The observations were made at the Southern European Southern
Observatory (La Silla, Chile) by Doublier
and Caulet using the 1.54 m Danish Telescope, during two periods:
April 29 - May 3 and December 20-23, 1995. In April-May, the direct
camera was equipped with a thinned back-illuminated 10241024
pixel Tektronix CCD (ESO #28) with a pixel scale of 0.36''. In
December, DFOSC (Danish Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera) was
equipped with the thinned Loral 2048
2048 CCD#17 with a pixel
scale of 0.38''.
Each galaxy field was exposed three times with a dithering step equal to at least the size of the galaxy in order to correct for blemishes on the CCD chip. Short exposures were taken to avoid saturation of bright stars in the fields that could create ghosts and uneven background, CCD saturation and bleeding. The data were bias subtracted, flat fielded and combined in the standard way, using the IRAF package.
During both runs, the weather was clear, and the seeing was between 0.9 and 1.1'' (FWHM measured on field stars close to the objects). Weather conditions did not vary much during the nights, the variations of airmass-dependent terms in Eqs. (1) and (2) were less than 0.005. In addition, we observed the galaxies close to meridian, to reduce the variation of atmospheric absorption. Therefore, seeing and/or absorption were not important effects when we combined the frames, even those taken during different nights.
We used Johnson B and R ESO filters in combination with the CCDs,
producing instrumental systems that are easy to convert to the
standard Cousins system. The color terms were found to be
negligible for both
filters. For the photometric calibration, some [Landolt(1992)]
equatorial standard stars were followed throughout the nights at
different airmasses. Table 2 summarizes the observation log, as well
as the signal-to-noise ratio obtained at the surface brightness of 25
mag/arcsec2 in both bands.
Aperture photometry was performed on standard Landolt stars. We obtained the following equations which are used to convert our instrumental magnitudes (b, r) and colors to the Johnson-Cousins system, the values in parenthesis correspond to those obtained during the December run:
![]() |
(1) | |
(2) | ||
(3) | ||
(4) |
The atmospheric absorption coefficients and zero points magnitudes were determined each night in a standard way. The values given in the above equations are average values for each observing period.
The Johnson R filter includes the H emission line in the
rest frame; all objects have low redshift, and their H
emission is always included in the measured R flux. Over the galaxy, the
H
flux is
less important than a substantial background
from an evolved stellar population, but it may, in some cases,
produce a local red excess inside the galaxies, especially in star
forming complexes that may have a large equivalent width of H
emission.
The surface photometry of the galaxies was done with our own MIDAS
(see Paper I)
macro-procedures, and the reader is referred to Paper I for a complete
description of the methods used. We briefly summarize the method: an
isophotal integration of the flux was done without setting any
constrain on the geometry of the isophotes (equivalent profile
method, [De Vaucouleurs1959]; [Fraser1977]).
After a careful estimation of the local sky background, the following
photometric parameters were derived (using the notation from
[De Vaucouleurs1959]): the equivalent radius and
r0.25, within which are contained
half and a quarter of the total luminosity respectively; they were derived
from the curve of growth of the instrumental magnitudes, before
Galactic foreground extinction
correction. The asymptotic magnitude was extrapolated from the last 4
points on the integrated magnitude curve of growth. The surface
brightnesses at
and r0.25, and the average surface
brightness inside the effective radius,
, were also
measured. We have checked that the variation of the derived parameters
with different values of extinction is not large, considering the
errors on the measurement of the radius,
and the estimation of the asymptotic magnitude. For instance, adding an
arbitrary value of AB = 0.3 mag to the galaxy leads to decrease
the effective radius by 0.2 arcsec. This is not significant
considering the average seeing of 1.1'' we had throughout our
runs.
The sky background was checked to be flat in the vicinity of the objects. Since our procedures to derive the surface photometry take into account the local sky background, we wanted to avoid sky background subtraction on the image. In the cases of sky gradients under the objects, we subtracted a two-dimensional fit of the sky from the images.
As in Paper I, to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the faint outermost isophotes, we have performed the isophotal integration in two steps. First, we used the direct image to produce a surface brightness profile, valid at bright intensity levels, then we smoothed the images with a Gaussian filter of a few pixels of width that matched the seeing disk of the images, and we built a second profile. Finally, the two surface brightness profiles were merged.
The errors in magnitudes and surface brightness were estimated assuming
Poisson statistics, and taking into account the errors on the
sky background estimation (based on local 1- variation). We
used the relation given by [Saglia et al.(1997)].
The errors on the asymptotic magnitudes are more difficult to estimate accurately because pure Poisson statistics do not apply, and due to the extrapolation of a magnitude based on the last four points of the photometric profile. We estimate that the errors are of the order of those made on the photometric calibration, e.g. 1%.
The data in Table 3 have not been corrected for Galactic foreground extinction. Extinction has been applied when deriving the integrated parameters such as the absolute magnitudes in B and R (MB and MR resp.). We used the E(B-V) maps of [Burstein & Heiles1982] and derived the absorption coefficients using Savage & Mathis (1979) relations: AB = 4.0 E(B-V) and AR = 2.52 E(B-V).
The method used to trace the B-R color profiles is the same as in Paper I. We interpolated the surface brightness (SB) profiles in B and R because the sampling of the profiles are different in each band, and subtracted the resulting profiles from one another. The results are in excellent agreement with those obtained directly by performing the photometry on B-R two-dimensional maps of several galaxies (Mk 996, Haro 14 and Fairall 301), only of better signal-to-noise toward the faint regions. Since we did not correct neither the profiles, nor the images from the seeing effects, the profiles are not to be seriously considered within the central first 1'' radius.
The errors are calculated assuming that the errors in B and R are independent, using:
![]() |
(5) |
Most of our objects show several star forming regions or knots with
B-R colors different from those of their host galaxies. We note that
the knots get bluer away from the photometric center of the galaxy. This
behaviour could reflect a variation of internal
reddening due to dust, or more likely an age spread. However, those
objects do not
show obvious presence of dust as the ratio between the recombination
lines of hydrogen H/H
remains close to a value of 3.
Some galaxies have a single
compact star forming knot (
5-10''), whereas , in other
galaxies, "multi-knots''
regions are distributed over more than 2/3 of the galaxy's surface.
As in Paper I, the morphology of several BCDGs in the present sample departs conspicuously from axisymmetric shapes, for instance Tol 1937-423, UM 461, in the present sample. Because irregular morphology in star forming galaxies can be explained by mergers and dynamical interaction, and because our galaxies are not associated with known companions (except UM 465), we have searched for faint galaxy companions close to our BCDGs on our deep optical images. The results are presented in Sect. 4.3. We discuss now in detail the properties of individual galaxies. Other distortions (boxy isophotes, isophote apparent major axis rotation) are noted in the inner regions of several galaxies.
A summary of the anomalies noted in the BCDGs studied in our sample is given in Table 4 at the end of this section.
The integrated color of the galaxy is not very blue: B-R = 1.1, suggesting the presence of an evolved underlying stellar population, also indicated by the off-centered circular envelope.
![]() |
Figure 2:
a)
B surface brightness distributions of the Elliptical-like BCDGs.
The figure shows the B surface brightness distribution of the 13 objects
whose SB distribution is clearly dominated by a r1/4 law, as a function
of the reduced variable: (![]() |
This galaxy has a blue core (B-R 0.5) embedded in a diffuse
bright area elongated along the major axis. Another small star forming
region (B-R
0.4) is conspicuous at 13'' South-east of the
center. The outer/low surface brightness envelope has a boxy shape
with a redder color
B-R
1.5 with a strong center-to-edge color gradient. Two small
angular diameter objects are located to the South-East of the
isophotes of
Mk 600. The closest has a diameter of 13'', and is elongated along
the major
axis of the main galaxy with a North-West extension. The second object
is also resolved (FWHM of 2.5''), located further away along the
major axis. Without spectroscopic redshift, the nature of these
objects is uncertain. Nevertheless, their magnitudes 18.90 and 20.50
(B and R respectively),
and their colors
0.6 and 1.1, suggest the possibility that
they are faint galaxy companions near Mk 600. At the North-West
boundary of Mk 600, a low surface brightness blue extension is also
detected. The surface brightness distribution of Mk 600 is consistent
with a dominant r1/4 law, but some deviations are obvious.
This BCDG is embedded in a faint envelope; it has regular isophotes, a
bright blue core (B-R 0.5), with two separated knots slightly
off-centered. The brightness gradient towards the outer regions is
more pronounced on one side (North-East) than the other. The major
axis of the central star-forming region does not coincide with that of
the whole galaxy. The SB distribution beyond a radius of 10'' is
dominated by an exponential law.
The recession velocity of this galaxy is 2055 km s-1; it was kindly
supplied to us by G. Dudziak (private communication), inferring MB
= -16.26. The morphological structure of this galaxy is reminiscent
of the Magellanic type galaxy NGC 4449, or II ZW 33
([Loose & Thuan1986b]). A very blue (B-R 0.4), extended,
bar-shaped star
forming region out of which protrude two opposite clumpy extensions,
is embedded in a boxy envelope. The surface brightness profile is
composite: the inner regions can be fitted by an exponential law with
a steep central braightness gradient; and a very shallow outer envelope
can be fitted by another exponential law with a faint central brightness.
The overall shape is roughly elliptical with an elongated bright central region of asymmetric brightness distribution. An elongated bright knot pointing North-East of the central "nucleus'' leads to a morphology similar to that of Fairall 301. The bluest knot in the star forming region has a B-R color of 1.1, suggesting the presence of an evolved stellar population. The surface brightness distribution is consistent with a dominant r1/4 law, in agreement with another photometric observation of this galaxy ([Kunth et al.1988]).
The companion exhibits a high surface brightness knot and a tail
extending opposite to the direction of the main galaxy. The bright
compact knot of the companion is very red (B-R 1.8) and may be
the obscured nucleus. The star forming region extends across the
whole companion (
), a possible consequence of the
gravitational interaction between the two galaxies.
Both galaxies have dominant exponential surface brightness profiles with very steep surface brightness gradients in B and R, but departures from the pure exponential law are obvious.
Salzer et al. (1989b) give a total B magnitude of 14.14, and a B-R color of 1.24 for UM 465A, in fair agreement with our values.
The two "nuclei'' do not have the same color: the brighter (B =
17.41) is bluer (B-R 0.5) compared to the other with B = 18.62
and B-R
1.1. The surface brightness distribution is composite
and is fitted by the sum of two exponential laws. The outer envelope
(beyond B = 26.75 mag/arcsec2 and R = 26 mag/arcsec2) has a very
shallow brightness gradient. Moreover, the HI maps obtained by
Van Zee et al. (1998) indicates a velocity gradient within the galaxy
along the same axis defined by the two star forming knots, while the
nominal
kinematic center more or less coincides with the reddest knot. The
morphology of this object could suggest the merging of two dwarf
galaxies before final relaxation or dynamical reconfiguration.
Salzer et al. (1989b) give a total B magnitude of 16.35 with B-R = 0.93, in acceptable agreement with our values: B = 16.18 and B-R = 0.73.
Bohuski et al. (1978) give B = 17.69 inside an aperture of 11.6'', in agreement with our measured B value of 18.10 mag in the same aperture.
Tololo 1924-416 has a very faint neighbour (mb = 17.8) separated by 142'' North-West from the BCDG (or 24 kpc, at the same distance). This galaxy looks like a Magellanic dwarf of low surface brightness with a B-R color of 1.3 similar to that of the UM 465 companion. The external isophotes of Tololo 1924-416 extend towards the faint object. The surface brightness distribution of the candidate companion can be fitted by an exponential law with large uncertainties in the fit due to a lower signal-to-noise. At the time this article was written, the nature of this neighbour was not known; since then, its recession velocity was measured by [Östlin et al.(1998)] confirming that it is indeed a companion of Tololo 1924-416.
