next previous
Up: The electron impact

2. Results and discussion

Summaries of the semiclassical perturbation formalism (Sahal-Bréchot 1969a,b) and of the modified semiempirical formalism (Dimitrijevic & Konjevic 1980) are given in Dimitrijevic & Sahal-Bréchot (1995) and Popovic & Dimitrijevic (1996b) and will not be repeated here. The atomic energy levels needed for calculations were taken from Bashkin & Stoner (1987) for Mn II, Moore (1971) for Mn III, Ryabtsev & Wyart (1987) and Isberg & Litzén (1986) for Ga III, Sugar & Musgrove (1993) for Ge III, and in Ryabtsev & Wyart (1987) and Sugar & Musgrove (1993) for Ge IV. Oscillator strengths have been calculated by using the method of Bates tex2html_wrap_inline1041 Damgaard (1949) and the tables of Oertel tex2html_wrap_inline1041 Shomo (1968). For higher levels, the method described by Van Regemorter et al. (1979) has been used.

Results obtained within the modified semiempirical approach - MSE (Dimitrijevic & Konjevic 1980) for electron - impact line widths and shifts for 16 Mn II, 3 Mn III, 10 Ga III, 8 Ge III and 14 Ge IV multiplets as a function of temperature are presented in Tables 1 - 3 (accessibles only in electronic form). The calculations were performed for the perturber density of tex2html_wrap_inline1047. Within the used approach, results for electron-impact broadening parameters are linear with electron density. For three lines of Ge IV it is possible to calculate Stark broadening parameters within the semiclassical perturbation approach (Sahal-Bréchot 1969a,b). For electron-, proton-, and He III-impact line widths and shifts for 3 Ge IV multiplets for the perturber densities of tex2html_wrap_inline1053 and temperatures tex2html_wrap_inline1055, are shown in Table 4 (accessible only in electronic form). For electron densities lower than tabulated, a linear interpolation with density is sufficient. We also specify a parameter C (Dimitrijevic & Sahal-Bréchot 1984), which gives an estimate for the maximum perturber density for which the line may be treated as isolated when it is divided by the corresponding full width at half maximum. For each value given in Table 1, the collision volume (V) multiplied by the perturber density (N) is much less than one and the impact approximation is valid (Sahal-Bréchot 1969a,b). Values for NV > 0.5 are not given and values for 0.1 < NV tex2html_wrap_inline1067 are denoted by an asterisk. For higher densities, when the impact approximation is not valid, the ion broadening contribution may be estimated by using quasistatic approach (Sahal-Bréchot 1991 or Griem 1974). In the region between where neither of these two approximations is valid, a unified type theory should be used. For example in Barnard et al. (1974), simple analytical formulas for such a case are given. The accuracy of the results decreases when broadening by ion interactions becomes important. As an illustration, in Fig. 1 (click here). we have compared Stark widths calculated by using the semiclassical, MSE, simplified MSE and Griem's semiempirical appraoch.

  figure296
Figure 1: Stark full widths for tex2html_wrap_inline1021 transition of Ge IV calculated by using different approximations, as functions of temperature. The electron density is tex2html_wrap_inline1047

In the case of these ions there is not measured Stark broadening parameters. For Mn II tex2html_wrap_inline1001 transition Dimitrijevic (1982) performed calculations by using the MSE, Griem's semiempirical approach - SE (Griem 1968) and semiclassical approach of Griem (see Jones et al. 1971; Griem 1974). Since these data complete MSE results for Mn II they are shown here in Table 5 (click here), together with semiempirical and semiclassical results. The MSE results are in good agreement with more sophisticated semiclassical calculations. For Ga III tex2html_wrap_inline1021 multiplet calculations by using the MSE and the SE approach as well as calculations by using approximate semiclassical method (Griem 1974) and the modification of this method (Dimitrijevic & Konjevic 1980) were performed by Dimitrijevic & Artru (1986). For this multiplet calculations within the SE approach are given in Puric et al. (1978) as well. Results according to the approximate semiclassical method are slightly larger than MSE results and results obtained by the modification of approximate semiclassical method which are in good agreement.

Also, for Mn II tex2html_wrap_inline1077 multiplet, width and shift estimated on the basis of Stark broadening parameters dependence on ionized potential from the lower level of the corresponding transition exist as well (Lakicevic 1983). For an electron density of tex2html_wrap_inline1047 and an electron temperature of 20000 K, Lakicevic obtains tex2html_wrap_inline1081 = 0.008 nm and tex2html_wrap_inline1083 = 0.0036 nm, while our results are tex2html_wrap_inline1003 = 0.0041 nm and tex2html_wrap_inline1087 = 0.00093 nm.

We hope that Stark broadening data presented here will be of interest for space spectroscopy and for chemically peculiar star research as well as for laboratory plasma spectroscopy. Experimental data for considered ion lines will be of interest for the discussion and developement of Stark broadening theory for heavier emitters with more complex spectra.

Acknowledgements

This work is a part of the project "Astrometrical, Astrodynamical and Astrophysical Investigations", supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of Serbia.


next previous
Up: The electron impact

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)