next previous
Up: Recent developments in

4. The detectors spectroscopic performance

Single photon pulses were measured at different wavelength setting of the monochromator from the UV (200 nm) to the near infra-red (tex2html_wrap_inline1136m). Sample spectra are shown in Fig. 2 (click here). The mean charge output <Q> and the FWHM tex2html_wrap_inline1132 provide a determination of the detector responsivity tex2html_wrap_inline1142 and measured spectral resolution tex2html_wrap_inline1144 for a known photon wavelength. A typical responsivity of tex2html_wrap_inline1146 electrons/eV, equivalent to a mean number of tunnels for each charge carrier of tex2html_wrap_inline1148, was derived. The peak at the end of the charge range in the spectrum of Fig. 2 (click here)a is due to the pulsar used to determine the contribution to the measured resolution from the electronics tex2html_wrap_inline1150. At some wavelengths the second and third order from the monochromator are also apparent rather nicely illustrating the detectors intrinsic spectroscopic capability. The short and long wavelength limits of 200 nm and tex2html_wrap_inline1026 are due to the fibre optic cut-off.

  figure270
Figure 2: The charge spectra obtained from the junction when illuminated with a) 246 nm , b) 583 nm, c) 983 nm and d) 1983 nm photons from a monochromatic light source. The charge is in units of ADC channel (#) as recorded by the signal pulse height analyser tex2html_wrap_inline1154 electrons)

  figure278
Figure 3: The measured resolution tex2html_wrap_inline1156 tex2html_wrap_inline1158 and the electronics corrected resolution tex2html_wrap_inline1160 tex2html_wrap_inline1162 as a function of wavelength together with the best linear fits. The theoretical variation with photon wavelength of the Fano plus tunnel noise limited resolution tex2html_wrap_inline1164) based on Eq. (2) is also shown. The inset shows the current detectors signal to noise ratio (S/N) as a function of the near infrared photon wavelength in tex2html_wrap_inline1104m

Figure 3 (click here) illustrates the measured resolution tex2html_wrap_inline1170 of the device as a function of wavelength together with the resolution tex2html_wrap_inline1172 after correction for the electronic noise tex2html_wrap_inline1090), as determined from the constant charge input pulse, such that tex2html_wrap_inline1176. The limiting resolution of the device tex2html_wrap_inline1164) is also shown in Fig. 3 (click here), based on Eq. (2) with tex2html_wrap_inline1148 and a value of tex2html_wrap_inline1182, corresponding to that of bulk tantalum. The agreement between tex2html_wrap_inline1184 and tex2html_wrap_inline1172 is very good indeed, indicating that the detector resolution at these wavelengths is totally dominated by the tunnel noise with little contribution from spatial variations to the responsivity tex2html_wrap_inline1188) as observed at X-ray wavelengths (Verhoeve et al. 1996, 1997). In addition the signal to noise ratio is also shown in Fig. 3 (click here) (inset).This allows an estimate of the current long wavelength response beyond that actually measured of tex2html_wrap_inline1190m. Assuming a five sigma detection criterion above the noise the detector is currently limited by the electronic noise to wavelengths up to tex2html_wrap_inline1192m. Note this maximum wavelength tex2html_wrap_inline1194 can be simply written as tex2html_wrap_inline1196]. Further reduction in the noise of the room temperature electronics would of course extend even further this value into the infrared.

The linearity of the detector with photon energy is best measured using the multiple orders from the grating. This removes effects such as response changes with drifting temperature or possible calibration errors since the output from the monochromator over several grating orders are exact multiples of the same wavelength. Figure 4 (click here) shows the charge spectrum from the device when illuminated with optical light via the grating monochromator, with such a grating response covering four orders from 1183 - 296 nm. Not only are the various orders well resolved but the charge output as a function of wavelength can be precisely determined. The linearity is very high with a maximum deviation from linearity with photon energy of below 0.6%.

  figure319
Figure 4: The complete charge spectrum when the monochromator was set to select photons with a wavelength of 1183 nm. The grating orders 1 to 4 are all clearly resolved. Some distortion in the charge distribution at low and possibly higher charge levels can be discerned in each of these peaks and may be due to pile-up of events due to the signal process time of the electronics. Stray light and the incomplete conversion of the photons energy to charge carriers, due to possible substrate losses, have been ruled out as a major cause of such low intensity level tails in these spectra


next previous
Up: Recent developments in

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)