Eight of the 38 EMSS clusters contain giant arcs. To extract quantitative information from cluster gravitational lenses, one needs a large, homogeneous, well-selected sample of clusters for which there exist measurements of the lengths, widths, radii of curvature, positions and orientations of any gravitational images. Arc lengths and widths are related to the size and ellipticity of the sources, while arc widths are also strongly affected by the steepness of the cluster mass density profile. The radii of curvature and orientation of the arcs depend primarily on the potential of the clusters, providing important clues about the density profile and mass substructure.
We note that making these measurements and attempting to force
the often complex lensing configurations into a simplified geometry
is difficult and problematic. We choose to list the arc location
with respect to the brightest cluster member, which is often
not the true center of mass. Measuring the arc length, width, and
especially the radius of curvature is more difficult. The arcs often
have structure along their length and variation in their width, and are
usually too short for an accurate determination of their radius of
curvature, . In spite of these difficulties, we at least attempt to
estimate these quantities and list them in the tables for future use.
We measure the arc total magnitudes by integrating all the flux from
the arc to the point where the lowest isophote blends into the local
sky background. In some cases where the arc is embedded in the halo
of one or more galaxies, the flux from the arc is contaminated
by light from this halo, and we attempt to subtract the halo
flux in order to measure the true arc magnitude.
In Table 2 we list the observed properties of all the arcs in the
eight clusters that contain at least one giant arc. Refer to the
diagram in Fig. 1 where we illustrate the various arc geometry
terms. Columns (1), (2), and (3) contain the cluster name,
the cluster (lens) redshift (zl), and the arc name or label
respectively.
The length, l, seeing-deconvolved width, w, axis ratio l/w, and
radius of curvature , are listed in Cols. (4), (5), (6) and (7).
The radius of curvature can be determined
by measuring the chord length across the two ends of the arc, and the
sagittal depth from the arc to this chord, assuming the arc is circular.
Column (8) contains the distance,
, from the (approximate) center
of the arc to the center of the cluster. Often the
true cluster center is ill defined, so for our purposes, we take the
position of the optically dominant galaxy as the cluster center unless
otherwise specified. The angle
listed in Col. (9) refers to the angular position of the center
of the arc with respect
to the center of the cluster, where 0
is defined as north
and positive rotations are measured in the counterclockwise direction,
while the angle
, listed in Col. (10), is a measure of the
orientation of the arc with respect to the cluster radius vector (again
the ccw direction is positive). Column (11) contains the (approximate)
position of the center of curvature (
,
) with respect to
the cluster center. These numbers are given in arcsec with E and N being
the positive directions. Columns (12), (13) and (14) list the B and R
magnitudes and (B-R) colors of the arcs (note, V and I magnitudes
for some of the arcs can also be found in LeFèvre et al.1994). Finally,
Col. (15) contains references to more detailed studies for each cluster.
In the following subsections, we describe each giant arc system in detail.
MS0302.7+1658 at z=0.426 was the first EMSS cluster
found to contain a lensed arc (see Fig. 2).
The arc is first mentioned by Giraud (1991).
Mathez et al.(1992) presented detailed observations of the cluster and 3
arcs: the long (), so-called "straight'' arc A1 located between
the two bright elliptical galaxies G1 and G2 (in the Mathez et al.
labelling); a shorter arc A2 (l
8'') to the
south of the brightest cluster galaxy G1;
and a faint arc A1W attached to the western end
of A1. Giraud (1992) also showed limited evidence for variability in two
additional arclets seen in images taken in 1989 and 1991.
Models by Mathez et al.reproduce the geometry and shape of the arcs for
assumed redshifts of
and
for
A1 and A2 respectively.
In our R-band CCD images taken in seeing
we can easily see the 3 large arcs. We do not see the arclets mentioned
by Giraud (1992). In Fig. 3, we also show a true color
image of the cluster core where we used the I, R and V frames
for the rgb colors. The giant arc between galaxies G1 and G2
(a combination of A1 and A1W) is over 20'' long and
appears to be circular centered on G1. However upon closer inspection,
we verify that the western and eastern components of A1 are both
more-or-less straight and are folded at the point where they join
to appear concave. Mathez et al.modeled the cluster potential as a
bimodal configuration with the main mass deflector located near the
position of the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) and
the secondary deflector located near the second ranked galaxy to the
NW. This model is the simplest way to produce "straight'' arc images
as in the example of A2390 (Pello et al.1991;
Pierre et al.1996).
Fabricant et al.(1994) have obtained spectra of a number of
galaxies in MS0302+1658 (as well as the neighboring cluster
MS0302+1717) and find the cluster has a velocity dispersion
of 921+192-123 kms-1. They also observe
photometric and spectroscopic evidence of galaxy evolution (i.e. the
Butcher-Oemler effect) with of the galaxies having strong
Balmer absorption and emission lines indicative of a recent episode
of star formation. Carlberg et al.(1996) measure a lower value for
the velocity dispersion of 646
93 km s-1 using 27 galaxies.
Ellingson et al.(1997) have produced a photometric and
spectroscopic catalog for the galaxies in MS0302+1658
bringing the total number of cluster members with measured redshifts
to 94, but a new value for the velocity dispersion has
not been published yet.
Kaiser et al.(1998) have performed a weak lensing study
of the supercluster at 0.4 using deep I and V band
images taken with the UH8K mosaic camera at the CFHT. The
supercluster is composed by the three clusters MS0302.7+1658
at z=0.426, MS0302.5+1717 at z=0.425
(both X-ray selected) and of the optically selected cluster
CL0303+17, at z=0.418, discovered by
Dressler
& Gunn in 1992. All of the major concentrations apparent in the X-ray
and optical images are detected in the mass reconstructions, and
indicate that most of the super-cluster mass, like the
early type galaxies, is concentrated in the three X-ray clusters.
A mean mass to light ratio for the clusters of
M/LB 260 h is obtained. The implication of the results
for the cosmological density parameter is also discussed.
MS0440+0204 at z=0.190 is an optically poor cluster with
a compact, multiple-nucleus cD galaxy surrounded by a large halo in which
are embedded a number of blue, circular structures that appear to be
lensed arcs and arclets (Luppino et al.1993). The largest arc has
a length and remains unresolved in
seeing. Most of
the arcs and arclets lie on or near a 24'' (100h50-1
kpc) radius critical line. Luppino et al.computed an enclosed mass and
central mass-to-light ratio of
and
110
respectively assuming a source redshift
of
. This cluster has been studied
in detail by Gioia et al.(1998a) who present a combined analysis
of X-ray imaging and spectroscopic data and HST data. From possible
multiple images formed by gravitational lensing of five background
sources, Gioia et al.derive limits to the mass distribution in the
range 50-100 h50-1 kpc. For the central
100h50-1 kpc region, the possible range in
projected mass is
h50-1
.
At about 600 kpc from the center of the cluster a simple
model
fit to the X-ray data yields a mass of (1.3
0.2) 1014
.At 100 kpc, the lower limit mass from lensing is a factor 2 greater than
the X-ray determined mass. In order to reconcile
the different mass estimates, Gioia et al.tentatively explore a model
where the mass profile increases more rapidly than the X-ray
model
at large radii.
The high X-ray luminosity is confirmed by Donahue & Stocke (1995)
who obtained a 16 ksec ROSAT PSPC image of MS0451-0305.
They also see a slight elongation
of the X-ray isophotes with roughly the same EW orientation as the
optical galaxies. Donahue (1996) has also obtained ASCA data
that yield a high value for the temperature of 10.4 1.2 keV.
Combining the temperature of the gas with the image parameters of the
ROSAT PSPC, Donahue obtains a total mass within a radius of
1 h-150 Mpc
of 9.7
h-150
. This value
is in agreement with the masses implied by both the virial estimates
using the velocity dispersion of 1371 km s-1 reported by the
CNOC group (Carlberg et al.1996, see also
Ellingson et al.1998, for a
spectrophotometric catalog of the cluster galaxies) and with the
weak lensing results by Clowe (1998).
Our deep CCD images reveal a rich cluster with a giant
arc and at least one smaller arclet (see Figs. 2, 4 and 5).
A true color image is shown in Fig. 4. This image is a
750 750 pixel subarray extracted
from the much larger 20482 CCD frames, and
was produced using the I, R, and V CCD images (UH 88-inch)
for the rgb colors. The integration times and seeing (FWHM) in the
3 colors were 4200s and
in I, 7200s
and
in R, and 8400s and
in V. The color
image measures
corresponding to 1.2 Mpc
1.2 Mpc in the cluster frame
(7.39 kpc/arcsec at z=0.55 for H0=50,
).
