next previous
Up: A ROSAT PSPC catalogue region


Subsections

3 The catalogue of discrete X-ray sources

Table 2 with the full SMC catalogue is available electronically and contains the following information for each X-ray source: (1) source number, (2) likelihood of existence (maximum value from the five detection energy bands) ML $_{\rm exi}$, (3) vignetting corrected net exposure, (4) and (5) source coordinates RA and Dec (J2000.0) derived from observation and energy band with smallest position error, (6) statistical 90% confidence error on the X-ray position with an additioanl systematic uncertainty of about 7 $^{\prime\prime}$, (7) PSPC 0.1 - 2.4 keV count rate and error, (8) and (9) hardness ratios (defined as HR1 = (H - S)/(S+H) and HR2 = (H2 - H1)/(H1+H2) where S, H, H1 and H2 denote count rates in the 0.1-0.4 keV, 0.5-2.0 keV, 0.5-0.9 keV and 0.9-2.0 keV bands, respectively; not calculated in cases where not all required count rates are available), (10) source extent from same detection as source position, (11) likelihood for the extent, (12) ROSAT observation identifier (a "+" at the end marks merged observations), (13) off-axis angle, (14) distance to detector window support structure or detector rim (WSS), (15) number of nearest (within 60 $^{\prime\prime}$) source in KPFH99 (see Sect. 3.1) and (16) remark (cf. Table 1 in HP99). We note here that the count rates given in KPFH99 and here can considerably differ for sources repeatedly covered by PSPC observations. Since the main goal of this work is to identify sources, we selected the detection with smallest error on the X-ray position which may result from a different PSPC observation not used by KPFH99.

The spatial distribution of the 517 PSPC sources in the catalogue is shown in Fig. 3. Haberl & Pietsch (1999) have used the LMC catalogue to identify known sources and classify unknown sources according to the properties of the identified samples. Again we follow the same procedures for the SMC region.

 

 
Table 2: Excerpt of the catalogue of 517 ROSAT PSPC sources from a 6$^\circ $$\times $6$^\circ $ field centered on the SMC

2   3   4 5 7 8 9 10   11  

No
ML $_{\rm exi}$ Exp. RA Dec r90 Count Rate HR1 HR2 Extent ML $_{\rm ext}$
    [s]    (J2000.0) [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [cts s-1]     [ $^{\prime\prime}$]  

49
12.2 15341 01 02 49.5 -71 37 09 42.6 3.41e-03 $\pm$ 4.4e-03 1.00 $\pm$ 0.84 -1.00 $\pm$ 1.69 0.0 0.0
50 47.1 14862 00 55 47.3 -71 38 03 10.0 4.90e-03 $\pm$ 7.4e-04 -0.22 $\pm$ 0.15 -0.21 $\pm$ 0.22 0.0 0.0
51 25.7 15176 00 59 41.7 -71 38 15 14.5 2.94e-03 $\pm$ 6.1e-04 -1.00 $\pm$ 0.12   0.0 0.0
52 326.6 9397 00 36 56.9 -71 38 15 17.5 3.86e-02 $\pm$ 2.8e-03 1.00 $\pm$ 0.25 0.38 $\pm$ 0.06 3.4 19.1
53 21360.4 3470 00 59 11.3 -71 38 45 2.8 8.38 $\pm$ 5.0e-02 0.48 $\pm$ 0.01 0.17 $\pm$ 0.01 1.1 14.5

                   

   12
13  14  15     16

  ROR
$\delta$ $d_{\rm rib}$ KPFH99 Remark
  [$^\prime $] [FWHM]    

500250p
29 1.3 0 AGN? 13 cm
400300p+ 13 6.0 109 fg Star F5/F6V, HD 5572 (SIM)
400300p+ 6 20.6 141 SSS? RXJ0059.6-7138, PN LIN357 (KPFH99)
400299p+ 36 1.8 19 AGN? [hard] [nonstar] Radio SMC B0034-7155 (FJW97) 13 cm jets
500142p 32 4.3 0 HMXB Be/X RXJ0059.2-7138, soft pulsar (H94, SC96)

