next previous
Up: Recombination line intensities for II


2 Adopted energy levels and "reference'' wavelengths

For H I and He II energy levels we adopt the values given by Erickson (1977). These are based on quantum electrodynamic calculations including the Lamb shift. This work makes a careful comparison between experimental and calculated energy-level differences, and demonstrates good agreement. In general the theoretical QED uncertainty is smaller than the experimental error.

For each transition of H I and He II considered, we adopted a reference wavelength, $\lambda_\mathrm {ref}$, for use as a zero-point in the presentation of the shifts of individual component lines in velocity space. These were computed from the Rydberg formula  
 \begin{displaymath}
\lambda_\mathrm{ref} = \left[ \mu R_{\infty} \left( n_\mathrm{l}^{-2} - 
n_\mathrm{u}^{-2} 
\right) \right]^{-1},\end{displaymath} (1)
where $R_{\infty}$=109737.3153 cm-1 is the Rydberg constant for infinite nuclear mass (Ferguson 1986), and $\mu$ is the reduced mass of the electron-nucleus system in electron masses. The finite mass Rydberg constants, $\mu R_{\infty}$, that were used to calculate the reference wavelengths are 109677.6155, 109707.4343, 109717.3590 and 109722.2772 cm-1 for 1H, 2D, 3He and 4He respectively.

The difference in energy, $\Delta_{nj}$, between the energy of a hydrogenic state En, given by the Rydberg formula and the energy Enj obtained from the Dirac equation is approximately  
 \begin{displaymath}
\Delta_{nj} = E_{nj} - E_n = - {{Z^4 \alpha^4 }\over{n^4}} \...
 ...ty}
\left( {{n}\over{j+{{1}\over{2}}}} - {{3}\over{4}} \right),\end{displaymath} (2)
where $\alpha$ is the fine-structure constant and terms in higher powers of $(Z\alpha)$ have been neglected. This equation describes the relativistic energy shifts of the hydrogenic levels (the mass correction and the Darwin term) as well as the fine-structure due to the spin-orbit interaction. The Lamb shift is not included but can be neglected for the argument made here. For a given n, ($j+{{1}\over{2}}$) runs from one to n, so that the bracket in Eq. (2) is always positive. Thus the levels $n\ell j$ always lie energetically lower than the corresponding non-relativistic energies given from the Rydberg formula. In addition, the energy shift $\Delta_{nj}$ falls rapidly as n increases. As a consequence, the fine-structure components in any transition $n_\mathrm{u} \rightarrow n_\mathrm{l}$ will generally be displaced to wavelengths shorter than $\lambda_0$ as given by Eq. (1), and the corresponding velocity shifts will usually be negative.

We ignore hyperfine structure in this work. Its effect is to double the energy levels of 1H and 3He, which have finite nuclear spin. The typical splitting is only $0.001\; \mathrm{cm}^{-1}$, which corresponds to a velocity splitting of $0.02\; \mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ for optical and UV lines, and is thus neglected.


  
Table 1: Summary of components, and reference wavelengths of hydrogenic transitions

\begin{tabular}
{rrrrrrrrrrr} \hline \rule{0mm}{2mm}
\vspace{0.1cm} & & & & 
\mu...
 ... 74578.4650 & 74558.1943 & 18637.8548 &
 18637.0193 \\  
\hline \\ \end{tabular}

Table 1 lists, for some commonly observed transitions of H and He, the number of components $N_\mathrm{c}$, the total range in velocity space of the components ${\Delta}v$, and the reference wavelength, defined as above, for the four isotopes 1H, 2D, 3He and 4He. We stress that the reference wavelength does not represent any mean wavelength for the line in question, but is simply a reference point to anchor our chosen scale of velocity shifts. Here, and throughout this paper, wavelengths are given in air for $\lambda\gt 2000$ Å and in vacuum otherwise. The variation of the velocity range of the components as a function of nuclear mass (e.g. between 1H and 2H, or 3He and 4He) is too small to be recorded in Table 1.


next previous
Up: Recombination line intensities for II

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)