next previous
Up: The effective layer

2. The single layer case

In this section it is assumed that only a single, thin layer, is responsible for the star wandering. We recall here that the multicolour LGS absolute tilt determination technique is based on the measurement of the differential angle of arrival of two different colour LGSs excited by a monochromatic laser beam. Following Foy et al. (1995), when the layer is introducing a tilt tex2html_wrap_inline975 at a given primary wavelenght, the two colour beams will experience a deflection's difference tex2html_wrap_inline977 given by:


equation226

where n is the refractive index at the primary wavelength and tex2html_wrap_inline981 is the variation of refractive index of the air between the two LGS colours. The tilting layer is placed at height h while the LGS is excited at height H. While the tilting layer can take place in any h = 0tex2html_wrap_inline98920 km, the mesospheric Sodium LGS exhibits a characteristic height H = 95 km (Happer et al. 1994). In the following we refer to RED and BLUE respectively to the longest and shortest wavelengths of the two LGS colours. Moreover, we'll assume that the exciting beam is a red one, and that the LGS will produce both a red and a blue beam; for sake of simplicity we also assume that the laser firing and the AO observations are performed at the local zenith. None of these assumptions will affect significantly the conclusions.

Referring to Fig. 1 (click here), we consider the chief ray of the beam from the LGS to the observing telescope, where the pupil is located.

  figure233
Figure 1: The apparent displacement tex2html_wrap_inline993 between two colour artificial beacons as seen by the ground observer is slightly different than the quantity tex2html_wrap_inline995. Their ratio depends upon the h altitude. It is also shown in the upper-left corner inset how, assumming tex2html_wrap_inline999, the measured angle tex2html_wrap_inline1001 strictly coincides with tex2html_wrap_inline1003

The tex2html_wrap_inline1005 position of the LGS following the two colour beams can be easily derived under the assumption that all the considered angles are very small.

For the red beam:


equation238
while, following the blue laser beam path:


equation241

Equating the expressions given in Eqs. (2) and (3) we get:


equation244

From Eq. (4) one can see that the measurement tex2html_wrap_inline1007 will depend upon both tex2html_wrap_inline1009 and h. In the case of a single layer with a constant altitude this will translate into the introduction of a scale factor close to 1. In fact, h is usually less than tex2html_wrap_inline1015. However, a time evolving value for h will introduce an apparent relative displacement tex2html_wrap_inline1019 of the red and blue beacons undistinguishable from the displacement introduced by the temporal evolution of the tilt tex2html_wrap_inline1021. One can expect that, using the more realistic multi-layer approach, some spreading of the effective h can introduce an error source in the absolute tilt determination.


next previous
Up: The effective layer

Copyright by the European Southern Observatory (ESO)
web@ed-phys.fr