next previous
Up: An HI survey of


Subsections

3 Observations

3.1 The Nançay observations

In total, new observations of 437 flat galaxy candidates were undertaken using the Nançay Decimetric Radio Telescope and 1024-channel autocorrelator spectrometer between May 1996 and January 1999.

The Nançay telescope is a meridian transit-type instrument with an effective collecting area of roughly 7000 m2. At 21-cm, the FWHP beam size is $3\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$ }6$ E-W$\times\ge$ $22\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$ }0$ N-S. Because of the design of the Nançay telescope, the N-S beam diameter changes as a function of the declination of the source (see Fig. 1).

Observations were obtained in total power mode, using consecutive pairs of two-minute on-source and two-minute off-source integrations. Off-source integrations were generally taken $\sim20'$ E of the target position. Tracking was limited to 0.75-3.0 hours per source per day. Due to scheduling constraints, total integration times for each target varied, but were typically a few hours per galaxy. Typically system temperatures were $\sim40$ K.

Two different autocorrelator configurations were used to obtain the Nançay spectra. The bulk of the observations were obtained in a single (horizontal) polarization mode, with the autocorrelator divided into four banks of 256 channels each and a small overlap in frequency between consecutive banks. The total bandpass was $\sim23$ MHz, yielding a channel spacing of $\sim5.3$ km s-1, for an effective resolution of $\sim6.3$ km s-1. Galaxies observed with this set-up were initially observed over a search range from 341-5299 km s-1. Most targets were also observed over higher-velocity search ranges, typically from 5023-10138 km s-1. For a small number of targets, observations were obtained with a bandpass of $\sim $12 MHz and channel spacings of $\sim $2.6 km s-1. In these cases the effective search ranges were 324-2900 km s-1 or 5006-7664 km s-1.

   
3.1.1 Reduction and analysis of the Nançay data

Our Nançay spectra were reduced using the SIR spectral line reduction packages available at the Nançay site. With this software we fitted and subtracted baselines (third-order or lower polynomials) and applied a declination-dependent conversion factor to convert from units of $T_{\rm sys}$ to flux density in millijanskys. The $T_{\rm sys}$-to-mJy conversion factor is determined through regular monitoring of strong continuum sources by the Nançay staff. This procedure yields a relative calibration accuracy of $\sim $15%. In addition, we applied a scaling factor of 1.26 to all Nançay spectra to derive our absolute flux scale (see Matthews et al. 1998a).

Peak fluxes, integrated fluxes, velocity widths, and radial velocities were measured for all detected sources using IDL software written by one of us. Our measured parameters are presented in Table 1. Spectra of all the detected galaxies are presented in Fig. 2.

In order to increase signal-to-noise to a level suitable for high-quality measurements, in most cases we smoothed the data to a resolution of $\sim $16 km s-1 before performing the line measurements. In general smoothing permits a better determination of the systemic velocity, although it results in a systematic overestimation in the measured linewidths (see e.g., Giovanelli et al. 1997). For this reason, we have derived a correction to our measured linewidths to account for instrumental resolution and smoothing (see below).

We determined peak fluxes in the detected lines using the mean of the two strongest channels, after smoothing. Velocity widths were measured interactively, by moving the cursor outward from the profile center. Radial velocities were defined to be the centroid of the two 20% peak maximum points on the line profile. Total fluxes were measured by integrating the area under the line profile on the baseline-subtracted spectrum.

In a number of observations obtained at Nançay during January 1997 spurious features with velocity widths of $\sim $200-300 km s-1 intermittently appeared in our spectra near $V_{\rm h}\sim1300$ km s-1. Their cause is unknown. These features generally had intensities of a few tens of millijanskys, and thus mimicked the appearance of a real extragalactic source. As a result, we generally treat apparent detections near $V_{\rm h}\approx1300$ km s-1 as marginal unless they were subsequently confirmed by independent observations (see Notes to Tables 1 & 2 in Appendices A & B).

3.2 The Green Bank observations

Observations of 54 FGC targets were carried out in October 1997 using the NRAO[*] 140-ft telescope located in Green Bank, West Virginia. The primary goal of the Green Bank observations was to observe high-priority FGCE targets (e.g., objects of large angular size) located between declinations $-38^{\circ}$ and $-44.5^{\circ}$ (i.e., which were too far south to be observed at Nançay) or which otherwise could not be observed at Nançay due to scheduling constraints. In addition, we observed at Green Bank a few sources that we had previously detected at Nançay in order to provide an external check on flux calibration.

Observations at Green Bank were carried out using the 1.3-1.8 GHz receiver and Mark IV 1024-channel autocorrelator spectrometer. The autocorrelator was divided into two orthogonally polarized banks of 512 channels, each with a 20 MHz total bandpass, but with center velocities offset by $\sim $500 km s-1. Typically, search ranges were approximately 600-4700 km s-1 and 1100-5200 km s-1 in the respective banks, although a few targets were observed over slightly different velocity ranges (see Table 3). Channel widths were $\sim $8.4 km s-1, for an effective velocity resolution of $\sim $10 km s-1.

Observations were obtained in total power mode using a series of six-minute on-, and six-minute off-source integrations. The off-source observations were obtained at locations offset $6^{\rm m}42^{\rm s}$ west of the target position. Total integration times were typically 1.25 hours per source. Observations were made after sunset to avoid solar interference in the sidelobes. At 1400 MHz, the 140-ft telescope has a FWHP beamwidth of $\sim $21'. System temperatures ranged from 18 K for observations near zenith, to 28-35 K for observations at $\delta<-40^{\circ}$. Absolute flux calibration was accomplished through the monitoring of both line calibrators (from Davies et al. 1989 and van Zee et al. 1997) and continuum calibration sources (selected from the VLA Calibration Manual[*]) several times per night. These two methods generally agreed to within better than 5%. The mean derived calibration factor varied by $\sim\pm$3.5% over the course of 8 nights.


Table 2. Marginal and questionable detections

Galaxy Name

$\alpha$(B1950.0) $\delta$(B1950.0) Type a$\times$b rms $F_{\rm max}$ W20 W50 $V_{\rm h}$ $\sigma(V)$ S $\sigma(S)$ S/N Notes

                           

ESO 243-016

00 55 01.8 -42 56 24 Scd 1.29$\times$0.11 12.8 29 239 192 3985 12 2.9 1.8 2.3 G

FGCE 124

01 03 37.9 -19 08 17 Sd 0.71$\times$0.09 3.43 9.4 180 146 7625 24 0.88 0.66 2.8  

UGC 778

01 11 25.5 +49 57 39 Sd 1.10$\times$0.11 3.34 11 266 224 6867 22 1.4 0.7 3.3  

FGC 242*a

02 03 33.2 +30 52 50 Sd 1.03$\times$0.11 3.92 12 172 166 3891 10 1.2 0.8 3.1 *

FGC 242*b

... ... ... ... 3.69 11 142 126 6051 15 0.79 0.62 3.0 *
                             

FGC 284

02 20 04.6 +17 35 17 Sd 1.01$\times$0.10 7.5 35 222 200 4128 8 4.2 1.2 4.7 G,*

FGC 392

03 08 28.4 +34 49 59 Sd 1.18$\times$0.11 3.81 9.9 310 231 4566 - 1.3 0.9 2.6  

FGCE 454

04 59 29.6 -22 19 37 Sd 0.65$\times$0.09 3.00 8.0 289 275 1385 16 1.3 0.8 2.7  

FGC 511

04 49 26.2 -06 01 51 Sd 0.83$\times$0.08 3.99 21 166 124 2749 14 2.3 0.8 5.2 d,*

FGCE 527

05 44 08.4 -17 24 10 Sd 1.19$\times$0.12 3.42 6.7 172 152 5738 26 0.74 0.71 2.0  
                             
FGCE 554 06 00 41.0 -28 04 07 Sd 0.76$\times$0.08 2.96 6.1 118 93 6417 27 0.56 0.56 2.1  

FGC 567

06 24 31.2 +56 13 32 Sd 1.10$\times$0.10 2.92 8.5 284 201 5293 35 1.3 0.7 2.9 *

FGC 598

07 03 28.6 +44 44 36 Sd 0.95$\times$0.11 2.76 12 239 181 5867 20 1.8: 0.7 4.2 *

UGC 3716*

07 06 58.0 +39 47 13 Sd 0.91$\times$0.10 2.34 16 398 312 6359 15 3.4 0.7 6.8 c,p,*

FGC 613

07 13 20.5 +33 02 37 Scd 1.03$\times$0.13 4.12 11 186 173 6392 15 1.1 0.8 2.6 *
                             
FGC 647 07 36 35.6 +62 45 55 Sd 0.83$\times$0.10 3.88 9.9 314 155 6577 55 1.3 0.9 2.6  

UGC 4068

07 49 33.4 +40 18 14 Sd 1.48$\times$0.18 2.35 4.9 159 138 8263 25 0.54 0.49 2.1  

FGC 781

08 37 46.8 +57 49 27 Sd 0.72$\times$0.09 5.38 12 119 97 2340 24 1.1 1.0 2.2  

FGC 904

09 29 32.5 -16 27 05 Sd 1.49$\times$0.12 2.90 20 287 261 2180 8 3.8 0.8 6.9 c,p,*

FGCE 768*a

09 41 49.0 -24 58 20 Sd 0.86$\times$0.12 4.05 11 174 111 2504 32 1.1 0.8 2.8  
                             

FGCE 768*b

... ... ... ... 4.05 9.4 202 190 3775 17 1.4 1.0 2.3  

ESO 498-023

09 42 15.4 -23 43 21 Sd 1.12$\times$0.11 3.07 8.6 242 182 5778 31 0.97 0.65 2.8  

UGC 5550

10 14 03.7 +64 38 19 Sdm 1.01$\times$0.10 5.47 14 237 199 4507 27 1.7 1.2 2.5 *

FGC 1136

10 46 04.6 +19 24 05 Sd 0.90$\times$0.10 4.37 14 71 57 1856 12 0.67 0.55 3.2  

FGC 1248

11 24 22.8 +70 45 15 Sd 0.92$\times$0.11 3.86 11 260 251 6934 12 1.6 1.0 2.8 b,*
                             
FGC 1359 12 02 32.4 -03 35 52 Sd 1.01$\times$0.13 2.84 6.4 278 236 5712 33 1.1 0.7 2.2 *