       



  \begin{figure}
{
\psfig{figure=smc_image+cat.ps,width=170mm,clip=,bblly=350pt,bbury=730pt,bbllx=100pt,bburx=480pt} }
\end{figure} Figure 3: Distribution of the 517 X-ray sources detected with the ROSAT PSPC. The source positions are plotted on a weak grey scale image (0.1 - 2.4 keV) similar to Fig. 1 for orientation


 

 
Table 3: PSPC sources detected with the Einstein IPC

  2 4 5 6         7

No
  WW92 d  r90 PSPC Count Rate IPC Rate Remarks
  No Name [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [cts s-1] [cts s-1]  

8
23 0049.0-7125 15.5 20.2 2.04e-01 $\pm$ 1.1e-02 0.046 fg Star F5V, HD 5028 (WW92)
47 43 0056.8-7152 2.6 1.3 3.68e-01 $\pm$ 4.9e-03 0.047 SSS 1E0056.8-7154, PN LIN333 (KP96)
94 32 0051.3-7213 62.2 30.2 1.21e-02 $\pm$ 2.1e-03 0.006  
107 51 0102.3-7218 13.4 0.7 2.24 $\pm$ 2.1e-02 0.807 SNR 0102-72.3 (WW92,FPW99) 13 cm
114 41 0056.2-7219 58.3 7.9 3.03e-03 $\pm$ 5.0e-04 0.002 HMXB? AXJ0058-72.0, pulsar (YK98a)

121
46 0059.8-7220 37.6 7.2 8.93e-03 $\pm$ 8.5e-04 0.003  
125 54 0104.5-7222 52.1 3.6 3.36e-02 $\pm$ 1.5e-03 0.008 SNR 0104-72.3 (WW92) 13 cm
143 50 0101.5-7225 17.5 3.4 1.54e-02 $\pm$ 9.6e-04 0.013 HMXB Be/X SAXJ0103.2-7209, pulsar (ISC98, HS94,CO99)
148 44 0057.7-7226 1.4 3.2 5.73e-02 $\pm$ 1.7e-03 0.024 SNR 0057-72.2 (YTK91,WW92) 13 cm
157 36 0053.7-7227 20.9 2.3 2.74e-02 $\pm$ 1.2e-03 0.005 AGN? Radio SMC B0053-7227 (FHW98) 13 cm jets

160
53 0103.8-7227 49.0 7.8 1.63e-02 $\pm$ 1.0e-03 0.011 [hard] associated with DEM S128? (FHP00)
162 45 0059.1-7227 44.5 2.3 2.67e-02 $\pm$ 1.1e-03 0.006 [hard] G star identification in SCC99 unlikely
163 53 0103.8-7227 76.9 6.6 6.86e-03 $\pm$ 6.7e-04 0.011 HMXB Be/X AXJ0105-722, pulsar (YK98b, FHP00)
170 40 0055.8-7229 14.2 3.6 5.48e-03 $\pm$ 5.4e-04 0.006 [hard] [nonstar]
176 13 0035.3-7230 6.1 1.2 4.40e-01 $\pm$ 5.4e-03 0.075 SSS 1E0035.4-7230 (KP96)

185
42 0056.5-7233 80.6 19.0 2.32e-03 $\pm$ 4.7e-04 0.007  
194 42 0056.5-7233 26.7 6.5 1.00e-02 $\pm$ 7.2e-04 0.007 SNR 0056-72.5 (WW92) 13 cm
217 52 0103.2-7239 54.2 2.1 3.12e-01 $\pm$ 4.6e-03 0.056 SNR 0103-72.6 (WW92, CSM97) 13 cm
220 47 0100.1-7240 62.1 8.1 9.98e-03 $\pm$ 9.5e-04 0.007  
227 55 0105.4-7240 74.9 14.2 9.32e-04 $\pm$ 1.3e-03 0.002  

230
55 0105.4-7240 51.4 2.4 1.20e-02 $\pm$ 7.1e-04 0.002 [hard]
232 58 0107.1-7241 23.3 8.6 4.93e-03 $\pm$ 5.6e-04 0.004 [hard]
234 39 0055.6-7241 20.5 3.4 8.73e-03 $\pm$ 6.7e-04 0.003  
241 35 0053.2-7242 20.5 3.5 3.68e-02 $\pm$ 1.5e-03 0.009 HMXB Be/X XTEJ0055-724, pulsar (ML98, SCI98, SCB99, CO99)
242 34 0052.1-7242 33.9 25.7 8.50e-02 $\pm$ 4.7e-03 0.008 HMXB? XTEJ0053-724, pulsar (CML98)

252
59 0107.1-7244 67.8 13.7 5.62e-03 $\pm$ 1.1e-03 0.006  
265 27 0050.1-7248 26.4 45.8 5.45e-03 $\pm$ 1.5e-03 0.016 HMXB Be/X RXJ0051.8-7231, pulsar (WW92, ISA97, SCB99)
279 56 0105.6-7251 20.3 11.1 7.44e-04 $\pm$ 1.0e-03 0.007  
285 30 0050.9-7253 50.9 12.7 6.86e-03 $\pm$ 8.7e-04 0.012 SNR 0050-72.8 (WW92) 13 cm
295 19 0045.6-7256 54.1 49.8 4.06e-03 $\pm$ 5.1e-03 0.006 AGN? Radio SMC B0045-7255 (FHW98) 13 cm

320
48 0101.3-7300 53.7 17.2 3.58e-03 $\pm$ 7.9e-04 0.027 [fg Star] GSC 9141.7584
333 31 0051.1-7304 79.2 12.5 1.21e-03 $\pm$ 4.0e-04 0.008  
361 72 0102.3-7318 8.6 32.4 4.40e-02 $\pm$ 9.6e-03   SSS? RXJ0103.8-7254 (KP96)
379 62 0115.1-7315 21.5 14.0 6.04e-03 $\pm$ 8.2e-04 0.005 AGN z=0.253 (TDZ97)
385 66 0118.1-7316 19.5 13.2 3.13e-02 $\pm$ 1.6e-03 0.013 Cluster z=0.0656 (CGC97)

413
16 0045.5-7325 50.6 6.8 2.98e-02 $\pm$ 1.6e-03 0.020 SNR 0045-73.4 (WW92, RLG94) 13 cm
414 15 0044.7-7324 43.7 8.5 1.73e-02 $\pm$ 1.3e-03 0.007 SNR 0044-7325 (WW92, RLG94) 13 cm
419 16 0045.5-7325 88.2 4.7 3.72e-02 $\pm$ 1.5e-03 0.020 [SNR] 13 cm, part of source 413?
424 25 0050.0-7327 36.8 2.2 1.46e-02 $\pm$ 8.6e-04 0.011 [hard]
431 64 0116.1-7326 67.5 5.9 5.51e-03 $\pm$ 5.5e-04 0.005 [stellar] GSC 9142.1764

434
18 0045.6-7329 37.8 4.0 1.41e-02 $\pm$ 9.6e-04 0.006 [hard]
437 22 0047.3-7330 2.4 4.7 1.77e-02 $\pm$ 1.1e-03 0.007 SNR 0047-73.5 (WW92, FPH00) 13 cm
453 29 0050.3-7335 36.0 1.9 2.15e-02 $\pm$ 1.0e-03 0.009 HMXB Be/X RXJ0052.1-7319, pulsar (LPM99, ISC99)
454 21 0046.6-7335 34.0 10.8 5.15e-03 $\pm$ 7.2e-04 0.004 SNR 0046-73.5 (WW92) 13 cm
461 24 0049.2-7337 26.1 2.0 1.41e-01 $\pm$ 2.7e-03 0.060 SNR 0049-73.6 (WW92, CSM97) 13 cm

478
65 0117.2-7341 16.2 0.8 1.11e-01 $\pm$ 1.8e-03 0.016 fg Star G5V, HD 8191 (WW92, CSM97)
480 14 0043.7-7343 65.9 16.7 1.19e-03 $\pm$ 1.6e-03 0.004  
482 63 0115.8-7342 15.9 0.6 5.82 $\pm$ 1.2e-02 0.069 HMXB supergiant SMC X-1, pulsar (WW92)
496 28 0050.1-7346 43.5 10.4 9.39e-03 $\pm$ 2.4e-03 0.010 [nonstar]
623 33 0051.4-7455 2.5 0.7 4.12 $\pm$ 8.4e-03 0.413 fg Star G3:V+, RSCVn type, HD 5303 (WW92), 13 cm

             

Notes to the remark column to this and following tables:
Abbreviations for references given in parenthesis are described in the literature list.
Unsecure identifications from positional uncertainty begin with ? in the remark.
Candidates from literature are marked with ? after source class name.
Abbreviations: GSC: HST guide star catalogue (Lasker et al. 1990); fg: foreground.

3.1 Comparison with previous X-ray surveys

In Table 3 we summarize 50 PSPC sources which have an Einstein IPC counterpart (from Tables 2A and B in WW92) within 90 $^{\prime\prime}$. The IPC and PSPC count rates are compared in Fig. 4 where the sources identified with a SNR are marked with a circle. A linear fit to the SNR count rates gives a mean conversion factor of 2.8 for IPC to PSPC count rates, somewhat smaller than found in the LMC which is compatible with a slightly higher foreground absorption. The high mass X-ray binary (HMXB) pulsar SMCX-1 and the RSCVn type foreground star HD5303 were significantly brighter during the ROSAT observations (because the best source detection with smallest position error enters the catalogue, detections during bright source state are preferentially selected) while the pulsar RXJ0051.8-7231 probably associated with the IPC source 0050.1-7248 was bright during the Einstein observations. The unidentified ROSAT source 320 may be associated with 0101.3-7300 (a relatively large correlation distance leaves some doubt) in which case the classification as foreground star suggests a flare during the IPC observation.

A correlation of the PSPC catalogue from the pointed observations with the Bright Source Catalogue (BSC) of the ROSAT all-sky survey (Voges et al. 1996, 1999) yields 16 sources within a distance of 60 $^{\prime\prime}$ which are summarized in Table 4. Strong variability between survey and pointed observations was found for the two brightest sources of this sample (SMCX-1 and HD5303) and for the SSS RXJ0048.4-7332 which was more than a factor 20 fainter during the pointing with identifier 500251p than during survey. However, during other pointings RXJ0048.4-7332 was detected with count rates similar to the survey intensity (see Kahabka et al. 1994).

The first SMC catalogue based on ROSAT PSPC data and published by KPFH99 is less complete than the catalogue presented here mainly due to the limited number of observations and the more restricted field of view (45$^\prime $ vs. 52$^\prime $) used for the analysis. A correlation of the two catalogues shows that 209 sources have a counterpart within 60 $^{\prime\prime}$. For these the source number from KPFH99 is given in Table 2. The 39 sources of KPFH99 without counterpart in the new catalogue are summarized in Table 5. KPFH99 marked 15 of these with "D" as probable artifacts close to the WSS and we confirm that they are not real. Four other sources with relatively high likelihood are probably also false detections: source 223 in KPFH99 is the most extended one and not visible on the PSPC images; sources 75, 165 and 185 are near the WSS. Two sources (25, 186) are also near the WSS but may be real. Another 17 sources have likelihood values smaller than 15, close to our acceptance threshold and a slightly different background map used in the analysis is probably the reason why they are not detected in our analysis. Source 60 may be resolved into two X-ray sources (413 and 419 in the present catalogue) in an observation which was not used by KPFH99 but has source 60 closer to its field center. Source 413 coincides with a known SNR showing radio emission. Inspecting the ATCA $\lambda =
13$ cm image (see below) shows that the radio emission is associated with source 413 suggesting that 419 is a separate source.


   
Table 4: PSPC sources detected in the ROSAT all-sky survey

2 3   4   5 6 7         8  

No
BSC name d  r90 $r_{\rm BSC}$ PSPC Count Rate BSC Rate Remarks  
  1RXS [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [ $^{\prime\prime}$] [cts s-1] [cts s-1]    

8
1RXS J005052.4-710914 10.5 20.2 11 2.04e-01 $\pm$ 1.1e-02 1.20e-01 $\pm$ 2.3e-02 fg Star F5V, HD 5028 (WW92)  
47 1RXS J005837.9-713542 8.8 1.3 9 3.68e-01 $\pm$ 4.9e-03 2.81e-01 $\pm$ 3.2e-02 SSS 1E0056.8-7154, PN LIN333 (KP96)  
52 1RXS J003704.1-713821 34.1 17.5 19 3.86e-02 $\pm$ 2.8e-03 5.71e-02 $\pm$ 1.4e-02 AGN? [hard] [nonstar] Radio SMC B0034-7155 (FJW97) 13 cm jets  

107
1RXS J010403.5-720158 11.2 0.7 7 2.24 $\pm$ 2.1e-02 2.02 $\pm$ 7.7e-02 SNR 0102-72.3 (WW92, FPW99) 13 cm  
176 1RXS J003723.2-721415 14.0 1.2 8 4.40e-01 $\pm$ 5.4e-03 3.49e-01 $\pm$ 3.0e-02 SSS 1E0035.4-7230 (KP96)  
217 1RXS J010500.1-722305 17.5 2.1 11 3.12e-01 $\pm$ 4.6e-03 2.36e-01 $\pm$ 2.8e-02 SNR 0103-72.6 (WW92, CSM97) 13 cm  
461 1RXS J005108.0-732134 9.8 2.0 21 1.41e-01 $\pm$ 2.7e-03 8.08e-02 $\pm$ 1.6e-02 SNR 0049-73.6 (WW92, CSM97) 13 cm  
478 1RXS J011836.8-732529 6.2 0.8 14 1.11e-01 $\pm$ 1.8e-03 6.45e-02 $\pm$ 1.8e-02 fg Star G5V, HD 8191 (WW92, CSM97)  

482
1RXS J011705.9-732632 1.5 0.6 8 5.82 $\pm$ 1.2e-02 7.20e-01 $\pm$ 6.4e-02 HMXB supergiant SMC X-1, pulsar (WW92)  
512 1RXS J004820.7-733154 14.9 24.1 8 8.10e-03 $\pm$ 2.5e-03 1.99e-01 $\pm$ 2.2e-02 SSS RXJ0048.4-7332, symbiotic star M0 (KP96, M92)  
621 1RXS J004402.7-743737 6.1 5.9 10 8.96e-02 $\pm$ 1.6e-03 6.51e-02 $\pm$ 1.3e-02 [fg Star] GSC 9141.1004  
623 1RXS J005307.5-743903 2.4 0.7 6 4.12 $\pm$ 8.4e-03 2.38 $\pm$ 6.3e-02 fg Star G3:V+, RSCVn type, HD 5303 (WW92), 13 cm  

683
1RXS J012522.3-750015 2.1 10.2 12 6.26e-02 $\pm$ 5.2e-03 6.42e-02 $\pm$ 1.3e-02 fg Star SAO 255776 (SIM)  
709 1RXS J005655.1-751349 2.6 4.3 7 2.13e-01 $\pm$ 2.4e-03 3.00e-01 $\pm$ 2.4e-02 [AGN] GSC 9142.0531  
721 1RXS J012254.1-752117 10.2 1.4 9 8.15e-01 $\pm$ 1.2e-02 5.28e-01 $\pm$ 6.7e-02 fg Star WD, FAUST 199 (SIM)  
734 1RXS J013114.0-755643 15.0 17.7 7 2.28e-01 $\pm$ 9.7e-03 2.27e-01 $\pm$ 2.0e-02 fg Star K0, CD-76 56 (SIM)  

               


 

 
Table 5: PSPC sources from the catalogue of Kahabka et al. (1999) not detected in the present analysis

KPFH99 Comment1
No Name  

6
0035.0-7354 D
14 0036.0-7210 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 11
24 0038.0-7344 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 14
25 0038.0-7327 near WSS, may be real
38 0042.2-7338 D
60 0047.5-7308 two catalogue sources (413/419)
73 0050.7-7226 D
75 0050.8-7341 WSS, not real
81 0051.7-7341 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 10
90 0053.0-7239 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 10
91 0053.1-7311 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 11
97 0053.8-7252 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 11
99 0054.3-7330 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 11
112 0055.9-7257 D
113 0056.4-7159 D
119 0057.2-7156 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 13
132 0058.5-7249 D
136 0058.9-7255 D
142 0059.7-7148 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 12
156 0101.0-7151 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 11
157 0101.0-7211 D
161 0101.3-7118 D
165 0101.8-7249 WSS, not real
167 0101.8-7233 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 14
168 0102.1-7236 D
172 0102.8-7216 D
173 0102.9-7111 D
185 0104.2-7102 WSS, not real
186 0104.7-7203 near WSS, may be real
190 0105.3-7126 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 14
192 0105.4-7219 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 11
197 0106.3-7125 D
207 0108.5-7247 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 12
210 0109.0-7243 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 13
213 0109.5-7226 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 10
215 0110.6-7217 ML $_{\rm exi}$ = 12
223 0112.7-7207 not real, largest extent in KPFH99
241 0116.8-7314 D
243 0117.2-7238 D

   

1 Artifacts marked as D by KPFH99; likelihood of existence ML $_{\rm exi}$ from KPFH99.


3.2 Source identification and classification

Source identifications were mainly obtained by cross-correlation of the SMC catalogue with the SIMBAD data base operated at CDS. The derived samples of known X-ray sources show identical properties to those of the LMC and therefore we used similar classification criteria as for the LMC sources (Table 6; cf. Table 3 of HP99). As only exception, the selection for SSS was expanded to HR1+EHR1 < -0.70 which includes all sources with HR2+EHR2 < -0.70.

To select objects with high X-ray to optical flux ratio we enlarged the $f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$ classification used for the LMC. By using the optically brightest object in the error circle (to be conservative the 90% confidence error including the systematic error was multiplied by 1.5) a lower limit for the X-ray to optical flux ratio is derived. For this purpose optical Rand B magnitudes were taken from the USNO-A1.0 catalogue produced by the US Naval Observatory. Finally selecting objects with log($f_{\rm x}$/$f_{\rm B}$) greater than 0 excludes foreground stars and we classified these as $\left[{\rm nonstar.}\right]$Sources of this type in the observed regions outside the main regions of the SMC are candidates for background sources and if south of -74$^\circ $ 30$^\prime $ were in addition classified as [AGN]. However, we note that the H I emission of the SMC (Stanimirovic et al. 1999) extends that far south and finding X-ray binaries there is not completely ruled out.

  \begin{figure}
\psfig{figure=ww92_id.ps,angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip=,bblly=25pt,bbury=705pt,bbllx=70pt,bburx=580pt}\end{figure} Figure 4: Einstein IPC vs. ROSAT PSPC count rates. Sources identified with SNRs are marked with circles. The line is a linear fit to the SNR data points

Figures 5, 6 and 7 illustrate the selection criteria used for source extent, hardness ratios and X-ray to optical flux ratio. As in the LMC, the identified well known SNRs show the highest extent likelihoods and the two classified SNR candidates (mainly from hardness ratio selection) are found with significant X-ray extent. Also similar to the LMC the different source types separate in different regions of the HR diagram (Fig. 6) which can be divided into the same areas as in the LMC case. There is one object (source 380) with hardness ratios compatible to that of foreground stars which was classified as [nonstar] due to its high X-ray to optical flux ratio. A nearby radio source suggests the source as AGN candidate. The X-ray binary with HR1 near 0.5 marks the peculiar soft X-ray pulsar (source 53, H94). Foreground stars are well recognized from their hardness ratios and also from their low X-ray to optical flux ratio, i.e. typically log($f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$)< -1(Fig. 7). Most of the objects with high $f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$ have errors on HR1 larger than 0.25 and are not shown in (Fig. 7).

  \begin{figure}
\psfig{figure=ext_id.ps,angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip=,bblly=35pt,bbury=780pt,bbllx=40pt,bburx=570pt}\end{figure} Figure 5: Source extent and extent likelihood for the SMC PSPC sources with off-axis angle less than 18$^\prime $ (plus signs). SNRs are marked with squares (filled: secure, open: candidates, crossed: classified in this work) and known point sources (X-ray binaries, SSSs, stars and AGN) with hexagons


  \begin{figure}
\psfig{figure=hr_all.ps,angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip=,bblly=50pt,bbury=780pt,bbllx=50pt,bburx=570pt}\end{figure} Figure 6: Hardness ratios of identified and classified PSPC sources in the SMC area. X-ray binaries are marked with a hexagon, SSSs with crossed square, SNRs with square, stars with $\times $, and AGN with triangle. The thick lines separate areas where only members of a single class were found in the LMC (HP99). Only sources with error on HR1 and HR2 less than 0.25 are shown


  \begin{figure}
\psfig{figure=fxfo.ps,angle=-90,width=8.8cm,clip=,bblly=50pt,bbury=780pt,bbllx=50pt,bburx=570pt}\end{figure} Figure 7: Flux ratio $f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$ as function of hardness ratio 1 (HR1). The optically identified sources are marked with different symbols (X-ray binaries: hexagon, SSSs: crossed square, foreground stars: $\times $ and AGN: triangle). Unidentified sources with error on HR1 less than 0.25 and nearby GSC entry are shown with HR1 error bars. Some lower limits derived from the optically brightest objects in the error circle are indicated by arrows

