The CaII triplet lines () have been used as metallicity
indicators for star clusters in the Galaxy and the LMC, both in integrated spectra (BA87,
AZ88) and individual stars (Olszewski et al. 1991).
In order to determine metallicities we measure equivalent widths of the CaII triplet and
compare them to those of the high Signal/Noise Galactic globular cluster templates G5 to
G1, ranging from to nearly-solar metallicity, from
Bica (1988). In the case
of G1, the Bica (1988) template has been complemented with the M31 globular clusters of
comparable metallicity G222 and G170 (Jablonka et al. 1992)
in order to further
improve the Signal/Noise ratio. A comparison of an observed cluster spectrum with that of
the most similar (reddening-free) template gives the reddening value. The metallicity, in
turn, is determined by means of a calibration of the Ws in terms of
.
For the continuum tracing we chose one which minimises TiO contamination, similar to the low one in BA87. CMDs of bulge clusters often present underpopulated giant branches (GB), e.g. Terzan2 (Ortolani et al. 1997a) and Tonantzintla2 (Bica et al. 1996). As a consequence, stochastic effects in sampling the cool giants often occur, so that the near-infrared integrated spectrum may present strong (Tonantzintla2) or weak (Terzan2) TiO bands (Fig. 6). On the other hand, CaII arises in all spectral types from F to M (Alloin & Bica 1989), so that it is nearly independent of stochastic effects due to temperature, which makes it a reliable metallicity indicator in the integrated spectrum. Nevertheless, stochastic effects on the giant branch may affect the Caii triplet significantly, due to the strong gravity dependence (Jones et al. 1984; Alloin & Bica 1989).
The adopted continuum points are at and
,with a pivot point at
, if necessary. For the three CaII lines
the windows are from BA87:
8476 - 8520Å, 8520 - 8564Å and 8640 - 8700Å. The resulting
Ws are listed in Cols. 2-4 of Table 2, together with their sum (Col. 5).
Typical errors
were estimated from uncertainties in the continuum level and resulted in
the range 5 - 10%.
For comparison and calibration purposes, CaII triplet Ws were also measured in the same way for the
templates G1 to G5 (Table 2).
Ideally, the best spectroscopic method to determine reddening for star clusters is to have available reddening-free template spectra of similar properties, and to use a wavelength baseline as wide as possible, as in the recent study of globular clusters in NGC5128 by Jablonka et al. (1996). Although the present wavelength range is limited to the near-infrared, it can be used to constrain the reddening values.
Guided by the sum of Ws of the CaII triplet () we identify among the templates that
resembling most the cluster spectrum. Subsequently, a Seaton (1979) law was applied to
derive E(B-V). This method is illustrated in Fig. 4 for Terzan5 and Terzan9 with corresponding
templates G1 and G3, respectively. The templates and derived E(B-V) for each cluster are
given in Table 3. We present in Figs. 5 and 6 reddening-corrected spectra for the bulge
sample. Notice that in the very reddened clusters UKS1 and Liller1 (respectively E(B-V)=3.1 and 2.8) a strong absorption feature occurs at
. We emphasise that
the present spectra are corrected for the telluric A band (Sect. 2). A similar strong
feature was observed in the extremely reddened (E(B-V)=4.4) open cluster Westerlund1
(Piatti et al. 1998). This feature appears to be a diffuse interstellar band
(Sanner et al. 1978) and the present results suggest that the band is detectable in spectra
of globular clusters more reddened than E(B-V)=1.5, and becomes prominent for
(see Figs. 4, 5 and 6). The diffuse interstellar band occurs in the same spectral region
as TiO stellar bands and they are certainly blended in several spectra. However, the TiO
absorption at
might be used to infer the relative proportions of
the absorptions in the region
.
The strong-lined clusters projected on the disk result of solar metallicity
(Sect. 3.2), and their reddening-corrected spectra are shown in Fig. 7. The templates
used in the matchings were the metal-rich globular cluster templates G1 and G2 (Table 3).
Similar to CMD studies, which so far have not been able to establish the real nature of these
objects as globular clusters or very old open clusters, owing to crowding and reddening effects,
the present spectroscopic results are not conclusive, but the spectra are consistent with those
of very old clusters.
The bulge clusters HP1 and NGC6717 with 2 spatial extractions are shown in Figs. 8 and 9 respectively (see Sects. 4.5 and 4.20).
We calibrated as a function of metallicity adopting
respectively for the templates G1, G2, G3, G4 and
G5. This calibration is based on individual
of clusters in each template and
a grid of Ws as a function of metallicity (Bica & Alloin 1986a,b;
BA87; Bica 1988). The
metallicity scale is similar to that of ZW84 and the ones in
Jablonka (1992)
and Jablonka et al. (1996).
The control clusters NGC6528 and NGC6624 (Table 1), as well as 47Tucanae, have been
used in the calibration, adopting metallicity values from ZW84. The
near-infrared spectrum of 47Tuc is from Bica et al. (1992).
The resulting calibration
curve is shown in Fig. 10, and the derived values for the sample clusters are given
in Col. 4 of Table 3.
The abundance calibration of the metal-rich end is a fundamental problem in stellar
populations. The calibration problem has been recently addressed by means of high
dispersion spectra of individual stars by Barbuy et al. (1992, 1997),
deep colour magnitude
diagrams by Ortolani et al. (1995), and integrated spectra
(Santos et al. 1995), in the
study of the nearly-solar metallicity key globular clusters NGC6553 and NGC6528 (which
are part of the G1 template). The iron abundance in such clusters appears to be
somewhat under solar (
), whereas [
-elements/Fe] are enhanced,
resulting in an overall metallicity
, as herein adopted for the G1 template.
Typical errors in implied by uncertainties in the Ws are
dex.
However, owing to the fact that these bulge regions are very crowded, contamination effects
by field stars on the cluster and background regions, uncertainties may be
larger for some clusters. The present values should be taken as indicative, and for
definitive results for each cluster complementary information from deep CMDs and
spectroscopy of individual member giants would be necessary.
![]()
|
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)