next previous
Up: Structure detection in

1. Introduction

The ability of detecting structures in X-ray image of celestial objects is crucial, but the task is highly complicated due to the low photon flux, typically from 0.1 to a few photons per pixel. Point sources detection can be done by fitting the Point Spread Function, but this method does not allow extended sources detection. One way of detecting extended features in a image is to convolve it by a Gaussian. This increases the signal to noise ratio, but at the same time, the resolution is degraded. The VTP method (Scharf et al. 1997) allows detection of extended objects, but it is not adapted for the detection of substructures. Furthermore, in some cases, an extended object can be detected as a set of point sources (Scharf et al. 1997). The wavelet transform (WT) has been introduced (Slezak et al. 1990) and presents considerable advantages compared to traditional methods. The key point is that the wavelet transform is able to discriminate structures as a function of scale, and thus is well suited to detect small scale structures embedded within larger scale features. Hence, WT has been used for clusters and subclusters analysis (Slezak et al. 1994; Grebenev et al. 1995; Rosati et al. 1995; Biviano et al. 1996), and has also allowed the discovery of a long, linear filamentary feature extended over approximatily 1 Mpc from the Coma cluster toward NGC 4911 (Vikhlinin et al. 1996). In the first analyses of images by the wavelet transform, the Mexican hat was used. The method simply consists in applying the correlation product between the image I and the wavelet function:
eqnarray195
Where a is the scale parameter. By varying a, we obtain a set of images, each one corresponding to the wavelet coefficients of the data at a given scale. The wavelet function corresponding to the Mexican hat is
eqnarray201

More recently the à trous wavelet transform algorithm has been used because it allows an easy reconstruction (Slezak et al. 1994; Vikhlinin et al. 1996). By this algorithm, an image I(x,y) can be decomposed into a set (w1,..., wn, cn),
eqnarray215

Several statistical models have been used in order to say if a X-ray wavelet coefficient wj(x,y) is significant, i.e. not due to the noise. In Viklinin et al. (1996), the detection level at a given scale is obtained by an hypothesis that the local noise follows a Gaussian noise. In Slezak et al. (1994), the Anscombe transform was used in order to transform an image with a Poisson noise into an image with a Gaussian noise. Other approaches have also been proposed using k sigma clipping on the wavelet scales (Bijaoui & Giudicelli 1991), simulations (Slezak et al. 1990; Escalera & Mazure 1992, Grebenev et al. 1995), a background estimation (Damiani et al. 1996; Freeman et al. 1996), or the histogram of the wavelet function (Slezak et al. 1993; Bury 1995).

We discuss and compare in this paper the different methods for signal detection using the à trous wavelet transform algorithm and present how X-ray images can be restored even in the case of very low photon flux.


next previous
Up: Structure detection in

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)