Table 7 summarizes the properties of 158 identified and classified sources sorted by source class. The classification (including candidates) is complete for the 44 brightest sources down to a PSPC count rate of 0.02 cts s-1. This sample consists of 27% foreground stars, 16% background objects, 20% high mass X-ray binaries, 16% SNRs, 9% SSSs in the SMC and 9% sources which are probably either AGN or HMXBs. We expect at lower intensity levels less foreground stars but more background AGN.

The majority of classified sources (Table 7) consists of AGN and AGN candidates (46). Six AGN were optically identified by Tinney et al. (1997) and we suggest 22 new candidates which have an unresolved radio counterpart (mainly at $\lambda =
13$ cm). We classify as AGN additional 12 sources with high X-ray to optical flux ratio which are located south of the main body of the SMC. Table 7 contains further six uncertain AGN candidates due to large position uncertainties. The highly extended source 385 is identified with a cluster of galaxies. Another 24 sources are identified (12) and classified (12) as foreground stars.

X-ray sources intrinsic to the SMC are HMXBs, SSSs and SNRs. Fifteen HMXB and candidates, mainly X-ray pulsars discovered with instruments sensitive at energies of 1 - 10 keV are included. Only three pulsars compiled in Table 4 of KPFH99 (namely AXJ0051-722, XTEJ0054-720 and XTEJ0111.2-7317) were not detected in PSPC data. We note that source 79 in KPFH99 (source 188 in Table 7) is probably not associated with AXJ0051-722 because of the large (3$^\prime $) offset in position. Most of the X-ray binary systems were detected with PSPC count rates between 2.7 10-3 cts s-1 and 8.9 10-2 cts s-1 which converts to X-ray luminosities between 4.5 1034 erg s-1 and 1.5 1036 erg s-1 (using a typical conversion factor of 1.67 1037 erg s-1/cts s-1; Kahabka & Pietsch 1996, hereafter KP96). This "quiescent" level is similar to that seen from persistent galactic high mass X-ray binaries like e.g. XPersei, RXJ0146.9-6121 or RXJ1037.5-5647 (Haberl et al. 1998; Reig & Roche 1999). With the exception of SMCX-1 and the peculiar soft X-ray pulsar RXJ0059.2-7138 no other X-ray binary was found with a luminosity in excess of 1038 erg s-1 in the ROSAT band (0.1 - 2.4 keV). This casts doubt on earlier suggestions made before the launch of ROSAT (when only few X-ray binary systems were known in the MCs) that the fraction of high luminosity sources emitting near the Eddington limit in the MCs is higher than in the galactic population (Pakull 1989).

Four sources were earlier identified as SSSs, two were suggested by KP96 and three more are classified here as SSSs. Source 691 is likely identified with the SMC symbiotic star LIN 358 and is located together with source 664 remarkably far south of the SMC main body. Source 16 as third classified SSS is found north of the main body of the SMC.

SNRs form the largest group of the SMC sources in Table 7. However, it should be noted that the class of SNRs is more complete than the class of X-ray binaries because the latter can not be uniquely separated from the hard sources. Fourteen clearly extended X-ray sources are identified with known SNRs and three with new candidates from radio investigations. In the work here another two sources are classified as SNR, both significantly extended X-ray sources. SNR0102-72.3 (source 107) is by far the brightest in this sample of SNRs and amounts to about 75% of the total known SNR X-ray luminosity in the SMC of $\sim$5 1037 erg s-1 (using the same count rate conversion factor from above).

The classification of sources as [hard], [nonstar] and [stellar] does not allow a unique identification of the origin of the X-ray emission but restricts the number of possibilities. [Hard] and [nonstar] objects are likely candidates for X-ray binaries or background AGN while the [stellar] classification most likely selects foreground stars, but bright SMC stars can not be excluded as e.g. the Be X-ray binaries show typical optical magnitudes of 15 (cf. HP99).


  \begin{figure}
{
\psfig{figure=smc_image+fgbg.ps,width=180mm,clip=,bblly=350pt,bbury=730pt,bbllx=100pt,bburx=480pt} }
\end{figure} Figure 8: Distribution of foreground and background objects in the SMC region detected with the ROSAT PSPC. Foreground stars and candidates are marked with circle, AGN and AGN candidates with squares. The only source (385) identified with a cluster of galaxies is marked by a plus. Source numbers refer to Table 7


  \begin{figure}
{
\psfig{figure=smc_image+xrb.ps,width=180mm,clip=,bblly=350pt,bbury=730pt,bbllx=100pt,bburx=480pt} }
\end{figure} Figure 9: Distribution of SSS (plus) and X-ray binaries (circle) including new candidates from this work


  \begin{figure}
{
\psfig{figure=smc_image+snr.ps,width=180mm,clip=,bblly=350pt,bbury=730pt,bbllx=100pt,bburx=480pt} }
\end{figure} Figure 10: Distribution of SNRs and SNR candidates in the SMC


 

 
Table 6: Classification criteria

Source class
selection unidentified classified
      sources

SSS
HR1+EHR1 < -0.70 3 3
fg star HR1+EHR1 <0.25, HR2 - EHR2 > -0.70 7  
  HR1 <0.25, HR2 > -0.70, EHR1 <0.25, EHR2 <0.25 1  
  EHR1 <0.25, -0.75 <HR1 <0.25, log($f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$) < -0.5 2  
  EHR1 <0.25, 0.25 <HR1 <0.75, log($f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$) < -1.0 3 12
SNR ML $_{\rm ext}$ >50, offaxis angle <18$^\prime $ 1  
  HR1 - R1 >0.25, HR2 - EHR2 > -0.70, HR2+EHR2 < -0.10 1  
  HR1 >0.25, -0.70 <HR2 < -0.10, EHR1 <0.25, EHR2 <0.25 0 2
hard HR1 - EHR1>0.75, HR2 - EHR2 > -0.10 25  
  HR1 >0.75, HR2 > - 0.10, EHR1 <0.25, EHR2 <0.25 1 26
AGN EHR1 <0.25, HR1 >0.25, log($f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$) > -1.0 1  
  nonstar south of -74$^\circ $ 30$^\prime $ 12 13
stellar r90 <20 $^{\prime\prime}$, distance to GSC entry <r90 16 9
nonstar lower limit of log($f_{\rm x}$/ $f_{\rm opt}$)>0.0 31 31

     


3.3 Radio sources

Besides the radio catalogues covered by SIMBAD we correlated the PSPC catalogue with a preliminary list of radio sources resulting from the ATCA mosaic high resolution survey (Filipovic & Stavely-Smith, in preparation). The PSPC sources detected at $\lambda =
13$ cm ( $\nu = 2.37$ GHz) are indicated by "13 cm" in the comment column of Table 7. An inspection of the source morphologies on the 13 cm image revealed many point sources which are candidates for background AGN. In three cases jet like structures indicate radio lobes (sources 52, 157 and 390). Most known SNRs and SNR candidates are detected in the ATCA $\lambda =
13$ cm image and a new candidate (source 448) is found in the Eastern Wing of the SMC.

3.4 Spatial distribution of source populations

The spatial distribution of the different identified (including elsewhere published candidates) and classified PSPC sources from our SMC catalogue is shown in Figs. 8-10. Foreground stars and AGN are found in the whole field covered by PSPC observations (Fig. 8). Although, a lower density of detected AGN is expected along the main body of the SMC due to absorption of the X-ray emission, the small number of background objects in that area seen in Fig. 8 is mainly caused by incomplete classification of hard X-ray sources. The SMC intrinsic sources like HMXBs and SNRs are preferentially distributed along the main body of the SMC (Figs. 9 and 10). The high density might be caused by projection of a more extended distribution as Cepheid distances indicate a depth of the SMC of about 20 kpc (Mathewson et al. 1988). SSSs are detected around the main body (Fig. 9), very similar to the LMC where the SSSs are only found around the optical bar (HP99). SSSs may also exist inside the main SMC body but their supersoft X-ray emission is absorbed by the dense gas and dust.


next previous
Up: A ROSAT PSPC catalogue region

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)