Type I | Type IIa | Type IIb | Type III | |
population | young disk | disk | old disk | thick disk (?) |
initial masses | 2.5 - 8.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.2 - 1.8 | 0.95 - 1.2 |
![]() |
0.15 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.66 |
mean age (Gyr) | 0.3 | 1.4 | 4.3 | 10.2 |
![]() |
Figure 1: N/O vs. O/H plot for galactic planetaries where only type I and non-type I objects are discriminated. Data are from Costa & de Freitas Pacheco (1996) |
To analyse the data, we have first segregated
the planetaries of our galactic sample in two main groups, type I and non-type
I. Figure 1 shows these objects in the plane N/O vs. O/H. We note that type I
objects (filled circles)
show a net anti-correlation, but the remaining PN (open
circles) display a scatter
diagram. In Fig. 2 we have performed the same plot, but now taking into
account the class membership.
In order to avoid confusion and to strengthen our point, we plotted only
type I (filled circles)
and type IIb objects. In this plot we see that objects of the same class
have a tendency to display a negative correlation, with planetaries having
older progenitors being displaced towards lower oxygen abundances for a given
N/O ratio. Type III PN follow a strip on the left of type IIb, whereas
type IIa objects lie on an intermediate position between types I and IIa.
A possible interpretation of these plots is that each class is
characterized by progenitors within a given mass range (or within
a given age interval) and the oxygen variation in each group reflects
abundance gradients present in the galactic disk (Maciel & Köppen 1994).
Under these conditions, the observed N/O - O/H anti-correlation indicates
that the surface enrichment of the progenitor, as a consequence of a
dredge-up episode, depends on the metallicity.
![]() |
Figure 3: Same plot for LMC planetaries. Two groups are identified. Filled circles are probably young planetaries, while open circles correspond to objects 5 Gyr old |
Guided by these results and using both data by de Freitas Pacheco et al.
(1993a,b) and those compiled by Richer (1993), we were able to identify two
main PN groups in the LMC. Figure 3 shows the N/O - O/H plot for LMC planetaries,
where the different symbols distinguish
objects belonging to these different groups. The anti-correlation is clearly
detected, in agreement
with the conclusions by Henry et al. (1989). The older population
has a mean
oxygen abundance of
= 7.87 and, using the evolutionary
chemical model
for the LMC by de Freitas Pacheco (1998), we found that the mean age of these
planetaries
is about 5 Gyr. This means that their progenitors have been formed just before
the past enhanced
star formation episode 3-4 Gyr ago. The second group is younger and should be a
consequence of the star formation event extending over most of the past 3-4 Gyr,
detected
on color-magnitude diagrams (Westerlund et al. 1995; Vallenari et al.
1996; Gallagher et al. 1996; Ardeberg et al. 1997).
In Fig. 4 we plotted SMC data. Filled circles correspond to present
data, while open circles
correspond to literature data compiled by Richer (1993), excluding common
objects. Again,
the N/O - O/H anti-correlation is seen but we were not able to discriminate
different age
groups, in spite of the hint suggested by the observed dispersion of data.
The bulk of the objects have abundances in the range 8.0
8.5
indicating ages less than 3 Gyr, according to our chemical models for the SMC,
to be reported elsewhere. This is consistent with the fact that
SMC planetaries have global mean abundances compatible with HII region values,
as we have mentioned before. The only exception is SMP25. The rather high electron
temperature, in agreement with the value found by Leisy & Dennefeld (1996), is
a signature of a metal-poor nebula, consistent with our abundance determination.
Our
chemical evolutionary models suggest an age of about 12 Gyr for this object.
In the galactic case, the oxygen spread within a given class may be explained by an age spread as well as by abundance gradients existent in the disk. Probably this is also true for the LMC, since HII region data are consistent with a small gradient (Kolbulnick 1998). It is worth mentioning that such a gradient is not seen in F-supergiant stars (Hill et al. 1995). In the SMC case, no gradients were detected (Kolbulnick 1998) and abundance variations must be related to an age effect and/or to incomplete mixing.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)