next previous
Up: Search for young

5. Results

Our aim is to search for low-mass PMS stars among the RASS source counterparts observed in this work, by studying their LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610 doublet. The presence of a strong LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610 absorption is the most evident indicator of the PMS nature. Typical equivalent widths range from 0.7 Å, observed in cTTS (Magazzù et al. 1992) to 0.1 Å, observed in wTTS (Martín et al. 1994), while equivalent widths lower than about 0.3 Å have been measured in Pleiades objects (Soderblom et al.\ 1993; García López et al. 1994).

  figure523
Figure 3: Equivalent widths of the LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610 doublet vs. spectral type for the stars in our sample. The continuous line has been adapted from Fig. 2 (click here)d in Soderblom et al. (1993) and represents the upper envelope of Li equivalent width for Pleiades stars. Squares (circles) indicate two (three) points in the same position. Crosses are doubtful points (see text)

 

designation

tex2html_wrap_inline1992 (opt.) tex2html_wrap_inline1994 (opt.) rel. pos. V remarks

RXJ 0210.4-1308SW

2 10 26 -13 07 56 2tex2html_wrap_inline2612 southwest of NE 12.5
RXJ 0219.4-1321A 2 20 29 -13 20 25 60tex2html_wrap_inline2612 northeast of B 13
RXJ 0219.4-1321C 2 19 25 -13 21 47 40tex2html_wrap_inline2612 south of B 15.5
RXJ 0223.3-1615SW 2 23 25 -16 14 31 10tex2html_wrap_inline2612 southwest of NE 13.5
RXJ 0254.8-0709NW 2 54 53 -07 09 20 6tex2html_wrap_inline2612 northwest of SE 15.5
RXJ 0255.8-0750N 2 55 52 -07 50 29 10tex2html_wrap_inline2612 north of S 15.5
RXJ 0309.1+0324S 3 09 10 03 23 42 2tex2html_wrap_inline2612 south of N 11
RXJ 0312.8-0414SE 3 12 51 -04 14 19 14tex2html_wrap_inline2612 southeast of NW 10.5
RXJ 0330.7+0306S 3 30 43 03 05 18 30tex2html_wrap_inline2612 south of N 15
RXJ 0347.2+0933NE 3 47 17 09 33 08 40tex2html_wrap_inline2612 northeast of SW 12
RXJ 0349.4+1255S 3 49 28 12 54 28 14tex2html_wrap_inline2612 south of N 10 BD+12 511B
RXJ 0351.4+0953E 3 51 28 09 53 34 25tex2html_wrap_inline2612 east of W 13.7
RXJ 0400.1+0818S 4 00 09 08 18 15 4tex2html_wrap_inline2612 south of N 10 BD+07 582
RXJ 0407.2+0113S 4 07 16 01 13 12 2tex2html_wrap_inline2612 south of N 12
RXJ 0426.4+0957E 4 27 30 09 57 00 45tex2html_wrap_inline2612 east of W 11.5 also in GSC
RXJ 0525.7+1205NW 5 25 44 12 04 30 45tex2html_wrap_inline2612 northwest of SE 14.5

Table 3: Other optical counterparts observed. Listed are optical counterparts other than those in Table 2 (click here), but which have also been observed by us. We list designation (as in Table 1 (click here), but with indications regarding the particular counterpart listed here), approximate optical position (for J2000.0), a remark regarding its position relative to the counterpart listed in Table 2 (click here), approximate V magnitude, and remarks. The source for optical positions, V magnitudes, and remarks are either GSC, Simbad, or visual inspection of plates

 

In Fig. 3 (click here) we show, for our objects in which Li has been detected, the LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610 equivalent width vs. the spectral type. We plot also the upper envelope of LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610 equivalent widths for stars in the Pleiades (adapted from Fig. 2 (click here)d in Soderblom et al. 1993).

In this paper we classify as low-mass PMS stars those objects, later than F7, satisfying the following criterion:

The LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610 equivalent width must be greater than in Pleiades objects of the same spectral type.
In other words, a star is an PMS if it can be located above the continuous line in Fig. 3 (click here). Stars in which lithium has been detected, but below the Pleiades upper envelope, will be classified as possible PMS stars ("PMS?'' in Table 4 (click here)). Objects with no lithium will be classified as dKe or dMe stars, depending on their spectral type, if their tex2html_wrap_inline1642 is in emission or strongly filled in. The remaining objects will be classified as "non-PMS''. We are aware that this classification is somewhat arbitrary, for example among the non-PMS we could find some post-TTS, which in some cases show the Li resonance doublet weaker than 0.1 Å (Martín et al. 1992). However, we believe this is a conservative classification, which makes us quite confident that objects classified as "PMS'' are really PMS stars. In order to get accurate ages of our objects, we are planning further observations, aimed to locate our PMS candidates in the tex2html_wrap_inline2694 diagram and measure their lithium abundance.

Note that we do not impose any restriction on tex2html_wrap_inline1642 for PMS stars. In fact, TTS show a wide range of tex2html_wrap_inline1642 equivalent widths, from strong emission in cTTS to practically no emission in post-TTS. However, from Table 4 (click here) we can see that most of the objects classified as PMS or PMS? show weak tex2html_wrap_inline1642 emission or tex2html_wrap_inline1642 absorption shallower than in main sequence objects, as expected for wTTS.

Although the objects RXJ 0255.8-0750N, RXJ 0333.0 +0354, and RXJ 0422.9+0141 in Fig. 3 (click here) are located above the Pleiades upper envelope, in this paper we classify them as PMS? For the first two objects this is due to the quite high level of noise, which makes doubtful the detection of the lithium line. For RXJ 0422.9+0141 we note that this object is a spectroscopic binary (see remark 7 in Table 4 (click here)) and the determination of the spectral type of its components is rather uncertain.

  figure556
Figure 4: Some finding charts (5tex2html_wrap2762 tex2html_wrap_inline2714 5tex2html_wrap2762). North is up, East on the left. The other PMS and PMS? stars can be easily identified (see text)

In total, there are 115 RASS sources selected for optical follow-up observations. As some RASS sources have several potential optical counterparts, we have performed spectroscopy for a total of 131 stars, all listed in Table 4 (click here). In Fig. 4 (click here) we show the finding charts for some object whose identification may be difficult; all the other new PMS can be easily identified, as they are GSC stars with no bright stars in the vicinity. In case of need, the charts for any object observed here are available on request.

There are 30 stars in our sample which can be classified as PMS stars, according to our criterion. These objects are counterparts to 28 RASS sources, i.e. for two RASS sources we have found two new PMS stars each (with separations of tex2html_wrap_inline2718 and tex2html_wrap_inline2720). In addition, there are 19 RASS counterparts classified as PMS? as well as 17 and 5 RASS counterparts classified as dKe and dMe, respectively. In several spectra, we clearly see double lines indicative of close binaries (identified as spectroscopic binaries - "SB'' - in Table 4 (click here)). Namely, we find seven (one) SB among the stars classified as dKe (dMe) stars, three among the PMS? stars, and four among the non-PMS stars.

The spectra of all 30 stars classified in Table 4 (click here) as new PMS stars are shown in Fig. 5 (click here). These and all the other spectra are available from the authors. In some cases one can see quite broad lines indicative of either close binaries and/or fast rotation. As some relatively fast rotators are expected to be present among TTS, we do not classify such PMS stars as SB.

As can be seen from Table 4 (click here), three of the 15 stars classified as wTTS in Neuhäuser et al. (1995c) may not be real young PMS stars according to our stricter criterion; here they are classified as dKe stars. Seven other stars classified as wTTS by Neuhäuser et al. are now classified as PMS? stars, while the other five wTTS are confirmed to be PMS stars also in this paper.

We note that one of the stars studied here (HD 23793 B) is the late-type secondary in the so-called Lindroos sample (Lindroos 1986), a set of double stars with the primary being an early-type star and the secondary being late-type. It has been suggested that many of the secondaries in this sample may be post-TTS (Lindroos 1986). However, both Pallavicini et al. (1992) and Martín et al.\ (1992) consistently found that only about one third of them may be genuine post-TTS. As far as HD 23793 B is concerned (spectral type F5), both Pallavicini et al. (1992) and ourselves find tex2html_wrap_inline1642 absorption and very weak LiItex2html_wrap_inline1610. Pallavicini et al. (1992) did not detect Ca H and K emission and classified this Lindroos pair as an optical system. According to our criterion, we classify this star as non-PMS as well.


next previous
Up: Search for young

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr