The parameters of each star obtained in different wavelength intervals are close to each other, except for Arcturus, where we can find large differences in both effective temperature and gravity. One of the possible reasons may be that the infrared regions used in this work are not overly occupied by lines.
The effective temperatures obtained are in good agreement with that indicated by Gratton et al. (1982). Conversely, gravities are close to that derived by McWilliam (1990) and Lambert & Ries (1981).
The value obtained for [A/H] cannot be directly compared with that of
[Fe/H] obtained by other authors because our value of [A/H] represents an
averaged quantity, since the majority of lines are Fe-lines in the spectra of
K-giants,
the value of [A/H] has to be close to [Fe/H]. Moreover, small discrepancy
between [Fe/H] available in the quoted literature and the results presented
in this paper may be caused mainly
by the choice of values, and secondly by
the model atmosphere adopted here. Nowadays MARCS models are usually emploied.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Result of the optimization of ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 3:
A comparison of observed (solid line) and the best fitted synthetic
spectra (dashed line) for ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 4:
A comparison of observed (solid line) and the best fitted synthetic
spectra (dashed line) for ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 5:
A comparison of the observed (solid line) and the best fitted
synthetic spectra (dashed line) for ![]() |
Synthetic spectra presented in Figs. 2-5
are in good agreement with observed ones. Differences
between them can be caused by the following effects:
(1) abundances of each element may differ from [A/H], but
large abundance optimization of selected elements
(e.g. C, N, O, Mg, Fe), together with computation
of appropriate model atmosphere, still overloads
modern computers. However, for Arcturus we tried to compute abundances
of individual elements with fixed main parameters (i.e.
,
, [A/H],
), but the results
are inconsistent, probably because we used limited spectral regions.
(2) Line profiles may be affected by NLTE effects, although
Drake & Smith (1991) showed for
Gem, that
metallicities are not significantly affected by departures
from NLTE.
(3) Vertical stratification of some parameters, such us elements
or microturbulent velocity, may affect line profiles (see for example
Zboril 1996).
(4) Finally, there may be errors in atomic constants,
mainly oscillator strengths.
The present work mainly intended to show how spectrum fitting can be applied for the derivation of the atmosphere parameters of K giant stars. Another interesting comparison could be made while processing lines of each element separately, i.e. varying abundance of selected elements with constant atmosphere parameters (specially [A/H]), or, possibly, fitting lines of selected elements to obtain all atmosphere parameters. Moreover, discrepancies can be better discussed by the sorting of the lines by excitation potential, by ionization stages and by equivalent width. However, numerical tests showed that for such an analysis, spectra covering large wavelength intervals are required, but such study is beyond the scope of this paper.
Future research will be concentrated on the determination of atmosphere parameters of stars with lower metallicity (e.g. Pop II giants). This can help for a better understanding of the increasing discrepancy between the metallicities obtained for Arcturus. The results of these calculations will be part of a forthcoming paper (Krticka & Stefl 1999, in preparation).
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to
J. Kubát for kind help and to B. Plez for kindly providing model
atmospheres.
This research disposed of the SIMBAD database operated at CDS,
Strasbourg, France. Tables determining of ,
and [Fe/H] are taken from the catalogue of [Fe/H] determinations
(Cayrel de Strobel et al. 1997). We wish to thank our referee, F. Spite,
for valuable remarks on this manuscript.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)