UGC 7553*

12 24 29.6 -01 14 27 Sdpec 1.18$\times$0.11 2.11 12 371 332 8820 13 2.3 0.6 5.5 c,*

FGC 1563

13 05 36.3 -15 58 19 Sdm 0.95$\times$0.12 3.10 11 185 149 2790 19 1.1 0.6 3.5 i,*

ESO 576-047

13 21 28.8 -17 38 24 Sd 1.25$\times$0.10 3.91 17 ... ... $\ge$6801 ... ... ... 4.4 e,*

UGC 8538

13 31 07.7 +46 05 33 Sd 1.41$\times$0.11 4.14 21 $\ge$133 $\ge$116 1327 9 $\ge$2.4 0.9 5.0 i,*
                             
FGC 1647 13 35 47.3 +08 26 30 Sd 0.95$\times$0.10 2.99 6.4 84 56 2662 28 0.51 0.53 2.1  

FGC 1660

13 41 07.0 +22 20 51 Sdm 1.08$\times$0.10 3.09 9.6 320 275 8134 24 1.2 0.7 3.1  

FGC 1680

13 50 39.7 +68 37 15 Sdm 0.84$\times$0.09 6.31 18 191 165 3865 20 1.6 1.2 2.8  

FGC 1793*a

14 38 25.6 -17 25 20 Sd 0.65$\times$0.09 3.16 32 78 63 3422 4 2.2 0.5 10.3 *

FGC 1793*b

... ... ... ... 3.16 36 240 106 4140 11 5.0 0.7 11.5 *
                             
ESO 580-019 14 42 50.6 -22 14 57 Sd 0.95$\times$0.10 4.26 10 163 131 5638 - 0.96 0.82 2.4  

FGC 1865

15 12 02.2 +37 31 14 Sdm 0.95$\times$0.10 2.78 10 246 235 8988 10 0.94 0.53 3.7  

FGC 1869

15 12 34.2 +06 06 52 Sdm 0.83$\times$0.09 2.55 8.1 83 36 6870 24 0.48 0.39 3.2  

FGC 1903

15 25 07.1 +66 23 16 Sdm 0.93$\times$0.11 4.56 33 207 146 3459 12 4.5 1.2 7.2 *

FGC 2028

16 20 17.5 +63 14 13 Sd 1.01$\times$0.08 4.60 9.1 207 174 3075 33 1.4 1.1 2.0  
                             
FGC E1446* 20 12 04.9 -20 00 23 Sd 0.73$\times$0.07 4.68 22 234 225 4914 7 3.6 1.2 4.6 c,*

ESO 596-026

20 20 13.8 -21 21 14 Sd 1.03$\times$0.11 1.83 7.2 285 ... 8393 46 0.76 0.37 4.0  

ESO 342-044

21 22 36.3 -40 20 25 Scd 1.14$\times$0.11 17.4 50 468 449 5034 12 12.6 4.0 2.9 G,*

ESO 407-012

23 12 27.5 -33 31 30 Irr 1.10$\times$0.11 2.92 10 153: 80: 5999 27 0.65 0.46 3.5 *

FGC 2506

23 29 18.6 -01 06 05 Sdm 0.99$\times$0.11 4.00 14 ... ... $\ge$5200 ... ... ... ... e,*

                           


Unfortunately our Green Bank run was plagued by recurrent radio frequency interference (RFI) at a range of frequencies throughout our observed spectral range. Approximately 15% of our scans in both polarizations were affected. Most of the interference caused either high-amplitude ringing throughout a large fraction of the bandpass, or else produced strong, broad spectral features mimicking astronomical signals. Some of the interference was traced to on-site sources (which were located and eliminated), while other sources remained unidentified. Effects appeared to be most severe during observations of targets near the horizon.

In addition to the interference problems, during a night following a substantial rainfall, intermittent baseline structures occurred in a number of our spectra, which could not be removed by fitting sinusoids or low-order polynomial baselines. As a result, a significant number of additional scans had to be discarded. In total, $\sim $25% of our Green Bank scans were unusable due to interference and/or bandpass structure. As a result, the rms noise in our Green Bank spectra was typically $~\rlap{$>$ }{\lower 1.0ex\hbox{$\sim$ }}$3 times higher than in our Nançay data.

3.2.1 Reduction and analysis of the Green Bank observations

The Green Bank data were reduced using the line version of the NRAO Unipops spectral analysis package. Baselines (typically first or second-order polynomials) were subtracted from individual scans and the scans for each object were then averaged. Scans contaminated by significant interference or strong residual baseline structure were not included in the final averages. Peak fluxes, line widths, radial velocities, and integrated fluxes were measured for detected sources in the manner described for the Nançay data, but using routines written in Unipops. All measurements of the Green Bank data were performed on unsmoothed spectra.


next previous
Up: An HI survey of

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)