported detection in H I.
FGC 1563 A matching off-beam feature suggests the emission feature may be due to interference.
ESO 576-047 Our detection is very near the edge of the bandpass and may be spurious.
UGC 7553 Our line profile is likely blended or
confused with the S0 galaxy CGCG014-041
away at
km s-1 (Metcalfe et al. 1989),
although CGCG 014-041 has no
previously reported reported
detection in H I. We also marginally detect an additional source at
km s-1 with
km s-1 and
Jy km s-1.
UGC 8538 A strong off-beam detection or interference overlaps with our observed line profile, hence our source flux and linewidth are lower limits, making the validity of our detection questionable. The off-beam source appears strong and narrow, and no optical catalogued galaxy appears at the location of the off-beam observations; however both the on- and off-beam sources were present in observations obtained on four different days over a one-month period.
FGC 1793 Our lower-velocity detection is likely due to
confusion with the dwarf ESO 580-008,
from FGC 1793,
with
km s-1 (Maia et al. 1993);
the second source is likely a confusion with
the SBc spiral NGC 5716,
away, with
km s-1 (RC3).
FGC 1903 Our detection appears to be due to a confusion
with UGC 9855, an Im galaxy
from FGC 1903 with
km s-1 (Schneider et al. 1992).
FGCE 1446 Inspection of the DSS reveals a number of other
galaxies present in our beam, including the Sb spiral ESO 596-010 at
km s-1,
away (Fisher et al. 1995).
Our detection is likely due to a
confusion with this galaxy,
although ESO 596-010 has not been previously detected in H I.
ESO 342-044 This region contains a galaxy group, and
numerous other galaxies were present in our
beam, including ESO 342-045, a spiral with
km s-1 (RC3),
from ESO 342-044. Our H I detection is mostly likely due to
a confusion waith this object.
FGC 2506 A marginal feature is seen at the edge of our
bandpass; if real, it may correspond to either a detection of FGC 2506, or to
UM165m, a galaxy
away with
km s-1 (Terlevich et al. 1991) but with no
previously reported H I detection.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)