The cluster has an obviously flattened (EW) morphology with red
galaxies that are easily distinguished from the blue field population.
Note that the core of the cluster appears to contain 2 bright galaxies, but
the true color image reveals that the southern bright galaxy
is quite blue and appears to be a foreground, face-on spiral.
The high contrast image in Fig. 5 is the sum of the V, R and I
frames and is displayed to reveal the details of the giant arc, A1 and
the bright arclet A2.
Arc A1 is long and is located
E of the
brightest cluster galaxy. It appears to be marginally
resolved, has variable surface brightness, and at least 1 break along
its length. Upon close inspection,
A1 appears to be another example of a "straight'' arc, but precise
measurement of the radius of curvature is difficult. We find a center-to-edge
deviation from linearity of
1 pixel over the
41 pixel length
of the arc, allowing us to place a lower limit
on the radius of curvature of
--only slightly larger than the distance to the
BCG. Arclet A2 is
long, and is located 22'' NW of the
BCG. Lines drawn normal to this arclet and normal to arc A1 intersect at
a point
W of the BCG. This point is
40''
from A1 and is more consistent with the
measured for A1.
A2 also appears to be curved and its approximate center is consistent
with this location.
In many ways, arc A1 resembles the original "straight'' arc in the
z=0.231 cluster A2390 (Pello et al.1991; Pierre et al.1996).
The A2390 arc is resolved, has breaks along its length,
and has a spectroscopically-measured redshift of z=0.913.
Both the MS0451-0305 arc A1 and the A2390
arc are orthogonal to the optical and X-ray
major axes of their respective clusters (i.e. the arcs trace
ellipses aligned with the optical and/or X-ray major axes).
As we mentioned above, the lower limit on for A1
in MS0451-03 is not significantly larger than the distance
to the BCG and is reasonably consistent with the intersection point
of the normals of A1 and A2. However, if
, then, as in the
case of A2390, we require a secondary mass concentration to the East
of the cluster where there is no excess of optical galaxies,
suggesting the presence of clumped dark matter.
However, a possible alternative way to produce nearly straight, elongated images is with a "marginal'' lens (Kovner 1987b), i.e. a cluster with a relatively large core radius. In such cases, we would expect to see larger arc widths than with the small core radii clusters, whose arcs would be thin. Since the large arc in MS0451-03 is marginally resolved, we must consider this situation seriously. Note, however, that the orientation of the arc, with respect to both the optical and X-ray major axes, supports our initial statement that the mass density profile is compact, and thus our interpretation that the shape of arc A1 implies mass substructure is the preferred one.
MS0451.6-0305 is in the list of clusters detected by Doug Clowe (1998) using weak gravitational lensing. The mass distribution created with the Kaiser & Squires algorithm (1993) is centered on the bright central galaxy, but the broad EW structure evident in the galaxy distribution is absent. Instead a moderately large northern extension from the central peak present in the mass distribution is consistent with a (much weaker) structure seen in the cluster galaxy distribution.
MS1006+1202 is a moderately luminous ( 1044
ergs-1)
cluster at z=0.221 with a flattened (NS), irregular
morphology and an optical core containing
a number of overlapped galaxy images, but with a central galaxy that
has neither the size nor brightness to be called a cD.
DSG have detected H
and [NII] emission suggesting the presence
of a cooling flow. Carlberg et al.(1996), measure a velocity dispersion of
906 km s-1 from 26 cluster members.
This cluster contains a remarkable assortment of faint, blue,
linear structures that appear to be lensed images (LeFèvre et al.1994).
There are three arclets, A1, A2, and A3, located to the North of the BCG.
All three arclets are oriented roughly perpendicular to the
major axis of the optical galaxy distribution (see the image in
Fig. 2, this paper, and in Fig. 1a in LeFèvre etal.).
The arclets have lengths ranging
from
for A3 to
for A1. All three
appear to be marginally resolved and have no apparent curvature,
but they are so short that any slight curvature would be difficult to
recognize. Furthermore, some portions of these arclets may be obscured
by a bright (
) star located near the arclet positions.
