![]() |
Figure 6:
Comparison between the total apparent magnitude ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 7: Comparison between the effective radius obtained with elliptical and circular aperture photometry. The leftmost object corresponds to NGC 5229 |
![]() |
Figure 8: Comparison between the effective surface brightness obtained with elliptical and circular aperture photometry. The leftmost object corresponds to NGC 5229 |
As can be seen in the plots for the exponential fit parameters and
, Figs. 9 and 10, the circular apertures
yield slightly larger scale-lengths and lower central
surface brightnesses on average than the elliptical apertures.
![]() |
Figure 9: Comparison between the central extrapolated surface brightness obtained with elliptical and circular aperture photometry |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Comparison between the exponential profile parameter ![]() |
T.B. and B.B. thank the Swiss National Science Foundation for financial support. We also thank Frank Thim for taking part in the observing run and the referee for useful comments.
This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as well as NASA's Astrophysics Data System Abstract Service.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)