The flux calibration has been performed using spectra of the kinematical template stars common with the KPNO Coudé Feed Spectrophotometric Library (The Jones library - see Leitherer et al. 1996). The spectra in this library are flux-calibrated and can be regarded as "approximately spectrophotometric'' (Worthey & Ottaviani 1997). Seven late-type stars observed by us could be used for that purpose, totalling 11 spectra. The wavelength response of the system (atmosphere + telescope + spectrograph + CCD) was modelled by a second degree polynomial.
This small number of flux calibrators does not allow to perform a
monitoring of the change in the atmospheric absorption, hence we
determined the error due to the change in the flux calibration by
comparing the -values obtained with the 11 different response functions.
Assuming that the distribution of these 11 calibrations is
representative of changes of the flux calibration during the whole runs,
we found the corresponding error on
to be
0
004.
Recently Worthey & Ottaviani (1997) provided an elaborate
mapping of the Lick system resolution which is about 8.4 Å at
5300 Å. Our spectra were transformed to this resolution by convolving
them with an appropriate gaussian. The raw values of -indices,
(
)
, were measured according to the Lick definition
(see Worthey et al.1994):
![]() |
(3) |
where is the flux
(in ergs s-1 cm-2 Å-1) in the Mg H and Mg b
which are located at
- 5196.625 Å.
Here the local continuum,
, represents the run of flux defined by a line connecting the
flux levels at midpoints of the corresponding blue and red "continuum''
bandpasses (which are actually pseudocontinua) at
Å and
Å.
For each individual spectrum the Mg2-index error was first estimated as described in Cardiel et al.(1998), then the flux-calibration error was added quadratically to the obtained value.
We performed a series of tests to determine the sensitivity of our
measurements to different sources of errors.
The dominant uncertainty comes from the photon
noise (typically 0
007).
The uncertainty on the flux calibration and on the sky subtraction come
after (the overall effect of both these sources of errors
is
0
006).
![]() |
(4) |
This correction (typically 0
002) is in general
well within the errors, but we applied it because it may bias the
measurements in a systematic way.
The mean aperture correction added to the raw measurements is
-0016 with an rms of 0
012. The negative mean correction
reflects the fact that our observations sample a physical aperture
smaller than the normalisation aperture adopted in HYPERCAT
(Golev & Prugniel 1998).
Inverting Eq. (3) from Golev & Prugniel tells that in average the
apertures used in our observations are 0.4 the normalisation radius.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)