For reasons discussed by us in detail elsewhere (see, for instance,
Alcaino et al. 1998), we continue our
homogeneous approach to the determination
of age of globular clusters, awaiting the results of the current
polemic on the controversy of globular cluster ages and the Hubble
constant, in particular, with relation to the recent HIPPARCOS results.
This controversy has not been completely solved until now.
Chaboyer et al. (1998)
argue that, from several methods including HIPPARCOS results, a
consistent revision of RR Lyrae absolute magnitudes follows leading
to mean age of Gyr for oldest globular clusters. However,
Layden (1998) claims that no significant revision of the distance scale
for RR Lyraes follows from HIPPARCOS data, and
Frolov & Samus (1998) obtain the
distance scale for globular clusters, quite close to the traditional one,
from infrared absolute magnitudes of RR Lyrae variables; these results
tend to support "old'' globular clusters.
Fernley et al. (1998), on the base of
HIPPARCOS parallaxes and proper motions, derive statistical parallaxes
of RR Lyraes and obtain, for the mean age of Galactic globular clusters,
the value
Gyr.
In age determinations, we use the approach similar to that used by us for M 79 (Kravtsov et al. 1997), NGC 6397 (Alcaino et al. 1997), and M 30 (Alcaino et al. 1998): we do not fix any values of reddening and distance modulus beforehand, but, vary these parameters in order to determine which isochrone best fits the observations, especially in the region of the lower giant branch and the turnoff point. The optimal position of the isochrone is determined by the best reproduction of the shape of the subgiant branch and the slope of the main sequence as well as of the color and luminosity of the turnoff. We do not attribute much physical significance to the resulting reddening values and we are going to study the reasons for these values being different from those derived by more direct methods in our future research.
Figures 10a,b,c show the diagram with ridge sequences
of NGC 6723 (cf. Sect. 5.1 and Table 2), with superimposed
oxygen-enhanced isochrones
(Bergbusch & VandenBerg 1992) for three [Fe/H] values bracketing
the metallicity range discussed for NGC 6723. We used the following approach
to fit the ridge sequences. The HB absolute magnitude,
, is given
as a function of metallicity by the relation from
Harris (1996):
![]() |
(1) |
We estimated the age from the behavior of the ridge sequences in the region of the main-sequence turnoff and the subgiant branch, paying close attention to the quality of the fit of the observed sequences with the isochrones in this region for each adopted abundance.
In Fig. 10a, we present the isochrones for
. For the chosen
parameters, the agreement with the ridge sequences is excellent at
the main sequence, but the observed slope of the subgiant branch
is somewhat steeper than the theoretical one, and we are unable to find
a unique age value for the cluster. The position of the giant branch
disagrees with the cluster age that follows from the turnoff position.
The resulting color excess is somewhat
lower than that determined in Sect. 5.1,
and the distance modulus is lower than both our value (Sect. 5.1)
and the value cataloged by
Harris (1996). If, however, the metallicity of
NGC 6723 is really close to
, then its turnoff age,
in the Bergbusch & VandenBerg scale, is 16 - 17 Gyr.
![]() |
Figure 10:
The ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Figure 10b shows isochrones for
. Like in the previous
case, the representation
of the ridge main sequence for the adopted parameters
is excellent. However, the observed
slope of the subgiant branch now is close
to the theoretical one, and we
can also use this branch for age estimates.
Agreement with theory is also
found for the observed distance between the
turnoff and the base of the giant branch.
The observed giant branch runs along
the red edge of the theoretical RGBs.
For
and
, it
is even below this edge. Note however
that our red giant ridge sequence is not
quite reliable for V < 15 because of
the low number of measured red giants.
Still, as a whole, Fig. 10b demonstrates a much better agreement
between theory and observations than Fig. 10a and
Fig. 10c (described below). The color excess shows good agreement
with our determination (Sect. 5.1). The distance modulus also shows better
agreement, both with our determination and with the value from
Harris (1996),
than in the cases of Figs. 10a and 10c. If the
metallicity of NGC 6723 is close to
, then its age in the
Bergbusch & VandenBerg scale, from the turnoff and the subgiant branch, is
15 - 16 Gyr.
Figure 10c presents Bergbusch & VandenBerg isochrones for
, the metallicity
value closest to the modern estimates for NGC 6723.
For the adopted parameters, the agreement with the
ridge sequences for the main sequence is the worst of the three cases.
The observed slope of the subgiant branch agrees with the theoretical
one. The observed lower giant branch tends towards
the blue edge of the theoretical RGBs, i.e. towards lowest ages
in the Bergbusch & VandenBerg set of isochrones, and its position
does not agree with turnoff ages. The color excess is significantly
higher than our determination (Sect. 5.1), and the distance modulus
exceeds both our value and the value quoted by
Harris (1996). The
agreement between the theoretical and the observed diagrams is
achieved at
. If, however, the
metallicity of NGC 6723 is really close to
, its
age in the Bergbusch & VandenBerg scale, from the turnoff and the
subgiant branch, would be 13 - 14 Gyr, the minimum value among
the discussed cases.
We conclude that, from the point of view of the agreement between the
theoretical models and the observed sequences, the best metallicity
value is close to . It leads to the cluster's photometric
parameters (reddening and distance modulus) being in satisfactory
agreement with independent estimates and to the age of 15 - 16 Gyr
in the scale of Bergbusch & VandenBerg.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)