next previous
Up: A statistical study

3. The sources lists and general properties

Table 1 (click here) lists the 83 target galaxies, of which 73 belong to the complete sample. Of the other ten objects in brackets, four of them have slightly lower infrared luminosities than 1011.5 tex2html_wrap_inline1061 and six are fainter than our magnitude limit tex2html_wrap_inline1063. This table presents the infrared luminosities in unit of tex2html_wrap_inline1061, magnitudes and redshifts. All of these data were derived from the 2 Jy catalog, except that in the case of IR 09517+6954 (M 82). We cannot use redshift as a distance indicator on account of the proximity. For this reason, we adopted the distance value given by Tully (1988). These objects flagged with asterisks in Col. 1 are the sources which are also included in the IRAS Bright Galaxy Sample tex2html_wrap_inline1067 of Kim et al. (1995). A detailed comparison between these two samples will be made in Paper II.

The spatial distribution of the 73 sample galaxies on the sky is shown in Fig. 1 (click here). The dotted curve is the celestial equator. The scarcity of objects near galactic declination tex2html_wrap_inline1069 is due to the matching Zwicky catalog (1961-1968) which misses galaxies at low latitude.

  figure265
Figure 1: The distribution of very luminous IRAS galaxies in the sky shown in equal area projection using Galactic coordinates

  figure270
Figure 2: Distribution of redshifts. The solid boxes represent our complete samples while the dotted boxes include the other ten galaxies

  figure275
Figure 3: Distribution of infrared luminosities. The solid and dotted boxes represent the same galaxies as they do in Fig. 2 (click here)

Figure 2 (click here) shows the sample distribution as a function of redshift. The solid boxes represent the complete sample, while the dotted boxes include the other ten sources. It is clear that the redshifts concentrate in the range 0.02 to 0.04. The median value is 0.0324 (corresponding to a recession velocity tex2html_wrap_inline1071) which is larger than the value tex2html_wrap_inline1073 obtained by Kim et al. (1995) for their sample.

The infrared luminosity distribution is shown in Fig. 3 (click here). The solid and dotted boxes correspond to the same samples as in Fig. 2 (click here). The counts decrease rapidly as the infrared luminosity increases. Most of the galaxies have infrared luminosities tex2html_wrap_inline1075) between 11.5 and 12.0.

 

IRAS a tex2html_wrap_inline1079 mag z IRAS tex2html_wrap_inline1079 mag z
(1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)
00189+3748 11.572 15.30 0.0364 13136+6223* 11.937 15.10 0.0311
00267+3016 11.966 14.80 0.0504 13183+3423* 11.863 14.80 0.0230
00509+1225 11.772 14.00 0.0604 13299+1121 11.516 14.50 0.0317
01173+1405* 11.868 14.90 0.0312 13362+4831* 11.706 14.10 0.0275
01324+2138 11.629 15.30 0.0472 13373+0105* 11.701 13.80 0.0225
01484+2220* 11.851 13.70 0.0324 13428+5608* 12.392 15.00 0.0373
01572+0009 12.665 15.20 0.1630 13458+1540 11.821 15.00 0.0570
02071+3857 11.546 13.00 0.0179 13496+0221 11.752 15.00 0.0328
02203+3158 11.837 14.90 0.0338 13536+1836 11.611 14.80 0.0497
02222+2159 11.652 14.90 0.0338 14151+2705 11.565 15.10 0.0365
02248+2621 11.519 14.60 0.0327 14178+4927* 11.541 15.40 0.0256
02435+1253* 11.501 15.20 0.0216 14547+2448* 11.897 14.60 0.0339
02512+1446* 11.780 14.60 0.0312 14568+4504 11.501 14.60 0.0357
03117+4151 11.562 14.00 0.0235 15107+0724* 11.525 15.50 0.0131
(05084+7936) 12.170 15.80 0.0543 15163+4255* 12.072 14.90 0.0402
(05414+5840) 11.505 - 0.0148 15327+2340* 12.464 14.40 0.0182
(06538+4628) 11.490 13.70 0.0214 15425+4114 11.515 14.20 0.0317
(07062+2041) 11.559 - 0.0174 15426+4116 11.546 13.90 0.0319
07063+2043 11.570 12.60 0.0173 16104+5235* 11.687 14.50 0.0294
(07256+3355*) 11.467 14.70 0.0135 16180+3753 11.592 14.30 0.0307
08354+2555* 11.781 14.40 0.0184 16284+0411* 11.582 14.90 0.0246
08507+3520 11.811 15.00 0.0559 16504+0228* 12.028 14.70 0.0243
(09047+1838) 11.490 14.80 0.0291 16577+5900* 11.582 14.20 0.0187
09126+4432* 11.913 14.90 0.0393 16589+0521 11.637 15.50 0.0502
09168+3308 11.725 15.30 0.0499 17366+8646 11.544 14.60 0.0264
09320+6134* 12.220 15.50 0.0392 17392+3845 11.554 15.00 0.0410
09333+4841* 11.523 15.00 0.0259 17501+6825 11.829 15.20 0.0512
(09517+6954) 10.833 9.57 0.0009 18525+5518 11.683 15.50 0.0484
10203+5235 11.620 15.00 0.0322 18595+5048 11.501 15.10 0.0271
(10311+3507) 12.096 - 0.0710 19120+7320 11.624 15.10 0.0250
(10565+2448*) 12.245 16.00 0.0431 20550+1656* 12.074 15.20 0.0364
11231+1456* 11.809 15.40 0.0341 22388+3359* 11.531 15.00 0.0214
11254+1126 11.800 14.80 0.0410 22501+2427 11.723 15.30 0.0421
11257+5850 12.040 11.80 0.0104 23007+0836* 11.734 13.06 0.0162
11543+0124 11.716 15.20 0.0397 23024+1916* 11.573 15.20 0.0248
(12112+0305) 12.531 - 0.0724 23135+2516* 11.730 15.00 0.0273
12120+6838 12.029 15.40 0.0608 23254+0830* 11.568 13.60 0.0290
12251+4026 11.660 15.00 0.0371 23488+1949* 11.528 13.39 0.0142
12265+0219 12.663 13.07 0.1583 23488+2018* 11.609 14.90 0.0179
12323+1549 11.766 15.20 0.0461 23532+2513 11.795 15.00 0.0571
12540+5708* 12.636 14.10 0.0418 23594+3622 11.586 15.40 0.0321
12592+0436 11.787 15.50 0.0371
a The sources marked * in Col. (1) were also observed by Kim et al. (1995).
Table 1: VLIRGs from IRAS 2 Jy catalog

 


next previous
Up: A statistical study

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)