next previous
Up: Theoretical polarization profiles

4. Conclusions

As an application of the results derived in the previous sections, we have calculated typical Stokes profiles of Htex2html_wrap_inline1498 (tex2html_wrap_inline1500), and of the transitions 7-6 (tex2html_wrap_inline1502) and 12-8 (tex2html_wrap_inline1504) under various conditions.

While Htex2html_wrap_inline1506 has ever been of acknowledged importance in any studies of solar and stellar atmospheres, infrared hydrogen lines, such as the 7-6 and the 12-8 transitions, have only recently been paid the due attention as particularly suitable lines for electric fields measurement in solar plasmas (e.g., Foukal et al. 1986; Moran & Foukal 1991; Foukal & Behr 1995; Casini 1996, CF96). In addition, the 7-6 and the 12-8 transitions happen to be among the strongest lines in the infrared spectrum of hydrogen between 8 and tex2html_wrap_inline1508 observed in solar prominences (Zirker 1985; Foukal 1995), so our choice is well justified.

In Fig. 1 (click here) we illustrate the slab geometry and the directions of the electric and magnetic fields with respect to the observer.

In Figs. 2 (click here), 3 (click here), and 4 (click here), we present our calculation of the Stokes profiles of Htex2html_wrap_inline1510 in the presence of tex2html_wrap_inline1512 and tex2html_wrap_inline1514 (refer to the figure for illustration of the field geometry), for five different values of the optical depth ranging from tex2html_wrap_inline1516 to tex2html_wrap_inline1518, and for the three different forms of the source function considered in this paper (also refer to the figures for illustration of the source function parameters).

  figure539
Figure 1: Geometry of the slab and of the electric and magnetic fields with respect to the line-of-sight, tex2html_wrap_inline1520. The azimuth angles tex2html_wrap_inline1522 and tex2html_wrap_inline1524 are measured from the reference direction for positive Q

  figure546
Figure 2: Calculated polarization profiles of the optically thick Htex2html_wrap_inline1528 in the presence of electric and magnetic fields and thermal-Doppler broadening. A constant source function is assumed

  figure551
Figure 3: Same as Fig. 2, but with a parabolic source function

  figure556
Figure 4: Same as Fig. 2, but with a Gaussian source function

  figure561
Figure 5: Calculated polarization profiles of the transition 7-6 in the presence of electric and magnetic fields and thermal-Doppler broadening. A Gaussian source function is assumed

  figure566
Figure 6: Calculated polarization profiles of the transition 12-8 in the presence of electric and magnetic fields and thermal-Doppler broadening. A Gaussian source function is assumed

  figure571
Figure 7: Calculated polarization profiles of the optically thick Htex2html_wrap_inline1530 in the presence of strong electric and magnetic fields and thermal-Doppler broadening. A Gaussian source function is assumed

Figures 5 (click here) and 6 (click here) analogously show the calculated Stokes profiles of the transitions 7-6 and 12-8 in the presence of tex2html_wrap_inline1532 and tex2html_wrap_inline1534, when the two fields are parallel to each other and both perpendicular to the line-of-sight. The same range of optical depths is considered. However, only the resultant profiles for the Gaussian form of the source function are shown in this paper, since the shapes of the profiles for the other two forms of the source function do not differ noticeably from those given in Figs. 5 (click here) and 6 (click here). The field intensities considered in the above calculations should be in the range of the expected intensities of magnetic and electric fields in prominences and post-flare loops, as suggested by present MHD models of such coronal structures (e.g., Foukal & Hinata 1991; Foukal & Behr 1995). However, the amount of linear polarization that we have obtained for Htex2html_wrap_inline1536 under such physical conditions (cf. Figs. 2 (click here), 3 (click here), and 4 (click here)) is much less than the one actually observed in quiescent solar prominences, where it can attain 1% of the intensity level for the integrated profiles (e.g., Leroy 1981). Our calculations then show that the Zeeman effect in the presence of solar prominence magnetic fields cannot actually be responsible for the observed linear polarization in Htex2html_wrap_inline1538, which is rather due to the strong anisotropy of the incident radiation field from the underlying photosphere. On the contrary, even neglecting atomic polarization, a relevant linear polarization signature due to the linear Stark effect is expected in infrared hydrogen lines such as 7-6 and 12-8, for electric-field intensities as small as tex2html_wrap_inline1540 (cf. Figs. 5 (click here) and 6 (click here)).

We also considered the calculation of the Stokes profiles of Htex2html_wrap_inline1542 in the presence of very strong fields (not attainable in the solar atmosphere). Figure 7 (click here) shows such profiles calculated in the case of a Gaussian source function, and for a wide range of optical depths.

This last figure illustrates very well the kind of frequency modulations of the polarized line profiles which can be expected because of the transport of radiation through an optically-thick medium embedded with electric and magnetic fields. Even more it stresses the urgent need for realistic radiative-transfer calculations of the Stokes profiles of (hydrogen) lines forming in the presence of external fields (possibly including non-LTE effects as well), in order to improve the present state of the diagnostics of simultaneous electric and magnetic fields in astrophysical plasmas.

This would likely increase our understanding of many processes (e.g., impact polarization from accelerated particles, current dissipation in neutral sheets, heating of corona, triggering of flares), occurring in solar magnetized plasmas, which are still lacking a definitive explanation, and in which electric fields should also play a primary role.


next previous
Up: Theoretical polarization profiles

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr