next previous
Up: The limb flare of


5 Conclusion

1.
It has appeared to be possible, to explain the main qualities of the flare within the framework of a closed configuration.
2.
Studying how the pre-flare spatial structure developed has revealed the regions in which the line-of-sight component of the magnetic field had the opposite direction. The LCP-region was almost enveloped by the RCP one. In the course of the flare, energy release sites appeared near the boundary between these regions.

3.
Microwave sources of different origin were observed during the flare. The source with the spectral turnover frequency <10 GHz corresponded to the energy release site and provided the main contribution into the total flux of the burst in the initial phase of the flare. When the burst reached its peak, the turnover frequency became two times more. Trapped electrons were responsible for the most part of the microwave emission during the impulsive phase.

4.
The steady exponential growth of the brightness temperature and the flux of the microwave emission went on in the initial stage of the flare during an interval as long as almost 5 time constants. Sources essentially changed their spatial structure during this stage. So the development of the flare was conducted by some large-scale instability.

5.
Sub-second pulses observed at 5.7 GHz during the impulsive phase were generated in the optically thin source which was observed in hard X-rays at a height of $34\ 10^3$ km. The compact source of the sub-second pulses at 17 GHz was due to gyrosynchrotron emission of electrons with the energy of 1-2 MeV. It had the size of $2\ 10^3$ km and was located at a height of $15\ 10^3$ km.

6.
The energy release had not yet terminated during the post-flare stage till at least 06:00. Two regions of energy release can be followed in this stage: the upper one where the two opposite magnetic ropes contacted, and the lower one where the microwave sub-bursts of non-thermal origin occurred. Free-free emission from soft X-ray loops then became predominant.

Acknowledgements

A. Altyntsev and V. Grechnev use this opportunity to express their thanks for hospitality and help from the Nobeyama Solar Group during their work in Nobeyama Radio Observatory. We thank Dr. B. Lubyshev and Ms. G. Zubkova for a preliminary analysis of the SSRT data. We are greatly indebted to Dr. R. Ramaty for his kindness, to have made his code for calculation of gyrosynchrotron emission available for us. Part of this work was supported by the Russian projects of RFFI No. 96-02-16648, No. 97-02-16906 and Astronomia.


next previous
Up: The limb flare of

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)