In the contour plot of Tololo 1924-416 (in Fig. 1), we have removed the foreground galactic star located slightly off the center of the galaxy.
In Paper I, we concluded that the 23 BCDGs from the Byurakan Surveys could be subdivided in three groups according to their surface brightness distribution: 10 objects clearly dominated by a "spheroidal'' component fitted by a dominant de Vaucouleurs (r1/4) law, 7 objects clearly dominated by an exponential brightness distribution, and 6 composite or unclassifiable profiles. With this limited northern sample, we found that about 3/4 of our objects belong to the two first categories.
In the present sample, we find a similar repartition of our BCDGs in the three groups just defined: 12 objects are dominated by an exponential component (7 are fitted by a pure exponential law), 12 are dominated by a r1/4 law (5 are fitted by a pure r1/4 law). By "pure'' we mean that no other significant component has to be added to account for all the light of the galaxy. For the total sample of 44 Northern and Southern galaxies (1 companion included), we find that: 11 galaxies (25%) have SB profiles following closely a pure exponential distribution, and 8 (18%) galaxies with composite profiles in which the exponential component dominates; 9 galaxies (20%) have SB profiles following closely a pure r1/4 distribution, and 12 galaxies (27%) with composite profiles in which the r1/4 component dominates; finally, 3 galaxies are unclassifiable (7%), those peculiar galaxies are Mk 1499, Mk 1131 and SBS 1331+493 (Paper I).
Therefore, we support that the global structure of BCDGs, traced by their projected luminosity density, is not different, in terms of dynamical components, from the global structure in normal galaxies where two main stellar populations dominate. Those components are thick disks (whose true axial ratio distribution remains to be determined in the disk dominated BCDG galaxian population, see Sung et al. 1998), and spheroidal components obeying the r1/4 law (implying a significant degree of relaxation). The present 20 disk-dominated BCDGs will be used to derive tight constraints on the true axial ratios of the disks, this will be treated in a following paper. In any case, kinematical data are also necessary, in addition to photometry of a larger sample of objects. Regarding the dynamics of the BCDGs, both exponential and r1/4, we insist that a deeper analysis requires kinematical data from the gas and stellar populations.
The use of the light distribution to trace the mass distribution can be done to some extent, keeping in mind that the mass-to-light ratio usually varies within the galaxies, as indicated by the color gradient in BCDGs ([Papaderos et al.1996b]; [Doublier et al.1997] and this work). The central starburst dominated regions have mass-to-light ratio close to 0.1 ([Charlot et al.1996]) in the visual, while the outer old star population dominated regions ([Thuan1983]; [Hunter & Gallagher1985]; [Doublier et al.1999]) would have a mass-to-light ratio larger than 1. As a result, the mass distribution would flatten towards the center compared to the light distribution. Nevertheless, studies of the light profile in the near-infrared ([Doublier et al.1999]) shows that BCDGs with "optical'' r1/4 law profiles display r1/4 law profiles in the K band where the old stellar population dominates without a light excess in the central parts. This leads us to believe that the r1/4 law is intrinsic, rather than being due to the light excess caused by the presence of the star formation regions.
In Tables 5 and 6, we summarize the parameters derived from our photometric analysis. The surface brightness profiles were fitted uniquely either by a r1/4 law or an exponential law. If neither case applies, a note in the last column of Tables 5 and 6 mentions that the surface brightness is "composite''.
The parameters of the exponential law and of the de Vaucouleurs (r1/4) law were estimated using a crossed-linear regression applied to the regions that were not affected by the central "bulge-like'' component (in case of the exponential law) and seeing (in case of the de Vaucouleurs law), and excluding the outermost isophotes where the signal-to-noise ratio is too low. In a following section, we discuss the "extra'' components such as the central excess of light, or any possible excess of light present in the low S/N regions of the galaxies.
The excess of light in the central regions is probably due to the star forming regions: the method described by De Vaucouleurs (1959) we used to derive our surface photometry defines the center as the photometric center, while for ellipses fitting of the isophotes the center of the galaxy is defined as the center of last inner ellipse. We have tried the ellipses fitting on some of the most clumpy BCDGs in our sample, and the results are sensibly in agreement (within a few percent) in the outer regions, while the fit diverge considerably in the central regions.
The excess of light compared to a pure exponential law, or to the de Vaucouleurs law, seen in the outer parts of some BCDGs is not likely due to large errors (see surface brightness distributions in Fig. 1). In some cases, it could be attributed to an old, very low surface brightness component, whether this component could be exponential or r1/4 is not clear. This component is detected in few cases (UM 465A, Fairall 301) in the near IR ([Doublier et al.1999]).
Figure 2 displays the surface brightness distributions of the
r1/4 BCDGs in the [,
] plane, where
is the surface brightness in mag/arcsec2, and
the
effective radius defined in Sect. 3.3.1 (a similar plot can be found
in Paper I, for the northern sample). The plotted line represents the
relations between the reduced radius and the surface brightness for a
pure de Vaucouleurs law. Most of the r1/4 profiles show a much
steeper slope than the de Vaucouleurs relation. We discuss this
difference in terms of the surface brightness gradient in the next section.
The most natural explanation is that the effective radius is
overestimated. The overestimation of could result from
errors in extrapolating the asymptotic magnitudes; however, we
performed the surface photometry several times showing that the
internal consistency of the asymptotic magnitude values is good. Then
the excess
values could result from the presence of a small
compact component of a small scale length in the central part of the
BCDG.
To investigate this hypothesis, we have simulated 3 types of galaxies:
a pure elliptical, a dominant elliptical with a small additional
r1/4 central component, and a dominant elliptical with a small
exponential central component. Seeing effects have been added by means
of a convolution of the model galaxies with a Gaussian. The model
images have subsequently been submitted to the surface photometry
procedure, yielding a clear tendency to overestimate the resulting
of the "Host galaxy + Starburst component'' whatever the
nature of the starburst component.
To check the consistency of the fit to the r1/4 law, we have
performed tests by subtracting the model r1/4 SB
distribution that best fits from the observed SB. Figures 2b and 3c
displays, as an example, the results on Mk 996 and II SZ 34 in B and
R. The value
of
for II SZ 34 shows local maxima at 5, 15 and 30'' from
the center,
implying local significant departures from the pure r1/4 law in
these regions. These local departures originate from the fact that not
all the star formation regions are concentrated in the central parts of
the galaxies. This is commonly encountered in almost all
"spheroidal'' BCDGs of our sample.
The mean value of the scale length parameter is 1.63 kpc-1
without taking into account the scale length value of the first
component of UM 461 (7.57 0.1 (kpc-1)) that may be due to
the two very bright nuclei.
Figure 3 (bottom panel) shows the relation between the scale length in B and R. The relation shows that the scale lengths in B and R are well correlated. The disks should have similar stellar distribution in R and in B. In some cases, the B scale length is significantly larger than the R scale length.
Figures 3b and 3c show the variation for UM 465A, as a function of
the equivalent radius, in B and R. As for the de Vaucouleurs profiles,
the
show small variations larger than the mean scale length that
account for the existence of small structures within the disk of
the galaxy: off-centered star formation regions, foreground faint
stars, and globular clusters.
The disks and de Vaucouleurs parameters describing the galaxies are listed in Tables 5 and 6 respectively.
We call "composite'' SB profiles that cannot be fitted by a pure
exponential or a pure r1/4 law. The shapes of these profiles (in B
and R) can be very different from one galaxy to another. In most
cases, two components are easily seen, the observed profiles being the
sums of an exponential and a r1/4, as in giant spirals, with one
of these components being more or less dominant. However, for some
other galaxies, the profiles displayed in the [,
] plane
show a convex shape but when displayed in the [r1/4,
]plane, the profiles exhibit a concave shape. Also, these galaxies show
very disturbed isophotes. These systems may be relaxing merger
remnants, or they could have a thick disk not yet settled inside a
host elliptical galaxy.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)