![]() |
Figure 6:
The ![]() |
The cluster's horizontal branch in the diagram, in the
color-index range 0.20<(B-V)<0.75, actually runs almost exactly
horizontally. The stars closest to the instability region and to the
blue of it have, on average, V=15.46, slightly brighter than the
stars immediately to the red of the instability region which have, on
average, V=15.50. So we can accept
as the magnitude
of the horizontal branch at the level of the instability strip. This
value coincides exactly with that given by
Menzies (1974) and does not differ
significantly from the value 15.4 published by
Martins & Fraquelli (1987).
Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of stars along the
horizontal branch. This histogram shows that, at the HB level, the blue edge
of the instability strip is at and the red edge is at
. Menzies (1974)
gives systematically bluer positions for the boundaries of the instability
strip, namely (B-V)b=0.17 and (B-V)r=0.44, in agreement with the
comparison of the photometries presented in Sect. 3.
To derive magnitudes of the stars in NGC 6723 used in
Martins & Fraquelli (1987),
"the photographic plates were first digitized using microdensitometer
with a scanning aperture m square'' and then a PSF was derived
and applied using the necessary software. However, Martins & Fraquelli
do not directly present their (B-V)b and (B-V)r values.
From the distribution of stars along the horizontal branch of NGC 6723
published in their paper (Fig.7), it follows that
and
. However, these absolute
values should be considered with caution. Figure 3b in
Martins & Fraquelli (1987) shows that all their color indices are redder than in
Menzies (1974), the difference at the blue edge of the instability
strip being approximately
and at its red edge,
. Martins & Fraquelli emphasize that their
magnitudes of the photoelectric standards show good agreement
with Menzies whereas the photographic magnitudes deviate considerably.
We think that the discrepancy is the result of an insufficient account
of systematic deviations between aperture and PSF photometry.
Remarkably, within errors in our study and in studies of Menzies and of
Martins & Fraquelli, the measured widths of the instability strip are in
good agreement.
The conspicuous maximum at apparent in Fig.7
is noticeable as a clump of stars in the red horizontal branch
in the diagrams published by Menzies and by Martins & Fraquelli.
It has long been known (Mironov & Samus 1974) that the dereddened color index
of the most densely populated point on the horizontal branch,
(B-V)0,1, shows a good correlation with the difference of apparent
(not dereddened) color indices of the same maximum and the blue
edge of the instability strip, .This relation can be expressed as
![]() |
![]() |
||
The RGB color index at the level of the horizontal branch is
; thus, for the adopted reddening,
, and the standard color index (B-V)1.4
becomes (B-V)=1.51. The RGB magnitude at the standard color index
is V1.4=13.15, and the elevation of the giant branch above the
horizontal branch is
.
There exist a number of calibrations of metallicity [Fe/H] from and
. Recently
Ferraro et al. (1996) presented a compilation of the
relevant formulae. Table3 contains the values of metallicity for
NGC 6723, estimated using these formulae. Almost all these values are
considerably lower than the cluster's metallicity adopted earlier. The mean of
these determinations is
, rather close to the value
, recently found by
Fullton & Carney (1996) from high-dispersion
spectra of three red giants.
According to a recent detailed study
(Sandquist et al. 1996), the RR Lyraes
in the globular cluster M 5 are at the magnitude
, and the apparent distance modulus of M 5 is
. Similarly, according to
Buonanno et al. (1994) and
Ferraro et al. (1996), for M 3
, and
. This leads to the absolute magnitude for RR Lyrae
variables, MV(RR)=0.70 or MV(RR)=0.73, respectively.
Different metallicities of the clusters do not significantly influence
this absolute magnitude.
Following Harris (1996), we adopt the slope
. This means that, for a
metallicity difference
, the error in the distance
modulus would be only
. Adopting MV(RR)=0.72, we obtain
the apparent distance modulus
(m-M)V,6723=14.76 for NGC 6723. This value does not differ
significantly from that quoted by Harris (1996), namely
(m-M)V,6723=14.82.
The main-sequence turnoff is at
. The turnoff and
the horizontal branch are separated by
;the same value can be obtained from CMDs using different color indices
along the abscissa, the corresponding turnoff colors can be easily
retrieved from Table2.
Figure 8 shows the diagram for NGC 6723 and
illustrates clearly that the U band is especially helpful for separating the
stars of bright sequences that are practically overlapping in other diagrams.
Note that the asymptotic giant branch is now well separated from
the RGB and that the separation of red horizontal branch stars
from the RGB has become clear.
The UV-bright star above the horizontal branch (asterisk) is of special
interest;
it was not clearly isolated in the diagram.
Actually, the star is the standard H (see Table1); its
equatorial coordinates are
,
(2000.0).
Its cluster membership needs confirmation.
Of special interest is the relative position of blue (open circles) and red (open triangles) horizontal branch stars. They overlap in (U-B) color and show a distinctly different U-magnitude level near the instability strip.
A star plotted as a cross () sign in Figs.6, 8
and 9 appears a red horizontal branch star in
Figs.6 and 9 but as a blue horizontal branch star in
Fig.8. It might be an unknown RR Lyrae variable star, its behavior
resembles that shown by known variables (plus signs). Its position, in the
system of the catalog of variable stars in globular clusters
(Sawyer Hogg 1973), is
x=263'', y=17''.
In Fig. 9, we show the diagram for NGC 6723. From this
diagram, we can determine the parameters
and
,to be applied in the method suggested by
Sarajedini (1994) for simultaneous
determination of metallicity [Fe/H] and reddening E(V-I).
From our diagram, we find .Sarajedini's method gives
, corresponding to
, and
.This reddening agrees, within errors, with other determinations,
but the [Fe/H] value is significantly lower than all previous
determinations, including those reported in Sect. 5.1. Such a low
metallicity value must be incorrect owing to the method's
uncertainties. However, this result continues the trend of the recent
studies to lower metallicity of NGC 6723.
Indeed, the [Fe/H] value for the cluster must be lower than it was
previously believed: as noted in Sect. 4.2, the RGBs of M 3 and NGC 6723
exhibit very similar shapes in two-color diagrams as well as in the
diagram. We note that the metallicity for M 3 is -1.40 or
lower.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)