Most images were obtained at the Bernard Lyot 2 m telescope at Pic du Midi
Observatory (France) using ISARD imaging all-reflective camera (Lemaitre et
al. 1996, in preparation) using a thick Thomson
THX CCD with
pixels. ISARD gives a scale of 0.248 arcsec
per pixel but in the seeing conditions we met this leads to some
oversampling at the expense of exposure time. Therefore, the readout of the
CCD was systematically done using a
pixels on-chip binning
mode. Seeing conditions were between 2'' (at worst) in November 92 and
an exceptional 0.5'' during a night of February 1994, but the average was
around 1.2''. For objects observed during different runs, we selected
the frames taken under the best sky absorption/seeing conditions.
Several objects were observed at the 182 cm Cima Ekar telescope at Asiago
Observatory (Italy), using a TK 512 CCD (with ) during
several runs from August 92 to March 94. The average seeing conditions were
around 2''.
We used Johnson B and Gunn R filters. Coupled with the thick Thomson
CCD quantum efficiency spectral distribution, we found that the R
instrumental band was easy to reduce to the standard Cousins R band with
very small color term in the reduction equation. The color term was a little
bit larger for the reduction of the B instrumental band to the standard
Johnson B band. To derive the reduction equations, Landolt (1983,
1992) equatorial standard stars were observed, as well as, each
night, M 67 "dipper asterism'' field. (Schild 1983).
The M 67 field was observed at two or three zenith distances to derive the
extinction correction. The globular cluster NGC 7790 was also observed in
December 1992. High photometric quality nights in February 94 at Pic du Midi
allowed to search for the color extinction coefficient, which was found to be
not significant () and therefore not taken into
account in the galaxy images reduction. Flat-fielding was done with frames
taken on evening and morning twilight sky.
The data reduction was performed in 2 steps. First, the raw images were bias subtracted and flat-fielded. When a complete nightly set of flats was not available (because of observing conditions only favourable during part of the night) we used a procedure creating a mask of the images and we used as a flatfield the averaged and masked sky backgrounds. MIDAS package also provides a way of building a flatfield from the raw image. Both methods were used in order to avoid spurious effects like stars or faint objects in the field being taken into account during the process. The images from Asiago were treated along the same scheme.
In a second step the cosmic rays impacts were removed from the CCD frames. We largely used a standard MIDAS routine for this operation, checking very carefully that the information contained in the images were not altered, especially the centers of the stars and the maxima of brightness in the galaxies, which could be mistaken as cosmic rays impacts by the automated procedure in very sharp seeing conditions.
Careful aperture photometry was performed on the standard stars of the cluster
fields and on the Landolt stars. The following equations were used to reduce
the instrumental magnitudes and colors to the Johnson-Cousins system:
at Bernard Lyot telescope
at Cima Ekar telescope.
where b and r are the instrumental magnitudes defined by:
and
being the flux in ADU
corrected from the sky background, per minute of exposure time.
The reference magnitudes for the M 67 stars were taken from Schild (1985), Gilliland et al. (1992) and Chevalier & Ilovaisky (1991). Odewahn et al. (1992) provided the values for NGC 7790 stars.
The atmospheric absorption coefficients were determined on a nightly basis
whenever possible through standard methods. These coefficients were then used
to correct the magnitudes and surface brightnesses of the galaxies.
The R Gunn filter includes the line in emission in the rest
frame, and all objects having a low redshift, their
emission is
always present in the measured R flux.
This effect is probably not dominant in the presence of a substantial
background of evolved stellar population, but may contribute in some cases to
produce local red excess inside the galaxies, especially on star-forming
complexes that have a large equivalent width in emission. Note however that
in the galaxy SBS 1331+493, which contains a knot of high excitation and very
large equivalent width in emission lines, the knot appears extremely blue
in our photometry.
The surface photometry of the galaxies was performed with specially designed
MIDAS macro-procedures. Basically, we performed isophotal integration of the
flux. First, the sky background is evaluated in a number of pixel sub-arrays
surrounding the object. Further, the classical method of "equivalent profile''
devised by de Vaucouleurs (1959) and applied by numerous other
authors (see e.g. Ables 1971; Fraser 1977 for
detailed explanations) has been used. The flux from the galaxy is computed
inside isophotes of decreasing brightness , without setting any
constraint on the geometrical shape of the isophotes. This method allows to
take into account irregular shapes occurring in star-forming regions,
detached "islands'' of brightness, etc... and is well adapted to
non-axisymmetric objects. The brightness profile produced is called the
"equivalent'' profile. Each step of the isophotal integration produces the
following information:
The sky background was checked for each frame to be sufficiently flat
in the vicinity
of the galaxies to avoid sky-background fitting and subtraction
inducing complementary noise around the fainter isophotes. This was
done using different sky fitting algorithms and computing the rms on
the sky-background. The errors were estimated using the rms of the
sky-background mean level around the galaxies. Typically, the errors
were of less than a percent when no sky was subtracted and of about
after subtraction.
The quality of the isophotal integration critically depends on the local signal-to-noise ratio. The outermost parts of the galaxies are weak extended sources and their signal-to-noise ratio is generally insufficient on the direct images. To extend the photometry down to 1 percent of the sky background or even further, one must smooth the frames in some way. However, efficient smoothing numerical filters (such as the median filter) have generally poor local flux conservation properties, especially when strong brightness gradients are present in the image. Therefore, the isophotal integration was performed in two steps. For the inner parts of the galaxies, we used the direct full resolution frame, producing a first brightness profile. For the outer parts, we applied a gaussian filter of width slightly larger than the seeing disk before integrating and built a second brightness profile. The two brightness profiles were subsequently compared and merged together. This method proved satisfactory in all cases.
The data obtained at Asiago were also treated independently (by M.T.) using a method of ellipse fitting to derive the integrated magnitude and surface brightness profiles. This process fits ellipses to the isophotes without forcing the position of the ellipse centers. It gives results in excellent agreement with those produced by the equivalent de Vaucouleurs profile when applied to regular elliptical-like dwarfs. It fails on the central parts of the irregular-like dwarfs or the dwarf compacts showing several star formation regions surrounded by regular (elliptical or circular) shells.
The results of the isophotal integration are contained in two photometric tables (B and R) for each object. From these tables, the following quantities are derived:
The errors on the surface brightness profiles were estimated assuming that the Poisson statistics apply and taking into account the errors on the background subtraction (Saglia 1996).
For the errors on the integrated magnitude, the Poisson statistics do not entirely apply as one has to take into account the extrapolation process and the limitation due to the quality of the observations. The deeper the better, in order to reach the asymptotic magnitude without extrapolating.
Ideally, The B-R profiles are derived from the B-R maps obtained from the B and R images of the galaxies. Due to the limited S/N ratios obtained in the outer faint regions on our R band images, in order to analyze the color distribution of our BCDGs, we have adopted a method that uses the SB profiles of the galaxy in B and R band. The principle is to subtract the two SB distributions to built the new B-R distribution. We used the best sampled SB profile (B or R) to interpolate the apparent surface brightnesses as function of the equivalent radius. This allows to sample the surface brightnesses following the same distribution of radius and to subtract them point by point. This method does not exactly reproduce the general variation in colors along the SB profiles when the isophotal integration centers are not the same in both bands, because the interpolated points do not correspond physicaly. However, the differences are smaller than the errors estimated on the color profiles.
The B-R color distributions are shown in the atlas with the estimated
errors (we assumed the errors in B and R to be independent, so the
).
The results of the photometry are presented in an atlas (Fig. 1 (click here))
and a table.
For each galaxy, the isophotal map in B (with three exceptions for
which only R
images are available) is given and the equivalent surface brightness
distributions in B and R are plotted using a linear scale for the
radius, as well as the B-R profile at the top of the plot.
Table 2 (click here) collects the observable parameters derived from the surface
photometry:
Column 1: Markaryan number or SBS name.
Column 2: Asymptotic apparent magnitude in B and asymptotic B-R
color.
Column 3: Surface brightness inside the effective radius in
.
Column 4: Mean surface brightness inside the
effective radius.
Column 5: Equivalent effective radius in arcsec.
Column 6: Equivalent radius at 1/4 of the total
luminosity in arcsec.
Column 7: Isophotal equivalent radius at in arcsec.
Column 8: Concentration index in B and R colors.
Figure 1: Atlas of contour plots and photometric profiles.
For each galaxy, the contour plot of the B image is shown on the left panel,
with a surface brightness interval of 0.5 magnitude per square arc second.
The threshold surface brightness is
indicated in the lower left corner. For
Mk 1423, Mk 1426 and SBS 1533+574, the R maps are shown, no B image being
available. The solid
horizontal bar has a length of 1 kpc.
The right-hand panel displays the surface brightness distribution profiles
(abscissa: equivalent radius in arc seconds, ordinate: surface brightness in
magnitude per square arc second) in B (dots) and R (circles).
Object name[B filter] | mB(asympt) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | r0.25(B)[''] | r24(B)[''] | C21(B) | ||||||
'' [R filter] | B-R (asympt) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | r0.25(R)[''] | r24(R)[''] | C21(R) | ||||||
SBS 0136+328 | 16 | . | 91 | 19.20 | 22.50 | 4 | . | 98 | 2.38 | 5 | . | 68 | 2.09 |
'' | 1 | . | 03 | 16.68 | 20.40 | 3 | . | 08 | 1.78 | 9 | . | 04 | 1.73 |
SBS 0940+544C | 17 | . | 47 | 24.12 | 23.51 | 6 | . | 14 | 3.59 | 3 | . | 92 | 1.71 |
'' | 0 | . | 65 | 22.94 | 22.30 | 4 | . | 81 | 2.72 | 7 | . | 8 | 1.77 |
SBS 1006+578 | 16 | . | 55 | 22.38 | 21.81 | 4 | . | 28 | 2.22 | 7 | . | 75 | 1.92 |
'' | 0 | . | 88 | 22.26 | 21.47 | 5 | . | 59 | 3.31 | 10 | . | 22 | 1.69 |
SBS 1054+504 | 16 | . | 19 | 22.33 | 21.37 | 4 | . | 11 | 2.01 | 7 | . | 81 | 2.04 |
'' | 1 | . | 04 | 21.73 | 20.67 | 4 | . | 86 | 2.31 | 12 | . | 64 | 2.11 |
SBS 1147+520 | 17 | . | 29 | 22.27 | 21.81 | 2 | . | 88 | 1.58 | 4 | . | 85 | 1.82 |
'' | 1 | . | 45 | 20.90 | 20.37 | 3 | . | 01 | 1.86 | 8 | . | 17 | 1.62 |
SBS 1331+493 | 15 | . | 03 | 18.77 | 22.63 | 12 | . | 52 | 7.50 | 15 | . | 48 | 1.67 |
'' | 0 | . | 61 | 18.17 | 22.04 | 12 | . | 91 | 7.73 | 20 | . | 09 | 3.09 |
SBS 1413+495 | 16 | . | 40 | 20.23 | 23.78 | 15 | . | 78 | 6.35 | 8 | . | 84 | 2.44 |
'' | 0 | . | 82 | 18.01 | 22.77 | 9 | . | 98 | 3.22 | 10 | . | 13 | 3.09 |
SBS 1428+457 | 16 | . | 02 | 22.07 | 21.27 | 4 | . | 48 | 2.61 | 9 | . | 44 | 1.98 |
'' | 1 | . | 45 | 20.75 | 19.86 | 4 | . | 56 | 2.13 | 13 | . | 36 | 2.14 |
SBS 1533+574 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||
'' | 15 | . | 36 (mr) | 21.22 | 20.50 | 4 | . | 11 | 2.01 | 10 | . | 28 | 2.04 |
MRK 324 | 14 | . | 91 | 19.63 | 22.07 | 10 | . | 40 | 3.06 | 9 | . | 57 | 3.40 |
'' | 0 | . | 41 | 16.56 | 20.01 | 4 | . | 92 | 2.70 | 12 | . | 91 | 1.82 |
MRK 900 | 14 | . | 38 | 19.23 | 22.58 | 16 | . | 19 | 5.63 | 14 | . | 31 | 2.87 |
'' | 1 | . | 47 | 18.41 | 21.70 | 21 | . | 75 | 8.44 | 36 | . | 34 | 2.58 |
MRK 996 | - | - | - | 5 | . | 74 | 2.58 | 15 | . | 74 | 2.22 | ||
'' | - | - | - | 14 | . | 94 | 5.92 | 19 | . | 66 | 2.52 | ||
Mk 1131 | 15 | . | 03 | 19.76 | 23.58 | 19 | . | 77 | 9.12 | 10 | . | 61 | 2.16 |
'' | - | - | - | 7 | . | 34 | 3.62 | 22 | . | 63 | 2.03 | ||
MK 1308 | 14 | . | 87 | 22.68 | 21.45 | 8 | . | 17 | 2.55 | 15 | . | 06 | 3.21 |
'' | 1 | . | 14 | 21.06 | 20.10 | 7 | . | 44 | 3.12 | 22 | . | 51 | 2.38 |
MK 1416 | 16 | . | 99 | 22.93 | 22.07 | 4 | . | 14 | 2.19 | 6 | . | 75 | 1.89 |
'' | 1 | . | 29 | 18.87 | 20.94 | 4 | . | 49 | 2.00 | 9 | . | 81 | 2.24 |
MK 1418 | 14 | . | 37 | 21.56 | 20.85 | 7 | . | 79 | 4.90 | 16 | . | 95 | 1.59 |
'' | 1 | . | 46 | 20.50 | 19.81 | 9 | . | 10 | 5.44 | 28 | . | 09 | 1.67 |
MK 1423 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||
'' | 13 | . | 76 (mr) | 18.78 | 21.41 | 13 | . | 42 | 5.84 | 20 | . | 39 | 2.30 |
MK 1426 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||
'' | 14 | . | 76 (mr) | 21.32 | 20.22 | 4 | . | 89 | 2.30 | 14 | . | 45 | 2.12 |
MK 1434 | 17 | . | 36 | 22.01 | 20.86 | 2 | . | 00 | 1.06 | 4 | . | 79 | 1.88 |
'' | 1 | . | 17 | 20.91 | 19.80 | 2 | . | 10 | 1.07 | 6 | . | 90 | 1.97 |
MK 1450 | 16 | . | 99 | 21.68 | 20.71 | 2 | . | 22 | 1.22 | 5 | . | 33 | 1.82 |
'' | 2 | . | 16 | 19.76 | 18.78 | 2 | . | 46 | 1.37 | 11 | . | 17 | 1.79 |
MK 1480 | 16 | . | 56 | 21.95 | 21.11 | 3 | . | 25 | 1.64 | 6 | . | 69 | 1.97 |
'' | 1 | . | 03 | 21.60 | 20.65 | 4 | . | 21 | 2.13 | 10 | . | 37 | 1.98 |
MK 1481 | 16 | . | 78 | 23.53 | 22.83 | 6 | . | 47 | 3.70 | 8 | . | 05 | 1.75 |
'' | 0 | . | 79 | 22.99 | 22.24 | 7 | . | 13 | 3.95 | 10 | . | 14 | 1.81 |
MK 1499 | 16 | . | 53 | 22.43 | 21.49 | 3 | . | 90 | 1.97 | 6 | . | 82 | 1.98 |
'' | 1 | . | 10 | 21.41 | 21.16 | 5 | . | 55 | 2.47 | 12 | . | 40 | 2.24 |
The magnitudes were corrected from the galactic extinction, using the
E(B-V) maps of Burstein & Heiles (1982). The absorption coefficient
are computed from the E(B-V) values using the equation given by
Savage & Mathis (1979):
Figure 2 (click here) shows the comparison of the measured asymptotic B
magnitudes with the catalog photographic magnitudes given by
Mazzarella & Balzano (1986), and the
magnitudes given by Stepanian (private communication) for SBS objects.
The CCD magnitudes appear consistent with the eye estimated magnitudes
from the catalogs across the range spanned by the selected
objects. The dispersion in the diagram is also consistent with the
general accepted accuracy of of the Markaryan catalog
apparent magnitudes.
A large fraction of the galaxies show several knots of star formation activity, e.g. SBS1533+57 which shows at least 4 knots of star formation activity. In most cases, the knots have a different B-R color as their environment. They can be classified from red to blue, this probably reflecting different states of evolution, the brightness of the reddest knots being possibly dominated by red supergiants. Usually the bluest knots are off-centered and may contribute significantly to the luminosity in the blue range.
A substantial fraction of the sample shows outer isophotes that depart
conspicuously from axisymmetric shapes. As examples, SBS0940+544C and Mk 1416
which show a comet-like shape. Although it is tempting to associate these
departures from axisymmetry with recent gravitational interactions of
tidal type
with other systems, we have found only two objects with clearly identified
companions, namely Mk 1308 associated with a very close-by dwarf Magellanic
companion (2 kpc in projected distance), and Mk 1480 whose companion
Mk 1481 is
at about 11 kpc from its center in projected distance. A number of
objects also
show distortions in more inner regions, the most common behavior being the
"boxy'' nature of isophotes (that may extend to almost rectangular or
lozenge
shapes in extreme cases) and the rotation of the position angle of the
apparent major axis of the isophotes. It has been widely claimed in the
literature that boxy isophotes in spheroidal systems may be signatures of past
gravitational interactions and/or current merging phenomena seen just before
the complete relaxation of the system (Nieto & Bender 1989;
Hearnquist & Quinn 1989; Jedrzejewski et al.
1987; Barnes & Hearnquist 1992; Nieto et al.
1994).
Figure: Comparison between photographic apparent magnitudes from
Byurakan
surveys and asymptotic B magnitudes in this work. The sources of photographic
magnitudes are Mazzarella & Balzano (1988) (filled hexagon)
and Stepanian (private communication, open circle). The right arrows
represent Mk 1131 and Mk 996 for
which the photometric data are not reliable because of very poor weather
conditions during the observing run
Below are listed short descriptions of the objects.