Table 3 (click here) gives the postfit statistics for the observed-minus-computed residuals
for the Earthbased observations grouped by data set. For each set the table
indicates the type of observations and the number used versus the total number
available. The statistics include the sample mean (
) of the residuals,
the standard deviation (
) about the mean, and the root-mean-square
(rms). The Arequipa, the 1904 Yerkes, and the USNO observations were not fit;
however, statistics for them are included. To arrive at the statistics for
the unused observations, we deleted all residuals greater than 30'' and
applied a 3
rejection criterion to the remainder.
| Set | Year | Observer/Source | Type | No. |
| rms | wrms | No. |
| rms | wrms | ||
| 1 | 1898 | Pickering | P0 | 7/7 | -0 | 4 | 3 | 7/7 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 2 | 1899 | Pickering | P0 | 0/3 | 0/3 | ||||||||
| 3 | 1900 | Pickering | P0 | 20/26 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 20/26 | 3 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 4 | 1902 | Pickering | P0 | 2/6 | -11 | 19 | 18 | 2/6 | -3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 5 | 1904 | Pickering | P2 | 26/28 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 26/28 | -3 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 6 | 1904 | Barnard | V0 | 1/2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1/2 | -3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 7 | 1904 | Perrine | P0 | 5/6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.01 | 5/6 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.95 |
| 8 | 1905 | Pickering | P2 | 11/17 | -2 | 12 | 11 | 11/17 | -4 | 14 | 14 | ||
| 9 | 1905 | Albrecht | P0 | 11/11 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.01 | 11/11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.99 |
| 10 | 1906 | Perrine | P0 | 8/8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.96 | 8/8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.94 |
| 11 | 1906 | Pickering | P2 | 6/6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6/6 | -5 | 9 | 10 | ||
| 12 | 1906 | Pickering | P2 | 9/9 | -1 | 8 | 7 | 9/9 | -3 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 13 | 1906 | Barnard | V0 | 11/12 | -2 | 4 | 4 | 1.01 | 12/12 | -0 | 1 | 1 | 0.99 |
| 14 | 1907 | Christie | P0 | 16/16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.01 | 16/16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 |
| 15 | 1908 | Perrine | P0 | 2/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.99 | 2/2 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 1.01 |
| 16 | 1908 | Christie | P0 | 22/23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.99 | 22/23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.01 |
| 17 | 1909 | Christie | P0 | 12/12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.02 | 12/12 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.99 |
| 18 | 1910 | Christie | P0 | 7/7 | -0 | 1 | 1 | 0.99 | 7/7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| 19 | 1912 | Barnard | V0 | 12/12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.02 | 7/7 | -0 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 20 | 1913 | Barnard | V0 | 5/5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.93 | 3/3 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.01 |
| 21 | 1922 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 4/5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.99 | 4/5 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 0.98 |
| 22 | 1940 | Nicholson | P0 | 1/1 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.49 | 1/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
| 23 | 1942 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 7/8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.97 | 7/8 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.67 |
| 24 | 1952 | Bobone | P0 | 7/7 | -0 | 1 | 0 | 1.00 | 7/7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.61 |
| 25 | 1955 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 8/11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.96 | 8/11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.98 |
| 26 | 1955 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 3/3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.97 | 3/3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.02 |
| 27 | 1957 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 8/8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.97 | 8/8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.98 |
| 28 | 1960 | Roemer | P0 | 2/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.01 | 2/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.84 |
| 29 | 1968 | Chernykh | P0 | 2/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.99 | 2/2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0.97 |
| 30 | 1969 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 1/3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.98 | 1/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.77 |
| 31 | 1969 | VanBiesbroeck | P0 | 1/1 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 | 1/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| 32 | 1975 | Mulholland | P1 | 4/5 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.99 | 4/5 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.45 |
| P0 | 2/3 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.98 | 2/3 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.42 | |||
| 33 | 1981 | Bowell | P1 | 8/10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.99 | 8/10 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.98 |
| P0 | 2/2 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 2/2 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0.99 | |||
| 34 | 1981 | Debehogne | P1 | 20/21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.94 | 20/21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.95 |
| 35 | 1982 | Bowell | P1 | 2/2 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 2/2 | -0 | 1 | 1 | 1.00 |
| 36 | 1982 | Debehogne | P1 | 18/21 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 18/21 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.98 |
| 37 | 1992 | Rohde | P0 | 22/22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 22/22 | -0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 38 | 1992 | Whipple | P0 | 12/12 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.52 | 12/12 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.97 |
| 39 | 1993 | Rohde | P0 | 9/9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9/9 | -1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 40 | 1994 | Whipple | P0 | 2/2 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 1.07 | 2/2 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 0.93 |
| 41 | 1996 | Whipple | C0 | 21/21 | -0 | 0 | 0 | 1.06 | 21/21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.75 |
|
|
The mean for each set gives an indication of systematic errors. For example, a large mean in the right ascension residuals could be attributed to an equinox offset. The standard deviation measures the scatter of the residuals about the mean and characterizes the noise level of the observations, and the root-mean-square represents the overall quality of the fit. Also included is the weighted root-mean-square (wrms), i.e., the rms of the residuals multiplied by their weights. The wrms measures the quality of the fit relative to the assumed accuracy of the observations. The weights can be recovered from the ratio of the wrms to the rms.
Overall, the orbit fits the Earthbased observations at the 1
19 level.
The rms for the "old'' (pre-1940) sets is 1
48 and for the "modern''
(post-1940) sets is 0
78. Among the sets used, the poorest fit is to
Barnard's 1906 micrometer measures, and the best fits are to Whipple's 1992
photographic data, Whipple's 1996 CCD data, and Mulholland's 1975 relative
photographic data. Also, Nicholson's isolated 1940 observation has a
surprisingly small residual.
Figure 1 (click here)
displays the right ascension residuals for the observations that were
fit, and Fig. 2 (click here)
displays the declination residuals. The figures give an
indication of the time distribution of the observations and the overall
quality of the fit. Considerable scatter is evident as well as some suggestion
of systematic errors.

Figure 1: Right ascension residuals

Figure 2: Declination residuals
The residuals for the Voyager imaging data range in magnitude from 7 to 235 km; the rms for all eight is 104 km.
The rms for residuals of the Saturn observations from Greenwich are 0
42
and 0
28 in right ascension and declination, respectively. Table 4 (click here) gives
the biases found for each observation set.
| Year | Rt. Asc. | Dec. |
| 1907 | 2 | 0 |
| 1908 | 1 | 0 |
| 1909 | 1 | -0 |
| 1910 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
The epoch state vector obtained from the fit appears in Table 5 (click here), and the Saturnian system dynamical constants needed for the integration appear in Table 6 (click here). Two state vectors are provided: the first is a from a fit which used the complete dynamical model in post-1966 integration; the second is from a fit which used the simplified model. The simplified model was used in the pre-1966 integration in both cases. The root-mean-square of the differences between the two models over the time period 1900 to 2013 are 7.4 km in the radial direction, 50.5 km in the in-orbit direction, and 17.2 km in the out-of-plane direction.
As an aid to those wishing to reproduce the integration, Table 7 (click here) contains the state vector for the simplified model at the end of the integration.
| Component | Position (km) | Velocity (km/s) |
| complete model | ||
| x | -12049661.9430915500 | -0.5851428400610138 |
| y | -2354538.7543550990 | 1.5137695265625980 |
| z | 298437.1979645121 | 0.7872087168834739 |
| simplified model | ||
| x | -12049676.2666544100 | -0.5851329248090125 |
| y | -2354463.3515782810 | 1.5137727228222640 |
| z | 298451.8787930112 | 0.7872099536417393 |
|
| ||
| Name | Value | Units |
| Saturn system GM | 37940629.764 | km3/s2 |
| Mimas GM | 2.500 | km3/s2 |
| Enceladus GM | 4.900 | km3/s2 |
| Tethys GM | 41.808 | km3/s2 |
| Dione GM | 73.156 | km3/s2 |
| Rhea GM | 154.000 | km3/s2 |
| Titan GM | 8978.200 | km3/s2 |
| Iapetus GM | 106.000 | km3/s2 |
| Saturn radius | 60330.0 | km |
| Saturn J2 | 162.98 | |
|
Saturn J | 213.74 | |
| Saturn J4 | -9.15 | |
| Saturn J6 | 1.03 | |
| Saturn pole right ascension | 40.58 | deg |
| Saturn pole declination | 83.54 | deg |
|
|
| Component | Position (km) | Velocity (km/s) |
| x | -10039870.733667480 | -1.2513317541446060 |
| y | -6590801.243860413 | 1.1142229491687150 |
| z | -2664829.368414232 | 0.6536617058933396 |
|
|
Because an integrated orbit in terms of cartesian coordinates is difficult to
interpret geometrically, an alternative representation in the form of mean
orbital elements is often useful. Table 8 (click here) provides mean elements derived by
fitting a precessing ellipse model to the integration over the period 1900 to
2013. The reference plane is the Phoebe Laplacian plane, the plane on which
the orbit precesses almost uniformly. The orientation angles
for the Laplacian plane pole are with respect to the Earth mean equator and
equinox of J2000 system; the tilt of the plane off the Saturn equator is
26
183. The epoch mean longitude
, longitude of periapsis
, and longitude of the ascending node
, are measured from the
ascending node of the Laplacian plane on the Earth mean equator of J2000.
The elements may be used as replacements for those provided by Rohde &
Sinclair (1992) for computing an approximate orbit. We should comment
that the
latter element set is referred to the ecliptic and equinox of 1950.0, hence
the angular elements cannot be compared directly with ours. The
root-mean-square of the differences between the integrated and the approximate
orbits over the 1900 to 2013 period are 127236 km in the radial direction,
244253 km in the in-orbit direction, and 15438 km in the out-of-plane
direction. These differences give an indication of the magnitude of the
periodic perturbations (mostly due to the Sun) affecting the
orbit.
| Element | Value | Units |
| semi-major axis | 12944346 | km |
| eccentricity | 0.16435 | |
| inclination | 174.751 | deg |
|
| 390.742 | deg |
|
| 203.958 | deg |
|
| 233.037 | deg |
| orbital period | 548.2122790 | days |
|
| 1.19141 | deg/yr |
|
| 0.45631 | deg/yr |
| Laplacian plane pole | 275.631 | deg |
| right ascension | ||
| Laplacian plane pole | 68.031 | deg |
| declination | ||
|
|