Galaxy |
Ap. |
![]() |
H |
arcsec | mag | ||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
Z 97005 |
3.80 | -1.15 | 15.31 |
Z 97005 | 5.80 | -.97 | 14.58 |
Z 97005 | 7.70 | -.85 | 14.09 |
Z 97005 | 9.60 | -.75 | 13.78 |
Z 97005 | 11.50 | -.67 | 13.52 |
Z 97005 | 15.40 | -.54 | 13.15 |
Z 97005 | 16.70 | -.51 | 13.05 |
Z 97005 | 19.20 | -.45 | 12.92 |
Z 97005 | 22.50 | -.38 | 12.80 |
Z 97005 | 26.90 | -.30 | 12.67 |
Z 97005 | 30.70 | -.25 | 12.61 |
Z 97005 | 34.60 | -.19 | 12.56 |
Z 97005 | 38.40 | -.15 | 12.53 |
Z 97011 | 3.80 | -.80 | 14.67 |
Z 97011 | 5.80 | -.62 | 14.04 |
Z 97011 | 7.70 | -.49 | 13.67 |
Z 97011 | 9.60 | -.40 | 13.43 |
Z 97011 | 11.50 | -.32 | 13.26 |
Z 97011 | 15.40 | -.19 | 13.09 |
Z 97011 | 16.70 | -.16 | 13.05 |
Z 97011 | 19.20 | -.10 | 13.01 |
Z 97011 | 22.50 | -.03 | 12.97 |
Z 97011 | 26.90 | .05 | 12.97 |
Z 97013 | 3.80 | -1.10 | 16.29 |
Z 97013 | 5.80 | -.92 | 15.61 |
Z 97013 | 7.70 | -.79 | 15.21 |
Z 97013 | 9.60 | -.70 | 14.96 |
Z 97013 | 11.50 | -.62 | 14.76 |
Z 97013 | 15.40 | -.49 | 14.58 |
Z 97013 | 16.70 | -.46 | 14.53 |
Z 97013 | 19.20 | -.40 | 14.53 |
Z 97013 | 22.50 | -.33 | 14.51 |
Z 97021 | 3.80 | -.98 | 12.59 |
Z 97021 | 5.80 | -.79 | 12.12 |
Z 97021 | 7.70 | -.67 | 11.87 |
Z 97021 | 9.60 | -.57 | 11.71 |
Z 97021 | 11.50 | -.50 | 11.58 |
Z 97021 | 15.40 | -.37 | 11.41 |
Z 97021 | 16.70 | -.33 | 11.36 |
Z 97021 | 19.20 | -.27 | 11.29 |
Z 97021 | 22.50 | -.20 | 11.21 |
Z 97021 | 27.10 | -.12 | 11.13 |
Z 97021 | 31.50 | -.06 | 11.07 |
Z 97021 | 34.90 | -.01 | 11.02 |
Z 97021 | 38.40 | .03 | 10.98 |
The photometry of 159 galaxies observed under photometric conditions has been checked against 187 published aperture photometry measurements (see Gezari et al. 1993). The comparison of our "virtual aperture'' measurements with the reference photometry, taken through apertures consistent with ours, is given in Fig. 3. On the average we find:
= -0.026
0.095 mag.
The most discrepant measurements are those taken through small apertures (5-15 arcsec),
due to a combination of seeing effects and unaccurate galaxy centering.
We estimate the overall photometric accuracy of our data,
including systematic errors in the calibration, to be 0.1 mag.
![]() |
Figure 3: The comparison between the present photometric measurements and those available from the literature as a function of the normalized aperture |
Our NIR observations available so far (including those given in Papers I, II and IV and in B97) were also analyzed using a more sophisticated approach than the one adopted here: 1) the surface brightness profiles were derived from azimuthally averaged elliptical isophotes with center, ellipticity and position angle taken as free parameters. 2) the surface brightness profiles were decomposed into combinations of exponential and de Vaucouleurs laws (or double exponential profiles) using a fitting algorithm. We prefer to postpone the discussion of these profile decompositions to a forthcoming paper (Paper V of this series; some details of the decomposition procedures can be found in Scodeggio et al. 1998). However we wish to anticipate here a few results which depend on the fitting algorithms only as a tool necessary to extrapolate the measured photometry to infinity: i.e. to obtain total magnitudes, concentration indexes and also to derive isophotal radii at a given limiting surface brightness (20.5 mag arcsec-2in this cse) when the observations do not reach such a limit.
Table 1 gives the H band measured parameters of the observed galaxies, as follows:
Column 18:
magnitude obtained extrapolating the present photometric
measurements to the optical diameter along circular apertures as in Gavazzi &
Boselli (1996).
Column 19:
magnitude computed at the optical diameter (see Col. 18) corrected
for galactic and internal extinction following Gavazzi & Boselli (1996).
The adopted internal
extinction correction is
where D = 0.17, as determined
in Boselli & Gavazzi (1994).
Column 20:
total H magnitude extrapolated to infinity along either an
exponential or a de Vaucouleurs r1/4 law fitted to the outer parts of the
observed radial surface brightness profiles (see Paper V for details).
Column 21: galaxy observed major (rH(20.5)) radius (in arcsec) determined
in the elliptical azimuthally-integrated
profiles as the radius at which the surface
brightness reaches 20.5 H-mag arcsec-2.
Galaxies which require a surface brightness extrapolation larger than
0.5 mag to reach the
magnitude isophote are labelled -1.
Column 22: the model-independent concentration index C31,
as defined in de Vaucouleurs (1977), is the ratio between the radii that
enclose 75% and 25% of the total light .
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)