Up: The Medicina survey of GHz
Subsections
During the survey 42 maser sources were detected out of
429 observed positions.
Spectra of the sources are presented in Fig. 1, and the measured parameters
are given in Table 1.
Columns 1 - 3 are self-explanatory;
Cols. 4 - 6 present the peak velocity, velocity
range of the 6.7 GHz emission, and the flux density of the strongest feature,
respectively. Columns 7-8 present near and far kinematic
distance of the source.
No measurable difference has been found between right and left
polarizations.
List of non-detections is in Table 2, given in electronic form;
the typical detection
limit for these sources is about 3 Jy.
After completion of our observations papers by
Walsh et al. (1995);
van der Walt et al. (1995)
and Lyder & Galt (1997) appeared where
independent discovery of several 6.7 GHz masers is reported.
Table 1:
Parameters of detected sources. BO, WC and HII in the last
column mean that a source is associated with a bipolar outflow,
an IRAS object that satisfy the WC colour criteria, or HII object
from Helfand et al. (1992), respectively
 |
Thirty-six masers were detected towards WC objects.
In bipolar outflows nine masers were found, and all of them are
associated with high-luminosity IRAS sources.
Thus, the majority of the detections are associated with
IRAS objects. However, not all of them
satisfy the colour criteria by Wood & Churchwell.
No masers were found
in the vicinity of young stars of low and intermediate luminosity.
These cases are discussed in Sect. 4.
![\begin{figure}
\includegraphics [height=21.5cm]{fig1-1.eps}\end{figure}](/articles/aas/full/1999/01/ds1575/Timg6.gif) |
Figure 1:
Spectra of sources, observed at 6.7 GHz. Spectra of
sources 17436-2806, 17463-3128, 18151-1208, L379IRS2, 18316-0602,
18572+0057, 78.12+3.63 are shown with the velocity resolution 0.07 km s-1.
For the rest of the sources the velocity resolution was 0.27 km s-1. Dashed lines indicate CS velocity
of the parent molecular cloud |
![\begin{figure}
{
\includegraphics [height=21.5cm]{fig1-2.eps}
}\end{figure}](/articles/aas/full/1999/01/ds1575/Timg7.gif) |
Figure 1:
continued |
![\begin{figure}
{
\includegraphics [height=21.5cm]{fig1-3.eps}
}\end{figure}](/articles/aas/full/1999/01/ds1575/Timg8.gif) |
Figure 1:
continued |
![\begin{figure}
{
\includegraphics [height=21.5cm]{fig1-4.eps}
}\end{figure}](/articles/aas/full/1999/01/ds1575/Timg9.gif) |
Figure 1:
continued |
![\begin{figure}
{
\includegraphics [height=21.5cm]{fig1-5.eps}
}\end{figure}](/articles/aas/full/1999/01/ds1575/Timg10.gif) |
Figure 1:
continued |
![\begin{figure}
{
\includegraphics [height=5cm]{fig1-6.eps}
}\end{figure}](/articles/aas/full/1999/01/ds1575/Timg11.gif) |
Figure 1:
continued |
The kinematic distances were obtained using the rotation curve by
Brand & Blitz (1993)
|  |
(1) |
where
is the linear velocity at the radius R,
and
km s-1 is the linear velocities
at the solar radius R0=8.5 kpc.
We did not attempt to resolve the ambiguity
in distance determination for several sources in which case
we report both near and
far solutions, although the near distances are more likely for a large
number of observed sources.
One can notice, that some sources have
forbidden velocities and it's impossible to calculate their kinematic
distances.
Up: The Medicina survey of GHz
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)