All the plates were measured on a Photometric Data Systems (PDS) model
1010 automatic measuring machine at the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory
in Victoria, Canada. This microdensitometer combines an accurate,
high-speed photometer with a precise x - y coordinate scanning system to
allow the acquisition of density and position information from
photographic images. Approximate positions of all the stars were obtained
from measurements of one plate using a two-screw Mann measuring machine,
and stored in a disk file. Then a small square area around each stellar
position was scanned, using a 17 m (0
51) square aperture stepped by
17
m in x and y. A 30
30, 40
40, 50
50, or
60
60 box was scanned at each stellar position depending on the
brightness of the star, which determines the density and apparent diameter
of its image. In order to monitor the scanning stability, a "reference
loop" consisting of 15 stars spread uniformly over the plate was rescanned
at the beginning, middle, and end of the measurement of each plate.
The reduction of the relative proper motions for 540 stars to a limiting
magnitude in the region of NGC 1750 and NGC 1758 was made on
the basis of the PDS measurements by means of an approach we have adopted
many times before (Tian et al. 1982, 1983;
Zhao et al. 1981, 1993; Su et al. 1997). There are three steps in the whole process: the first is to
transform the measured results of all the plates to a common system, in
order to eliminate the errors due to small differences in the orientation
of different plates in scanning; the second step is to establish a
reference frame, i.e. to decide upon the reference stars; the last step
is to calculate proper motions of all the stars with respect to this
reference frame, and their corresponding uncertainties.
Generally, any stars can be chosen as reference stars for determining
relative proper motions. However, in order to obtain a good plate solution
and to make the absolute proper motions of the reference frame as small as
possible, our principle is to choose as many stars common to all the plate
pairs as possible, except for any stars with extraordinarily large proper
motions and stars located in the crowded central region. On the other
hand, the distribution of star images on the plate and the magnitude
distribution of the reference stars should be homogeneous. For these
reasons, after two loops of the least-squares adjustment, 300 stars with
residuals in both x and y coordinates less than 2 and
2
respectively were chosen to be reference stars from the
370 stars common to all the plate pairs, where
and
are the rms residuals in the x and y coordinates
obtained from the least-squares adjustment.
There are two ways that can be used to determine proper motions. One is known as the plate-pairs method, and another is called the central overlap technique. Owing to the limited number of reference stars and the accuracies of the proper motions of these stars, the plate-pairs technique is used in the present study. All the linear and quadratic coordinate-dependent terms and the coma term are included in the plate solutions. The weighted mean of the proper motion of a star obtained from all of the available plate pairs should be taken as the final value of the proper motion of the star. The proper motion weight for a star in a plate pair is determined from the epoch difference of the pair. As we know, accuracies of proper motions for individual stars are different, since the time baselines, number of available pairs, weather conditions of observation, exposure times, and plate washing can be different for different plate pairs. The corresponding internal standard errors can be estimated from a comparison of the proper motions obtained from different plate pairs for individual stars; the standard errors of the proper motions are very important for membership determination and dynamic studies of an open cluster.
Tables 2 and 3 give the accuracies of the final proper
motions for stars in the region of NGC 1750 and NGC 1758 with different
numbers of measured pairs (greater than 2) and different distances
from the cluster center, and in different magnitude ranges, respectively. The
units of the proper motions and their accuracies in this paper are
mas/year. It is shown from the tables that the accuracies depend strongly
on the number of plate pairs, and the greater the number of pairs, the
higher the accuracies of the final proper motions of the stars. This
shows that increasing the number of available plate pairs is very
important for improving the accuracy of proper motions. It can also be
seen from the tables that there is no obvious relation between the
accuracies of the final proper motions and the distances of stars from the
plate center or between the accuracies and the magnitudes of stars, which
shows that the imaging quality of the telescope has been very good and
that the PDS machine was quite stable. Figure 2 gives the number of
stars for which different numbers of plate-pairs are available. More than
of proper motions are obtained from more than 6 plate pairs. The
rms errors of the proper motions of all 540 stars are
=
0.63 mas/yr,
=
0.70 mas/yr, and
=
0.67 mas/yr, where
the rms proper-motions errors of the
of all stars that
were observed in more than 6 plate pairs (see above) are better than
0.50 mas/yr. This can be seen from Fig. 3, which shows the relations
versus N,
versus N and
versus N. So what we can say is that the errors of
the proper motions of stars in the region of NGC 1750 and NGC 1758 obtained
by us are relatively high, because of the good stellar images taken with
the 40 cm double astrograph and the excellent positioning behavior of the
PDS scanning machine.
![]() |
![]() |
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)