![]() |
Figure 5: Simulations for WN binaries. A downward arrow above another symbol indicates a binary. A plus sign above another symbol indicates a "+ abs'' star. The other symbols are explained in Table 3. The longer arrows indicate the displacement imposed to the representative points of some WN stars when their light is mixed with that of an O6V companion star (see text for details) |
![]() |
Figure 6: Simulations for WC binaries. A downward arrow above another symbol indicates a binary. A plus sign above another symbol indicates a "+ abs'' star. An upward arrow below another symbol indicates a weak lined WC star. The other symbols are explained in Table 3. The longer arrows indicate the displacement imposed to the representative points of some WC stars when their light is mixed with that of an O6V companion star. From left to right, the WR stars used for the simulations are WR 103 (WC9), WR 57 (WC7) and Brey 8 (WC5-6) |
The first interesting fact to notice is that the binarity has no effect on the
WN-WC separation as can be seen in Fig. 1. This means that, even when dealing
with spatially unresolved double (or even multiple) objects, photometry alone
still allows not only to detect the WR stars but also to separate them into WN
and WC stars. But, in most cases, much more can still be achieved. As can be
seen in Fig. 2, most of the binaries lie in their proper zone. It is true for
the WN7 stars and it is also true for the WNEw stars with only one exception, WR
43, a WNEw star which is lying in the intermediate strip between the WN7 and the
WN8-9 regions, with l( He II) 0.25. As a matter of fact, this star has
some reasons to be mislocated on our diagram since
Hofman et al. (1995) have
shown that, within a circle of 5'' diameter around the star, diffraction-limited
speckle masking observations allow to count 20 different objects. Among them, 4
are of the WN type, the others probably of type Of. It is interesting to see
that even in such a difficult situation, photometry still allows to classify the
object as a WN star.
The other "mislocated'' objects in Fig. 2 are Brey 40A (the diamond at l( He II)
0.2), a WN3+O6 (Niemela 1991), Brey 21 (the open circle at l( He II)
0.25), a WN5?+B1I (Smith et al. 1996) and WR 97 (the open circle at
l( He II)
0.38), a WN5b + 07 (Smith et al. 1996). Due to their low
intrinsic luminosity (
, van der Hucht 1992), it is
expected that the contamination of a WN3 star by an O6 star
(
) shifts markedly the representative point towards the origin. It
is more surprising for a WN5 star with a luminosity of the order of
(van der Hucht 1992). To quantify this assertion,
we have simulated the contamination of the WR stars of our sample by an O6
object.
As can be seen in Fig. 5, the contamination of a strong lined WN3 star (Brey 1,
located at l( He II) 2.2) by a single O6 star brings its representative
point close to the location of Brey 40A. But the contamination of a strong lined
WN6 star (WR 110, located at l( He II)
2) leads to a markedly shorter
displacement which is not sufficient to bring a representative point from the
strong lined WNE region to the vicinity of the origin of the graph. This could
indicate either that the WR component of Brey 21 and WR 97 is less luminous than
a classical strong lined WNE star or that the WR light is diluted by more than
one companion.
The results of a few other simulations are also shown on the graph. As expected, due to their high luminosities, the representative points of the late WN stars are less affected by the presence of a companion. It is also interesting to notice that the nature of the displacements is such that, basically, a contamination maintains roughly the representative points within their spectral region: a WN8-9 star will always remain in its zone, a WN7 star will roughly do the same, and it is only close to the origin that an early WN star could enter the WN7 + abs region. All the preceding conclusions are not affected if the simulations are made with another spectral type for the companion because the displacement of the representative point comes from the dilution of the WR spectral lines, not from the spectral characteristics of the companions.
Similar simulations have been carried out with WC objects (Fig. 6). Again, the displacement is towards the origin of the axes, i.e. such as to bring the representative points of the binaries in the binaries region, as defined in Figs. 4 and 6. The length of this displacement is a function of the relative luminosities of the WR star and its companion star. It is interesting to notice that the WC9 stars are so well separated from the other WC stars that most of their binaries probably remain in a distinct region of the plot.
Results are encouraging since, thanks to the width of the WR lines, blueshifts
are no source of major problems and redshifts can be tolerated up to several
hundreds of km/s. Of course, the useful part of our plots slightly shrinks as
the redshift increases, i.e. the lines begin to get out of the filters and the
stars slowly travel to the origin of the diagram, but sufficient discriminating
power is left to operate till 500 km/s redshifts. The first property to
suffer from further redshift is the WC9-WN separation. Apart from that, only
slight adaptation of the borders of the different regions could be necessary in
the l( C IV) vs. l( He I) plot at such redshifts.
Tests performed with wider band pass bring no surprise as they prove these to be less sensitive to redshift, but they also reduce discriminating power because the light of the line is more and more diluted by the continuum light as the filters widen.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)