next previous
Up: Determination of the

11. Conclusions

We have been concerned here with the interpretation of data to give stellar temperatures that are as accurate as we can manage, and with an attempt at assessing their relative and absolute accuracies as reliably as possible. No account has been taken of inaccuracies in the original data, for we judge that the largest contributions to errors in the final temperatures originate in the theoretical interpretion of data. The derivation of monochromatic fluxes from observations made using wide wavelength bands is difficult and uncertain, and may introduce unacceptably large errors which depend on uncertain line strengths. Our judgement of the relative accuracies of the final temperatures is reasonably well based and may be regarded as reliable. However, the more difficult task is the assessment of final absolute probable errors. Some contributions to these errors are clear. For example, [Fe/H] values are not available for many stars in the observed list, and even the solar iron abundance is now regarded as uncertain (Blackwell et al. 1995); where no [Fe/H] value is available, we have given an accuracy of 0.9 per cent. A theoretically derived atmosphere is needed, and although these are now more reliable than formerly, some uncertainty about their use remains. An important and extensive investigation of the accuracy of model predictions has been made by van der Bliek et al. (1996), following on the earlier work by Mégessier (1994). In the present paper we suggest that the wholly empirical use of plots of temperature against intrinsic photometric indices, e.g. tex2html_wrap_inline1633 and tex2html_wrap_inline1635, provide useful evidence for relative accuracies, whilst comparisons with measures made by a variety of methods are useful for detecting gross errors.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the ISO Ground Based
Preparatory Programme which has entrusted us with the work reported here. Rapid progrsss would not have been possible without the generosity of Drs. van der Bliek and P.L. Hammersley, who kindly made their observations available in advance of publication. Hipparcos parallaxes were provided by Dr. Perryman, also in advance of publication. Dr. Marie Jourdain de Muizon gave constant and patient help during the investigation and the authors are especially grateful to her. Obtaining infrared monochromatic flux densities would have been more difficult without Dr. Hammersley's advice. The authors have also benefitted from correspondence with Professor G.P. di Benedetto. Comments and suggestions by an anonymous referee have contributed to the present paper.


next previous
Up: Determination of the

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)