A convenient way to identify the Flint glasses which couple with the alkaline-earth fluoride Crowns is the standard partial dispersion versus Abbe number plot which is displayed in Fig. 1. The most striking result is that SF6 and IRG2 have very similar chromatic characteristics, while SF5 seems an even better match to SrF2 than IRG3. Other interesting pairs are BaF2-SF56A and SrF2-SFL4A.
Here we concentrate on the Flint glasses which couple with BaF2.
Refraction indices and dispersions at room temperatures
are listed in the upper panel of Table 1.
The values of n for SF glasses are computed using
the Sellmeier's parameters of the Schott catalog which interpolate
measurements from 0.37 to 2.33 m, the extrapolation to
2.5
m should not introduce significant errors.
At 25 ![]() | ||||||||||||||
BaF2 | SF6 | SF56A | irg2 | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | n | ![]() | n | ![]() | r(2) | n | ![]() | r(2) | n | ![]() | r(2) | |||
0.9 | 1.46935 | -0.00898 | 1.77935 | -0.04287 | 4.78 | 1.76007 | -0.04111 | 4.58 | 1.86710 | -0.04147 | 4.62 | |||
1.2 | 1.46742 | -0.00475 | 1.77034 | -0.02174 | 4.58 | 1.75138 | -0.02117 | 4.45 | 1.85834 | -0.02126 | 4.47 | |||
1.5 | 1.46622 | -0.00350 | 1.76490 | -0.01567 | 4.47 | 1.74604 | -0.01553 | 4.43 | 1.85301 | -0.01539 | 4.39 | |||
2.0 | 1.46460 | -0.00314 | 1.75771 | -0.01404 | 4.47 | 1.73883 | -0.01421 | 4.52 | 1.84596 | -0.01368 | 4.35 | |||
2.5 | 1.46297 | -0.00342 | 1.75035 | -0.01572 | 4.60 | 1.73134 | -0.01606 | 4.70 | 1.83886 | -0.01499 | 4.39 | |||
At -200 ![]() | ||||||||||||||
BaF2a | SF6b | SF56Ab | irg2b | |||||||||||
![]() ![]() | n | ![]() | n | ![]() | r(2) | n | ![]() | r(2) | n | ![]() | r(2) | |||
0.9 | 1.47222 | -0.00897 | 1.77894 | -0.04227 | 4.71 | 1.75971 | -0.04056 | 4.52 | 1.86666 | -0.04107 | 4.58 | |||
1.2 | 1.47029 | -0.00477 | 1.77005 | -0.02151 | 4.51 | 1.75112 | -0.02096 | 4.40 | 1.85798 | -0.02110 | 4.43 | |||
1.5 | 1.46908 | -0.00352 | 1.76467 | -0.01555 | 4.42 | 1.74584 | -0.01542 | 4.38 | 1.85269 | -0.01531 | 4.35 | |||
2.0 | 1.46746 | -0.00316 | 1.75751 | -0.01399 | 4.42 | 1.73866 | -0.01417 | 4.48 | 1.84567 | -0.01365 | 4.32 | |||
2.5 | 1.46582 | -0.00344 | 1.75017 | -0.01570 | 4.56 | 1.73118 | -0.01604 | 4.66 | 1.83857 | -0.01498 | 4.35 |
Table 1 (lower panel) also includes optical parameters at cryogenic
temperatures. The values for BaF2 are based on the accurate measurements
by Feldman et al. (1979) which tabulate
at 0.46, 0.63, 1.15, 3.39, 10.6
m and many temperatures between +200
and -180
C.
The resulting refraction indices at -200
C can be conveniently fitted
with a two terms Sellmeier's formula which yields
For the Flint glasses we use the Schott formula
and the D0, D1, D2, E0, E1, coefficients
from the Schott catalog which are based on data at
m and
C. The values in Table 1
are therefore extrapolated to wavelengths and temperatures for which no
measurement exists. However, this should not necessarily
introduce large errors because Eq. (2) is based on a physical representation
of the glass properties (i.e. the Sellmeier's formula) and the only
important uncertainty could be that Eq. (2) does not include the long
wavelength resonance which for SF glasses lies at
11
m.
Figure 2:
Solid lines: predicted variation of refractive index between room
and cryogenic temperatures
(= n(
C)-n(
C)).
The curves are based on the T-dependent,
Sellmeier equation (Eq. 2) whose parameters are taken
from the Schott catalog (cf. Sect. 2). The dashed lines
is the value for IRG2 estimated by Doyon et al. (1995)
and also confirmed
within
10-4
by direct measurements (van Dijsseldonk 1995)
The predicted total variation of refraction index with wavelength is
plotted in Fig. 2 where we also include IRG2, a glass for which other
estimates exist in the literature (see the caption of Fig. 2 (click here)).
The main result is that is small for glasses, the
variation of dispersion is also very low and in practice negligible.
This is confirmed by our detailed designs (Sect. 3) where we find
that the same systems also give excellent images if
the SF glasses have
at all wavelengths, the only modification required is to refocus the
array by a few
10
m.
In short,
the information presently available on SF glasses is probably enough for
their use in cryogenic lens systems.
However, new measurements of refraction indices
at 70 K and IR wavelengths would be useful, and
could be essential for the design of multi-objective systems which do not
foresee the possibility of refocusing the array.