next previous
Up: Predicted term energies

2. High-nl term energies

2.1. The Ritz formula

In 1s22s2nl (C II), 1s22snl (C III) and 1s2nl (C IV) configurations, the outer nl electron moves in the resultant field of the nucleus and the inner electrons. In such cases, the deviations between the observed term energies and the exact hydrogen-like values, caused by small core-penetration and polarization effects, are accurately described by the Ritz formalism. In this semi-empirical technique, discussed in detail by Edlén (1964) and more recently by Drake (1994), the term energies are written as


equation215
where tex2html_wrap_inline1312 is the ionization energy, Ry is the reduced mass Rydberg constant (Ry = 109732.3 cm-1 for carbon), tex2html_wrap_inline1320 is the net charge of the core (tex2html_wrap_inline1320 = 2, 3, 4 for C II, C III and C IV respectively) and n* is the effective principal quantum number given by


equation226
tex2html_wrap_inline1326(n,l) is the so-called quantum defect which is strongly dependent on the l-quantum number but only weakly on n and which can be expressed, in the Ritz formalism, by


equation230

2.2. The polarization formula

The energies of high l (non-penetrating) states can also be given to a good approximation by the polarization formula (Edlén 1964):


equation238
The hydrogenic, tex2html_wrap_inline1338, and relativistic, tex2html_wrap_inline1340, terms are given by


equation248


equation253
where tex2html_wrap_inline1342 is the fine structure constant. The polarization term, tex2html_wrap_inline1344, can be written as


equation265
with


equation270
and
eqnarray276
In Eq. (7), the factors A and k can be expressed respectively by
equation282
and
equation288
where tex2html_wrap_inline1342tex2html_wrap_inline1352 is the dipole polarizability of the atomic core in units of a03 and tex2html_wrap_inline1342tex2html_wrap_inline1360 represents the quadrupole polarizability of the core in units of a05.

2.3. Predicted term energies

Using the values 196664.7 and 386241.0 cm-1 (Moore 1970) for the ionization energies of C II and C III respectively and the observed term energies deduced from the compilation of Bashkin & Stoner (1975), new Ritz formulae were derived for the 1s22s2nf, 1s22s2ng (C II) and 1s22sng (C III) series. The Ritz parameters (a, b, c) obtained in the present work as well as the standard deviations between the experimental term energies and those calculated from the Ritz formulae are given in Table 1 (click here). For the 1s22s2nh-ni (C II), 1s22snh-nk (C III) and 1s2nf-nk (C IV) series, the polarization Eq. (4) was used. In the cases of C II and C III, only the dipole contribution was retained (k was set equal to zero) with the dipole polarizabilities tex2html_wrap_inline1342tex2html_wrap_inline1352 = 3.77 and 3.46 a03 respectively. These values were derived from the oscillator strengths published for C III and C IV using the following formula:


equation302
where (Ei-E0/Ry) are the transition energies (in Rydbergs) for lines connecting the ground level in C III and C IV and f0i the corresponding oscillator strengths taken from the Opacity Project (the Opacity Project Team 1995) and corrected with experimental wavelengths by Verner et al. (1994). In the case of C IV, we used the polarization Eq. (4) including both dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities published recently by Tunklev et al. (1997), i.e. tex2html_wrap_inline1414 a03 and tex2html_wrap_inline1342tex2html_wrap_inline1360 = 0.00111 a05, and the ionization energy tex2html_wrap_inline1312 = 520175.9 cm-1 obtained by the same authors.

 

Ion Series a b c standard deviation
C II nf 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 0.028958 -0.221105  0.828474 0.50 cm-1
C II ng 2G 0.006837 -0.040060 -0.242426 0.32 cm-1
C III ng 1,3G 0.026138 -0.672472  6.720485 0.41 cm-1
Table 1: Ritz formulae for the nf, ng series in C II and the ng series in C III. The standard deviations between experimental term energies (Bashkin & Stoner 1975) and those calculated using the Ritz formulae are also given

 

The term energies calculated in our work are compared with available experimental values in Table 2 (click here). Examining this table, it is seen that the discrepancies between both sets of values are very small (the mean difference being 0.8 cm-1) if we except the 6h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 term belonging to C II. For this term, the difference between our value, calculated using the polarization formula, and the measured energy (Bashkin & Stoner 1975) reaches 64.6 cm-1 which probably means that this particular term energy should be redetermined experimentally.

Tables 3 (click here), 4 (click here) and 5 (click here) contain the term energies adopted in the present study for the nf, ng, nh, ni series in C II, for the ng, nh, ni, nk series in C III and for the nf, ng, nh, ni, nk series in C IV respectively for n up to 30. Following the hereabove discussion, the mean uncertainty affecting our predicted values in these series should not exceed 1 cm-1.

 

Ion Term Experiment This work tex2html_wrap_inline1510
C II 4f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 168978.8a 168979.3c -0.5
C II 5f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 178956.4a 178956.5c -0.1
C II 6f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 184376.5a 184376.5c 0.0
C II 7f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 187642.0a 187643.3c -1.3
C II 5g 2G 179073.5a 179073.5c 0.0
C II 6g 2G 184449.7a 184449.7c 0.0
C II 7g 2G 187691.8a 187691.8c 0.0
C II 8g 2G 189794.6a 189795.9c -1.3
C II 6h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 184529.9a 184465.3d 64.6
C II 7h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 187701.0a 187702.2d -1.2
C III 5g 1G 346579.3a 346579.9c -0.6
C III 5g 3G 346579.3a 346579.9c -0.6
C III 6g 1G 358692.2a 358692.6c -0.4
C III 6g 3G 358692.3a 358692.6c -0.3
C III 7g 3G 365998.4a 365998.6c -0.2
C III 6h 3Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 358776.3a 358775.8d 0.5
C IV 4f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 410431.5b 410431.3d 0.2
C IV 5f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 449941.3b 449939.8d 1.5
C IV 6f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 471402.4b 471401.3d 1.1
C IV 7f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 484341.9b 484341.8d 0.1
C IV 8f 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 492740.8b 492740.7d 0.1
C IV 5g 2G 449945.2b 449945.0d 0.2
C IV 6g 2G 471405.8b 471404.5d 1.3
C IV 7g 2G 484345.6b 484343.9d 1.7
C IV 8g 2G 492743.8b 492742.1d 1.7
C IV 6h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 471406.8a 471405.3d 1.5
C IV 7h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 484345.8a 484344.4d 1.4
C IV 8h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 492743.8a 492742.4d 1.4
C IV 9h 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 498501.4a 498500.1d 1.3
C IV 7i 2I 484346.0a 484344.7d 1.3
C IV 8i 2I 492743.9a 492742.6d 1.3
C IV 9i 2I 498501.4a 498500.2d 1.2

a Bashkin & Stoner (1975).

b Tunklev et al. (1997).
c Calculated using the Ritz formula.
d Calculated using the polarization formula.
Table 2: Comparison between the term energies calculated in this work and the available experimental data. All values are given in cm-1

 

 

n nf 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 ng 2G nh 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 ni 2I
4 168978.8a
5 178956.4a 179073.5a
6 184376.5a 184449.7a 184529.9a
7 187642.0a 187691.8a 187701.0a 187705.1c
8 189762.2b 189794.6a 189803.0c 189805.1c
9 191214.0b 191238.2b 191243.3c 191244.8c
10 192251.8b 192269.8b 192273.6c 192274.6c
11 193019.2b 193032.9b 193035.8c 193036.6c
12 193602.6b 193613.3b 193615.5c 193616.1c
13 194056.4b 194064.9b 194066.6c 194067.1c
14 194416.3b 194423.1b 194424.6c 194425.0c
15 194706.6b 194712.2b 194713.3c 194713.7c
16 194944.1b 194948.7b 194949.7c 194949.9c
17 195140.9b 195144.7b 195145.5c 195145.7c
18 195305.7b 195309.0b 195309.6c 195309.8c
19 195445.2b 195448.0b 195448.5c 195448.7c
20 195564.3b 195566.6b 195567.1c 195567.3c
21 195666.7b 195668.8b 195669.2c 195669.3c
22 195755.5b 195757.3b 195757.6c 195757.7c
23 195832.9b 195834.5b 195834.8c 195834.9c
24 195900.9b 195902.2b 195902.5c 195902.6c
25 195960.8b 195962.0b 195962.3c 195962.4c
26 196014.0b 196015.1b 196015.3c 196015.4c
27 196061.3b 196062.3b 196062.5c 196062.6c
28 196103.7b 196104.6b 196104.8c 196104.8c
29 196141.8b 196142.5b 196142.7c 196142.8c
30 196176.1b 196176.8b 196176.9c 196177.0c

a Deduced from the experimental energy levels

(Bashkin & Stoner 1975).
b Calculated from the Ritz formula (see text).
c Calculated from the polarization formula (see text).
Table 3: Adopted term energies (in cm-1) for the nf 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254, ng 2G, nh 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 and ni 2I series of C II

 

 

n ng 1,3G nh 1,3Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 ni 1,3I nk 1,3Ktex2html_wrap_inline1254
5 346579.3a
6 358692.2a 358776.3a
7 365998.4a 366063.8c 366077.5c
8 370743.2b 370794.1c 370803.6c 370807.1c
9 373997.4b 374037.0c 374043.8c 374046.4c
10 376325.4b 376356.4c 376361.5c 376363.5c
11 378047.8b 378072.5c 378076.3c 378077.8c
12 379357.8b 379377.6c 379380.6c 379381.7c
13 380377.1b 380393.2c 380395.5c 380396.5c
14 381185.8b 381198.9c 381200.9c 381201.6c
15 381838.1b 381849.0c 381850.6c 381851.2c
16 382371.8b 382381.0c 382382.3c 382382.8c
17 382814.1b 382821.8c 382822.9c 382823.3c
18 383184.7b 383191.3c 383192.2c 383192.6c
19 383498.3b 383503.9c 383504.7c 383505.0c
20 383766.0b 383770.9c 383771.5c 383771.8c
21 383996.3b 384000.6c 384001.1c 384001.4c
22 384195.9b 384199.6c 384200.1c 384200.3c
23 384370.1b 384373.3c 384373.8c 384373.9c
24 384522.9b 384525.8c 384526.1c 384526.3c
25 384657.7b 384660.3c 384660.6c 384660.7c
26 384777.2b 384779.5c 384779.8c 384779.9c
27 384883.8b 384885.8c 384886.1c 384866.2c
28 384979.0b 384980.9c 384981.1c 384981.2c
29 385064.6b 385066.3c 385066.5c 385066.6c
30 385141.8b 385143.3c 385143.5c 385143.6c

a Deduced from the experimental energy levels

(Bashkin & Stoner 1975).
b Calculated from the Ritz formula (see text).
c Calculated from the polarization formula (see text).
Table 4: Adopted term energies (in cm-1) for the ng 1,3G, nh 1,3Htex2html_wrap_inline1254, ni 1,3I and nk 1,3Ktex2html_wrap_inline1254 series of C III

 

 

n nf 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254 ng 2G nh 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254 ni 2I nk 2Ktex2html_wrap_inline1254
4 410431.5a
5 449941.3a 449945.2a
6 471402.4a 471405.8a 471406.8b
7 484341.9a 484345.6a 484345.8b 484346.0b
8 492740.8a 492743.8a 492743.8b 492743.9b 492742.7c
9 498498.8c 498499.8c 498501.4b 498501.4b 498500.3c
10 502617.6c 502618.3c 502618.5c 502618.6c 502618.6c
11 505665.0c 505665.5c 505665.7c 505665.7c 505665.8c
12 507982.7c 507983.2c 507983.3c 507983.3c 507983.4c
13 509786.5c 509786.8c 509786.9c 509787.0c 509787.0c
14 511217.7c 511218.0c 511218.1c 511218.1c 511218.1c
15 512372.4c 512372.6c 512372.6c 512372.7c 512372.7c
16 513317.3c 513317.5c 513317.6c 513317.6c 513317.6c
17 514100.5c 514100.7c 514100.7c 514100.7c 514100.7c
18 514756.8c 514756.9c 514757.0c 514757.0c 514757.0c
19 515312.2c 515312.4c 515312.4c 515312.4c 515312.4c
20 515786.5c 515786.6c 515786.6c 515786.6c 515786.6c
21 516194.6c 516194.6c 516194.7c 516194.7c 516194.7c
22 516548.3c 516548.3c 516548.4c 516548.4c 516548.4c
23 516856.9c 516856.9c 516856.9c 516857.0c 516857.0c
24 517127.7c 517127.7c 517127.8c 517127.8c 517127.8c
25 517366.7c 517366.7c 517366.7c 517366.7c 517366.7c
26 517578.6c 517578.7c 517578.7c 517578.7c 517578.7c
27 517767.5c 517767.5c 517767.5c 517767.5c 517767.5c
28 517936.4c 517936.4c 517936.5c 517936.5c 517936.5c
29 518088.2c 518088.2c 518088.2c 518088.2c 518088.2c
30 518225.1c 518225.1c 518225.1c 518225.1c 518225.1c

a Deduced from the experimental energy levels

(Tunklev et al. 1997).
b Deduced from the experimental energy levels
(Bashkin & Stoner 1975).
c Calculated from the polarization formula (see text).
Table 5: Adopted term energies (in cm-1) for the nf 2Ftex2html_wrap_inline1254, ng 2G, nh 2Htex2html_wrap_inline1254, ni 2I and nk 2Ktex2html_wrap_inline1254 series of C IV

 


next previous
Up: Predicted term energies

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)