For an interval (-1, 1) covered by the observations, Ss=2/(s+1) for
even s and 0 else. For constant weights p(z)=1 (case "up") the
matrices are the following:

For the coefficients
one may obtain

For simple running mean ("um") h[C0,z]=1/2, V=1/2, and other
coefficients
by definition. One may note that coefficients
C1 and C2 for "unweighted" polynomial fits are equal to
and
(in dimensionless argument units z). However, with
changing interval, the observational points are added to and removed
from the set, thus such an approximation is valid only for a fixed set
of data (tk,xk). For continuous functions, one may not choose an
interval of t0 with a fixed set, and derivatives are computed using
Eq. (31).
For the weights p(z)=(1-z2)2,

For "weighted mean" ("wm"):
![]()
For "weighted parabolae" ("wp"):

To determine h[C01,z] and h[C02,z], one would use Eqs. (38, 39).
However, for continuous polynomial fits and all weight functions
satisfying the condition
the matrices
are equal to zero, as well as
For "wp",
![]()
One may note that more complicated character of the evaluation of the
derivatives as compared with coefficients C1 and C2 leads to much
larger values of corresponding parameter V, e.g.
V[C01]/V[C10]=525/140.
![]()
Figure 3: Projective functions h[C0,z] for 4 model "symmetric"
polynomial fits
First derivative of the smoothing function in the case of continuous
signal x(t) is equal to

For "symmetric" fits
one may obtain

One may note that derivatives for the "unweighted" fits are strongly
dependent on particular values of the signal at the borders, making
impossible the form (50) without using the Dirac's
functions. In a case
one may introduce corresponding
functions
and to obtain V=15/7 for "wm" and V=525/22
for "wp".
Expressions for "asymmetric" fits are much more complicated. For an
extreme case
for "unweighted"
fits, and
. Corresponding
functions h are equal to 0, if z<0 and z>1. From 0 to 1 they are
the following:
