next previous
Up: Recent developments in

3. The tantalum STJ - experimental configuration

A number of workers have investigated devices which contain trapping layers, to enhance the multiple tunneling, for application at X-ray wavelengths (Gaidis et al. 1996; Mears et al. 1993; Poelaert et al. 1996). The results described here are for a tantalum based STJ whose geometry is illustrated in Fig. 1 (click here). The device consists of a tex2html_wrap_inline1020m square 100 nm thick epitaxial tantalum film on a smooth sapphire substrate on top of which a 30 nm thick aluminium trapping layer is deposited. The insulating barrier, of order 1 nm thick, is formed through a controlled oxidation of this aluminium. The oxide barrier is capped by a further 30 nm aluminium trapping layer followed by a thin seed layer prior to the deposition of 100 nm of polycrystalline tantalum. The leads are 2 tex2html_wrap_inline1104m wide and made of niobium to prevent quasiparticle losses down the leads from the lower bandgap materials of tantalum and aluminium. Further details on these devices can be found in Verhoeve et al. (1996a), while the role of the aluminium trapping layers is discussed in Poelaert et al. (1996). The original theoretical concept of quasiparticle trapping is described by Booth (1987).

  figure236
Figure 1: A schematic of the tantalum tunnel junction used in the current experiments together with it's orientation in a parallel magnetic field so as to suppress the Josephson current. The device is operated in a back illuminated mode therefore the UV response is limited by the cut-off of the substrate

Prior to establishing the optical performance of the device the key electrical characteristics were derived through the investigation of the I-V function at 0.3 K. The bandgap of the device at the barrier was determined to be tex2html_wrap_inline1108 meV. This is lower than that for bulk tantalum tex2html_wrap_inline1110 meV due to the proximity effect induced by the aluminium trapping layers. The resistivity of the barrier was estimated to be tex2html_wrap_inline1112 while the leakage current was tex2html_wrap_inline1114 at tex2html_wrap_inline1116 mV.

The optical experiments have been performed in a tex2html_wrap_inline1118 cryostat at a base temperature of tex2html_wrap_inline1120 K. As shown in Fig. 1 (click here), the device was illuminated through the sapphire substrate (back illuminated), via a fibre optic, by photons from a monochromatic xenon lamp light source. The illumination was initially at a very low intensity level tex2html_wrap_inline1122) such that only a single optical photon was incident on the detector during the tunnel and electronics processing time. All optical illumination described here was in this back-illuminated mode. This mode is preferred for two reasons: i) all optical photons are absorbed in the high quality epitaxial tantalum film, the charge from which is trapped by the aluminium film close to the barrier. Note the top polycrystalline film will have a coating of tantalum oxides tex2html_wrap_inline1124 nm thick (Peacock et al. 1997a) which may absorb a significant fraction of the optical photons if illumination was from the front. The resultant charge from photons absorbed in this oxide layer may well become trapped by such oxides. ii) The back illumination mode means that optical photons are not blocked by the lead to the top film. While this latter problem is minor for a single device, it would become a major issue when operating arrays where the number and layout of the top film connecting leads would cover a significant part of the top surface of the array.

The electrical signals from the STJ were read out using a charge sensitive amplifier operated at room temperature about 1 m from the device. Each detected optical photon gives rise to a pulse at the output of the preamplifier. The amplitude of this pulse is measured together with the pulse rise time and corresponds to the total number of tunnelled electrons (charge output) and signal decay time respectively. The electronic noise is continuously monitored through the response to an electronic pulse fed directly into the pre-amplifier. Typical noise values of tex2html_wrap_inline1126 electrons tex2html_wrap_inline1128 nm at tex2html_wrap_inline1130 nm) were obtained. Here tex2html_wrap_inline1132 represents the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the typically gaussian shaped charge distribution. Further details of the experimental configuration can be found in Peacock et al. (1996, 1997a) and Verhoeve et al. (1997).


next previous
Up: Recent developments in

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)