next previous
Up: Physical and chemical

7. Conclusions

A molecular line survey in the 345 GHz window has been performed toward three sources in the W 3 Giant Molecular Cloud with the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope. The analysis not only uses the rotation diagram method, but also statistical equilibrium calculations to determine beam-averaged column densities and physical parameters such as kinetic temperature and density. The column densities are accurate within a factor of two, but the abundances are much more uncertain, however. Clear physical and chemical differences between the three sources have been found.

W 3 IRS4 is the simplest of the three lines of sight studied in this work. The region is well characterised by a temperature of about 55 K and a density of tex2html_wrap_inline5995. Only the sulfur-bearing molecules seem to favour slightly higher temperatures and densities. It is proposed that the star has already broken free of the molecular cloud and has created a PDR on the back side. In addition, a shock, perhaps connected with the penetration of the ionization front into the dense cloud, may be responsible for the creation of the sulfur-bearing molecules and for the elevated temperature and density.

W 3 IRS5 is more complicated, since several physical components are present in the beam. The bulk of the gas is well characterised by a temperature of approximately 100 K and a density of tex2html_wrap_inline5997, but gradients are present. Again the sulfur-bearing molecules seem to trace the denser and hotter gas, which are proposed to be formed in the shock connected with the very powerful outflow. The hottest region is traced by SiO emission. Since this emission is expected to be very compact, interferometer measurements are needed to properly study this component.

Multiple components are also present toward W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline5999), with the molecular emission arising partly from the extended core surrounding both W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline6001) and W 3(OH), and partly from the compact clump near W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline6003). The latter gas is warm (220 K) and dense (tex2html_wrap_inline6005) and contains complex organic molecules.

This survey has provided an unique view on three star-forming clumps within the same parent cloud. Chemical modeling will be the natural next step. In addition, further constraints on the physical structure of the IRS5 region must be obtained through a multi-component excitation analysis of both low- and high excitation lines. Mapping and interferometer data at subarcsec resolution, together with infrared absorption line data, are urgently needed to complete the picture of this high-mass star-forming cloud.

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Fred Baas, Remo Tilanus, David Jansen and the JCMT staff for assistance with the observing runs, and to Todd Groesbeck, Peter Schilke and Eric Herbst for help with updating the line catalogs. They thank Geoff Blake, Lee Mundy, Tom Wilson and Malcolm Walmsley for useful discussions, David Jansen for his efforts in setting up the excitation calculations, and Per Bergman for providing them with his tex2html_wrap_inline6007 collisional rate coefficients. This research was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) through a PIONIER grant, and by the Space Research Organisation Netherlands (SRON).

  Table 7: Gaussian fit parameters

Table 7: (continued)

Table 7: (continued)

Table 7: (continued)

Table 7: (continued)

Table 7: (continued)

Table 7: (continued)

  Table 8: tex2html_wrap_inline6009 Gaussian fit parameters W 3 IRS4

  Table 9: tex2html_wrap_inline6011 Gaussian fit parameters W 3 IRS5

  Table 10: tex2html_wrap_inline6013 Gaussian fit parameters W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline6015)

Table 10: (continued)

Table 10: (continued)

    Table 11: tex2html_wrap_inline6017 Gaussian fit parameters W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline6019)

  Table 12: tex2html_wrap_inline6021 Gaussian fit parameters W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline6023)

  Table 12: continued

   figure1600 figure1607 figure1610 figure1613 figure1616 figure1619

figure1622 figure1625 figure1628 figure1631 figure1634 figure1637

figure1640 figure1643 figure1646 figure1649 figure1652 figure1655

figure1658 figure1661 figure1664 figure1667 figure1670 figure1673

figure1676 figure1679 figure1682 figure1685 figure1688 figure1691

figure1694 figure1697 figure1700 figure1703 figure1706 figure1709

figure1712 figure1715 figure1718 figure1721 figure1724 figure1727

figure1730 figure1733 figure1736 figure1739 figure1742 figure1745

figure1748 figure1751 figure1754 figure1757 figure1760 figure1763 figure1766 figure1769

Figure 4: Four panels containing double side band spectra for W 3 IRS4 (upper spectrum), W 3 IRS5 (middle spectrum) and W 3(tex2html_wrap_inline6025) (lower spectrum). Identifications in the lower side band are given with solid tickmarks, in the upper side band with dotted tickmarks. The lower side band is chosen as the abscissa. Due to different tex2html_wrap_inline6027 for the three sources the upper side bands do not line up. To ease the identification, the frequency ranges for the spectra are given at the top of each panel. The molecular identifications are only given in W 3 IRS5 but apply to all three spectra. The corresponding molecular parameters are found in Tables 7 (click here)-12 (click here)


next previous
Up: Physical and chemical

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr