next previous
Up: A catalogue of

4. Some remarks on the parameters listed in the Catalogue

The authors of this Edition decided to give to the Catalogue a more spectroscopic aspect than in the previous versions, keeping only as photometric parameters, the visual magnitude V and the colour index B-V. As a great work has been done by Pr. Hauck and Drs. Mermilliod to bring the GCPD up to date, it would have been superfluous to repeat the same information in this spectroscopic Catalogue. Then, why has a Catalogue of atmospheric parameters of stars been called a ``Catalogue of [Fe/H] determinations"? Because the understanding of the chemical composition of stars, interstellar matter, and galaxies has become one of the central issues of modern astronomy. Therefore we wanted to emphasize the importance of the abundance parameter [Fe/H].

As was already mentionned in Sect. 2, the atmospheric parameters listed in the Catalogue are deduced from models generally computed with the assumption of LTE. But not all the time. The reader is urged to consult the individual references for more details on the techniques used in each analysis.

The colour index B-V is a convenient photometric parameter because it has been determined for a very large number of stars (in File 1, 98% of the stars have a colour index B-V). This index is commonly used as a temperature indicator in galactic studies in which a large number of very faint stars are considered. The plot in Fig. 1 (click here) shows the distribution of the field stars of the Catalogue (File 1) in the plane (B-V, tex2html_wrap_inline961) for stars ranging between tex2html_wrap_inline963 and tex2html_wrap_inline965. There is a clear trend of tex2html_wrap_inline967 with respect to B-V, but the dispersion about the correlation is very high. The relation between tex2html_wrap_inline971 and B-V is particularly uncertain around B-V=0.5 where the corresponding tex2html_wrap_inline977 spans more than tex2html_wrap_inline979. The dispersion in this relationship is undoubtedly heavily influenced by the sensitivity of B-V to the metallicity of the star, showing the limitation of B-V as a temperature indicator.

  figure275
Figure 1: tex2html_wrap_inline985 plotted against B-V colour for field stars (File 1) of the Catalogue

In most cases, the Sun is used as the reference star in the analyses. However, for early type stars, peculiar Ap and Am stars, yellow giants etc... other well analysed stars like tex2html_wrap_inline989 Vir, tex2html_wrap_inline991 Boo or o Peg, are also used as reference. In some cases, the authors have not observed their reference stars with the same observational and optical equipment as their program stars. Also they have not always analysed their program and reference stars using the same model atmospheres and the same physical and atomic parameters. As a result, even for most recent analyses, the abundance determinations from different authors may show significant disagreement in spite of the excellent quality of the observations. Instead of taking the mean of the abundances listed for a star with many determinations, the reader is encouraged to carefully examine the details of individual analyses to understand the differences. An illustration of this problem can be given with the well-known star tex2html_wrap_inline995 Vir (HD 113226). This star is frequently used as a comparison star in detailed analyses. The Catalogue gives 15 values of [Fe/H] with respect to the Sun for tex2html_wrap_inline997 Vir, ranging between -0.10 dex and +0.21 dex. What value should be taken as the true metallicity of tex2html_wrap_inline1003 Vir? Due to such disagreements, we did not attempt to standardize the [Fe/H] values of the Catalogue to the solar one.

We have been requested several times, between the successive editions, to include an average value of the different determinations of [Fe/H] for each star. But also for this Edition we have upheld our initial decision to publish the original values from the literature, the mean value being subjected to change at each edition, and a straight mean between values of unequal quality being physically unjustified. A weighted mean would have involved a number of subjective judgements and the development of some scheme for compensating for systematic differences and normalizations between individual investigations. For those who want to use a mean anyway, without making an "educated" weighting, we recommend keeping only recent determinations obtained with high S/N ratios, from spectroscopy with Reticon or CCD detectors. However it must be noted that [Fe/H] determinations are also affected by the adopted effective temperatures, gravities and microturbulent velocities, and that a stellar metal abundance can be in error, even if the observations are of excellent quality.


next previous
Up: A catalogue of

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr