next previous
Up: A photometric and

5. Luminosity function

 

The luminosity function is a good tool to compare the stellar content of different regions. It gives a first hint on the ratio between massive (bright) and less massive (faint) stars. However, different evolutionary states of the stars smear out some properties. But in contrast to the mass function no stellar evolutionary models or other theories are needed for the construction of the luminosity function. We assume that the luminosity function is a power law with
equation586
where tex2html_wrap_inline2933 is the slope of the luminosity function.

  figure588
Figure 12: Luminosity function (LF) for LH47/48. a) The LF for all 3522 main sequence stars. b) Comparison of the LF of inside the shell N44 (filled circles) and outside (open circles). The slopes of weighted linear regressions are given (inside: straight line, outside: dotted line)

The luminosity function has been constructed from main sequence stars. Only stars with tex2html_wrap_inline2939 mag and stars which do not belong to the "red clump" have been selected; in total these are 3522 objects. The star counts have been binned to interval widths of 1 mag. Figure 12 (click here)a shows the luminosity function found for all those stars. The error bars represent tex2html_wrap_inline2941 errors. In the range from tex2html_wrap_inline2943 to +2 mag the assumption of a power law seems to be correct. The first bin (tex2html_wrap_inline2947 mag) contains too few stars, probably some stars are already missing due to evolutionary effects. At tex2html_wrap_inline2949 mag (i.e. tex2html_wrap_inline2951 mag) incompleteness of the data sets in. The straight line represents a weighted linear regression for the range tex2html_wrap_inline2953 to +2 mag (i.e. V = 13 to 21 mag). The slope of the line is tex2html_wrap_inline2959.

Figure 12 (click here)b shows a comparison of the luminosity function between the interior and the exterior of the superbubble N44. For the inner part all main sequence stars with a distance of less than tex2html_wrap_inline2963 from the centre of the shell have been taken into account (1204 stars), for the outer part only stars more distant than tex2html_wrap_inline2965 (1601 stars) from the centre have been selected. Error bars have been omitted in Fig. 12 (click here)b for clarity. There is a clear difference of the luminosity function between the two samples. In the inner part the luminosity function flattens significantly towards brighter stars. An error-weighted linear regression gives tex2html_wrap_inline2967 for the interior of the shell and tex2html_wrap_inline2969 for the exterior. The fits have been calculated for the same magnitude range as in Fig. 12 (click here)a, i.e. from tex2html_wrap_inline2971 to +2 mag. The solid line represents the fit for the inner region, the dotted line the fit for the outer region.

The slope of the luminosity function for the entire region (tex2html_wrap_inline2975) is in good agreement with the value of tex2html_wrap_inline2977 found for the luminosity function of NGC1962-65-66-70 (LH58; Will et al. 1995b). Malumuth & Heap (1994) found tex2html_wrap_inline2983 for the inner region of 30 Dor and tex2html_wrap_inline2985 for the outer partsgif. For NGC595 in M33 Malumuth et al. (1996) give tex2html_wrap_inline2997. For more slopes of luminosity functions in recent papers see Will et al. (1995b).


next previous
Up: A photometric and

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr