next previous
Up: Determination of the

8. Final determinations of temperature and their relation to photometric indices

Now that it has been established that any differences between temperatures found using TCS, ESO, narrow band and narrow band published filters, are reasonably small, we combine together all of the various measured temperatures for each star to give the results listed in Table 1 (click here). In this section we relate these temperatures to stellar photometry parameters. We have so far neglected the small additional effect of metallicity in these representations of temperatures and a small correction term for this will be discussed later in Sect. 9.

8.1. Use of photometric parameters in the visible region

For this purpose we divide the stars of Table 1 (click here) into the three luminosity classes V, IV and III, and consider them separately, beginning with class V. Further, because we wish to compute polynomial coefficients of good accuracy for use in deriving temperatures from a database of photometric parameters, we choose for this purpose only the measures from Table 1 (click here) that we judge on independent evidence to be the most reliable. This segregation is based on the extent of the agreement among measures using different filters, agreement with previous measures using the IRFM, and the existence of a complete MK spectral type. These stars have temperatures accurate to between 0.5 per cent and 0.8 per cent in Table 1 (click here). Also, as our wish is to derive an accurate representation of stellar temperatures by a polynomial and a small correction factor for the effect of metallicity, we include at this stage only those stars with a measured metallicity that is less than 0.2 dex. In the following sections, we present separate regression analyses using data for the (B2-V1), (B-V) and (b-y) photometric parameters, all corrected for interstellar extinction, for the three luminosity classes V, IV and III separately, and for the two temperature regions, T < 6000 K and T > 6000 K, where this is possible, and including the restrictions described above.

8.2. Polynomial relations for stars of class V, IV and III

Table 6 (click here) presents the polynomial coefficients for relations between temperature and the photometric quantities tex2html_wrap_inline1631, tex2html_wrap_inline1629 and tex2html_wrap_inline1635, derived in the way described above for these classes of stars that have very small metallicities. Standard deviations in the percentage differences between measured and calculated temperatures are also given. These standard deviations may be taken as a guide to the reliability of temperature determinations for the selected stars, but it is likely that the deviations also include a small spread in the determinations of each photometric parameter, together with a real spread in stellar temperatures. Figure 3 (click here) shows a typical plot of temperature versus tex2html_wrap_inline1633 for class V stars, but the best parameter for all class V stars is apparently tex2html_wrap_inline1635. For class IV stars, regression constants and standard deviations for class IV stars are given only for temperatures greater than 5000 K. The restrictions described above have reduced the number of available stars so much that a division into two temperature ranges is not practical. However, a plot of temperature against tex2html_wrap_inline1631 shows that a discussion of the whole range of temperature for these stars is reasonable, and all available stars have been used for the calculation of regression coefficients presented in Table 6 (click here). The standard deviation of temperatures, of 0.91 per cent, is satisfactory. Regression constants for class III stars, using the above restrictions, are given for temperatures in the two ranges T < 6000 K and T >6000 K. The quantity tex2html_wrap_inline1633, where K is measured on the Johnson scale, is especially useful because it usually yields a standard deviation about the regression line that is smaller than those shown by other photometric parameters.

   

p A B C tex2html_wrap_inline1667
Class V (B2-V1) 7995 -7246 3284 1.52
tex2html_wrap_inline2123 (b-y) 9865 -13319 7483 1.30
(B-V) 8515 -5270 1440 1.72
Class V (B2-V1) 7749 -7911 7856 1.20
tex2html_wrap_inline2143 (b-y) 9034 -12562 11813 1.09
(B-V) 9134 -8600 5398 1.32
Class V (V-K) 8921 -2848 441 1.30
tex2html_wrap_inline2163
Class IV (B2-V1) 7949 -6944 3407 0.91
tex2html_wrap_inline2171 (b-y) 9030 -11396 8313 1.10
(B-V) 9078 -6545 2298 1.43
Class III (B2-V1) 5504 -190 -1198 1.01
tex2html_wrap_inline2123 (b-y) 4507 3213 -4454 1.00
(B-V) 4842 1413 -1426 0.91
Class III (B2-V1) 7581 -5927 3898 1.20
tex2html_wrap_inline2143 (b-y) 8613 -10332 8613 0.99
(B-V) 8667 -6383 3145 1.36
Class III (V-K) 8305 -2036 224 1.38
tex2html_wrap_inline2163
Table 6: Regression Coefficients A, B, C for relations between stellar temperature T and values of designated photometric parameters p: T=A+Bp+Cp2 for final temperature determinations; tex2html_wrap_inline1667 is the corresponding percentage standard deviation in temperature



next previous
Up: Determination of the

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)