Presumably arclets A2 and A3 could be 2 pieces of the same large
arc since lines extending perpendicular from the centers of
these arclets intersect at the same point
to the SW,
and the break between the two arclets occurs close to the foreground
star. The length of A2 and A3 combined is
.The longest single arc-like structure, A4,
is located 67'' NW of the BCG and is
long.
There is some question whether this particular object is
truly a gravitational lens image. The arc appears to be linear,
with galaxies apparently at both ends, and might possibly be some
kind of tidal tail from an interacting system.
If A4 is a gravitational image, then this cluster may have a
peculiar underlying mass distribution. The absence of curvature for
A4 suggests the presence of a secondary deflector to the West, where
there is no obvious excess of optical galaxies (see the wide field
CCD image in Gioia & Luppino 1994).
Furthermore, the orientation of A4 is odd when compared
to the more-or-less orthogonal orientation of A1-3, although without
detailed modelling, it is difficult to say anything quantitative at
this time.
Again, we note that an alternative interpretation is to
consider this cluster an example of a marginal lens with a large
core radius, rather than considering the absence of curvature in the
arcs as evidence for invisible mass substructure.
MS1358+6245 is a very rich cluster at z=0.328 and is
extremely X-ray luminous with 1045 ergs-1.
This cluster has been the focus of a number of investigations of
galaxy evolution in distant, X-ray selected clusters (Luppino et al.
1991; Fabricant et al.1991; Annis 1994;
Kelson et al.1997), and
displays the Butcher-Oemler effect with a photometrically
and spectroscopically determined blue galaxy fraction of
. During the course of these various investigations,
lensed arcs were looked for but not seen, probably because
the typical seeing in these data was of order 1.3''-1.5''.
From WFPC2 images obtained with HST, Franx et al.(1997)
discovered serendipitously an extremely red arc. Keck II spectra of the
arc revealed to be the lensed image of a galaxy at z=4.92, among the
most distant galaxies known. Both Yee et al.(1998)
and Fisher et al.(1998), have performed a spectroscopic
survey of this rich cluster. Yee et al.find evidence for a second
cluster at the same redshift as MS1358+6245, located at
the southern edge of the central cluster field.
From their catalog of 232 cluster members Fisher et al.(1998)
derive a mean redshift of z=0.3283
0.0003 and a velocity
dispersion of 1027+51-45 km s-1 in fair
agreement the value of 987
54 determined by Carlberg et al.
(1997). Fisher et al.(1998) show that there is significant
evidence for substructure in the central part of the cluster and
that the distribution of line-of-sight velocities departs significantly
from a Gaussian. They identify two subgroups with at least 10-20
members and dispersions of
400 km s-1. Note that they
concentrate on the main body of the cluster and that the second
concentration found by Yee et al.south of the cluster center is outside
the Fisher et al.field limits. The presence of two subclumps in the cluster,
implies that MS1358+6245 has not yet
reached equilibrium and is still in the process of virialization
and accretion of new members.
van Dokkum et al.(1998) investigate the
color-magnitude relation for MS1358+6245
using a wide-field mosaic of multicolor WFPC2 images.
A weak lensing study by Hoekstra et al.(1998), finds a total projected
mass within 1 Mpc h-150 of (4.4
0.6)
and
a M/L ratio = (90
13) h50
consistent with
being constant with radius. These authors use the maximum probability
extension of the original Kaiser & Squires (1993)
algorithm and compare the resulting mass map to the result from a finite
field construction algorithm developed by Seitz & Schneider
(1996 and 1998). MS1358+6245 was also studied
with ROSAT and ASCA by Bautz et al.(1997), and
by Allen (1998).
The results by Allen, who takes into account the effects of cooling
flows on the X-ray images and spectra, imply a projected mass of
4.2+4.1-0.8
in excellent agreement with
the weak lensing mass by Hoekstra et al.(1998).
As part of this survey, we obtained R-band images in seeing
with the UH 2.2m telescope and V-band images in
seeing with HRCam on the CFHT. Although there are no bright
arcs visible, we did find a large, very faint, curved arc located to the SW
of the central galaxies, which corresponds to the red arc
serendipitously discovered by Franx et al.(1997). The arc is barely
discernable when the R-band image is displayed with "normal''
contrast at the top of Fig. 6, but can be seen clearly
in the high contrast image in the lower panel.
The same faint, curved structure is also present in our
V-band CFHT images. The arc is located 23'' (133
kpc)
from the BCG and is 17'' long with a small
radius of curvature of
(75
kpc).
The center of curvature is displaced 13'' SW of the BCG.
MS1621+2640 is an optically rich cluster at z=0.426
with one large, faint arc located close to the second brightest cluster
galaxy (Luppino & Gioia 1992). The cluster X-ray luminosity is
ergs-1. Note the
listed
in the original Luppino & Gioia (1992) paper assumed q0=0 and
used a point source correction rather than the cluster extended
emission correction as applied later by Henry et al.(1992) and
Gioia & Luppino (1994), and as used in this survey.
Ellingson et al.(1997) published photometric and redshift catalogs of
galaxies in the field of the cluster as part of the CNOC
cluster redshift survey.
The arc is long, has a patchy surface brightness,
and has a very small radius of curvature
(
). The arc is located
from the
BCG and the center of curvature appears to be located
S of galaxy 2, between it and the BCG.
MS2053-0449 has a redshift of z=0.583 and an X-ray
luminosity 5.78 ergs-1.
It is not very optically rich, especially when compared with
its other z
0.5 EMSS counterparts like
MS0016+1609 or MS0451-0305.
Luppino & Gioia (1992) presented high resolution (
seeing)
V band images of MS2053-0449 taken with HRCam on the CFHT
that revealed a large arc-like structure located
16'' from the
BCG. The arc is
11'' long and breaks into 2 distinct clumps,
labeled A and B, with a center of curvature that appears to be close
to the position of the BCG. Luppino & Gioia also noted a very
faint arclet, labeled C, located closer in to the BCG.
Clowe (1998) presents a weak lensing
study for this cluster which is the least massive of the clusters in the EMSS. The mass profile, generated by aperture densitometry is
well fit by a "universal'' CDM profile (Navarro et al.1996)
with parameters r200=520 h-1 kpc and c=2 assuming a background
galaxy redshift
. MS2053-0449 is also well fit
by an isothermal sphere model with a velocity dispersion of
km s-1 for
, indicating that the cluster is close
to virialization.
Kelson et al.(1997), measure structural parameters and central velocity dispersions for the galaxies in MS2053-0449 to define the fundamental plane relation in a cluster at intermediate redshift. They find that the fundamental plane relation of galaxies is very similar to that of Coma, suggesting that the structure of the early-type galaxies has changed little since z=0.58.
MS2137-2353 is a very X-ray luminous cluster (ergs-1) at z=0.313 with a large, curved arc and the first
reported case of a radial gravitational image (Fort et al.1992). The radial
image is embedded in the halo of the optically dominant galaxy and is best
seen in the HST image of Hammer et al.(1997).
The unique lensing configuration, with both a tangential and radial image
and 3 arclets, allowed Mellier, Fort et al.(1993) to develop a
tightly constrained mass distribution model with only 2 free
parameters (core radius and velocity
dispersion) that fit the large arcs and predicted the positions of the 3
arclets. Their model assumed an elliptical cluster potential (circular
being ruled out due to the absence of a counter-arc). They found a
centrally-peaked mass distribution with a finite core radius that has
a value of kpc; considerably smaller
than the core radii derived from X-ray measurements, and in agreement
with the general trend that lensing clusters have centrally peaked mass
density profiles. Allen (1998) shows that the strong gravitational
lensing and X-ray mass measurements for this cooling-flow cluster
are in excellent agreement, implying that the thermal pressure dominates
over non-thermal processes in the support of the X-ray gas against
gravity in the central regions of the cooling-flow clusters, and
also validating the hydrostatic assumptions used in the X-ray mass
determination.
Hammer et al.(1997) studied in detail the core of this
cluster using WFPC2 images. An analysis of the lensing properties
of the dark matter component indicates that within 30 to 150 h50-1
kpc from the mass center, the major axis and ellipticity of the dark matter
component are in rather good agreement with those derived from X-ray
and visible light, while the dark matter profile has a slope much flatter
than that of the visible light (0.875 for the dark matter profile
vs. 1.35 for the visible light profile). MS2137-2353 is
a good example of an essentially relaxed cluster, as is the case for
cooling-flow clusters, with an increasing mass-to-light ratio from
the very center to 150 h50-1 kpc.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)