Optical parameters relevant for High Angular Resolution at Paranal from GSM instrument and surface layer contribution
Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser., 144 1 (2000) 39-44
Published online: 2000-05-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
A comparison of next-generation turbulence profiling instruments at Paranal
R Griffiths, L Bardou, T Butterley, J Osborn, R Wilson, E Bustos, A Tokovinin, M Le Louarn and A OtarolaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 529 (1) 320 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae434
Integrated turbulence parameters' estimation from NAOMI adaptive optics telemetry data
Nuno Morujão, Carlos Correia, Paulo Andrade, Julien Woillez and Paulo GarciaAstronomy & Astrophysics 678 A193 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346952
Astronomical seeing and ground-level optical turbulence at Delingha observatory on the northern Tibetan Plateau
Liming Zhu, Hanjiu Zhang, Liang Zhang, Xuefeng Duan, Xinying Lu, Ying Liu, Xuebin Li, Gang Sun and Ningquan WengMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525 (3) 3236 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2493
Estimation and characterization of the refractive index structure constant within the marine atmospheric boundary layer
Hanjiu Zhang, Liming Zhu, Gang Sun, et al.Applied Optics 61 (33) 9762 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.465463
Evaluation of the day-time ground-level turbulence at Mt Wumingshan with a microthermal sensor
Tengfei Song, Yu Liu, Zhanchuan Cai, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (2) 3070 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1469
Atmospheric turbulence model for direct fire ballistics
Tomas Bober and Thomas RecchiaThe Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology 18 (4) 333 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512920906476
(2021)
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1645
(2020)
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-0757
(2019)
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1869
First direct detection of a polarized companion outside a resolved circumbinary disk around CS Chamaeleonis
C. Ginski, M. Benisty, R. G. van Holstein, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 616 A79 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732417
Statistical Characterization of Atmospheric Turbulence Behavior Responsible for Sonic Boom Waveform Deformation
Hidemi Takahashi, Masashi Kanamori, Yusuke Naka and Yoshikazu MakinoAIAA Journal 56 (2) 673 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056005
Online estimation of the wavefront outer scale profile from adaptive optics telemetry
A. Guesalaga, B. Neichel, C. M. Correia, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 1984 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2548
(2017)
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0279
Application of a regional model to astronomical site testing in western Antarctica
Mark Falvey and Patricio M. RojoTheoretical and Applied Climatology 125 (3-4) 841 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1794-x
Validation through simulations of a $C_n^2$ profiler for the ESO/VLT Adaptive Optics Facility
A. Garcia-Rissmann, A. Guesalaga, J. Kolb, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 448 (3) 2594 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv169
Site evaluation study for the Indian National Large Solar Telescope using microthermal measurements
K. DhananjayMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (3) 2092 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1985
9146 91462R (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2055295
Simulation of Atmospheric Wave-Fronts with Turbulence Intermittency
Giorgio SedmakInternational Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 04 (01) 155 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2014.41014
Comparison of fringe-tracking algorithms for single-mode near-infrared long-baseline interferometers
É. Choquet, J. Menu, G. Perrin, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 569 A2 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220223
A new concept for the combination of optical interferometers and high-resolution spectrographs
Simon Albrecht, Andreas Quirrenbach, Robert N. Tubbs and Ramon VinkExperimental Astronomy 27 (3) 157 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-009-9181-6
Multi-instrument measurement campaign at Paranal in 2007
W. Dali Ali, A. Ziad, A. Berdja, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 524 A73 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015178
Closed-loop control of a woofer–tweeter adaptive optics system using wavelet-based phase reconstruction
Peter J. Hampton, Pan Agathoklis, Rodolphe Conan and Colin BradleyJournal of the Optical Society of America A 27 (11) A145 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.27.00A145
Estimating the phase in groundbased interferometry: performance comparison between singlemode and multimode schemes
E. Tatulli, N. Blind, J. P. Berger, A. Chelli and F. MalbetAstronomy & Astrophysics 524 A65 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913356
Wavefront reconstruction over a circular aperture using gradient data extrapolated via the mirror equations
Peter J. Hampton, Pan Agathoklis and Colin BradleyApplied Optics 48 (20) 4018 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.004018
Comparison of minimum-norm maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori wavefront reconstructions for large adaptive optics systems
Clémentine Béchet, Michel Tallon and Éric ThiébautJournal of the Optical Society of America A 26 (3) 497 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.000497
Comparison between atmospheric turbulence models by angle-of-arrival covariance measurements
J. Maire, A. Ziad, J. Borgnino and F. MartinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 386 (2) 1064 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13106.x
A New Wave-Front Reconstruction Method for Adaptive Optics Systems Using Wavelets
Peter J. Hampton, Pan Agathoklis and Colin BradleyIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 2 (5) 781 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2006386
Interferometric data reduction with AMBER/VLTI. Principle, estimators, and illustration
E. Tatulli, F. Millour, A. Chelli, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 464 (1) 29 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20064799
The FALCON concept: multi-object adaptive optics and atmospheric tomography for integral field spectroscopy - principles and performance on an 8-m telescope
F. Assémat, E. Gendron and F. HammerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 376 (1) 287 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11422.x
Deep imaging survey of the environment of α Centauri
P. Kervella, F. Thévenin, V. Coudé du Foresto and F. MignardAstronomy & Astrophysics 459 (2) 669 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065966
Fresnel diffraction and polychromatic effects on angle-of-arrival fluctuations
Amokrane Berdja, Julien Borgnino and Abdenour IrbahJournal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 8 (3) 244 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/8/3/004
Wavefront outer scale deduced from interferometric dispersed fringes
J. Maire, A. Ziad, J. Borgnino, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 448 (3) 1225 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20052806
FALCON: multi-object AO
Eric Gendron, François Assémat, François Hammer, Pascal Jagourel, Fanny Chemla, Philippe Laporte, Mathieu Puech, Michel Marteaud, Frédéric Zamkotsian, Arnaud Liotard, Jean-Marc Conan, Thierry Fusco and Norbert HubinComptes Rendus. Physique 6 (10) 1110 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2005.10.012
Altitude, Elevation, and Seeing
René RacinePublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 117 (830) 401 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/429307
Squared Visibility Estimators: Calibrating Biases to Reach Very High Dynamic Range
Guy Perrin and Stephen T. RidgwayThe Astrophysical Journal 626 (2) 1138 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1086/430103
Site testing in summer at Dome C, Antarctica
E. Aristidi, A. Agabi, E. Fossat, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 444 (2) 651 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053529
NAOS on-line characterization of turbulence parameters and adaptive optics performance
T Fusco, G Rousset, D Rabaud, et al.Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 6 (6) 585 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/6/6/014
Wide-field adaptive optics for deep-field spectroscopy in the visible
M. Le Louarn and N. HubinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 349 (3) 1009 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07580.x
Integration of the atmospheric fluctuations in a dual-field optical interferometer: The short exposure regime
G. Daigne and J.-F. LestradeAstronomy & Astrophysics 406 (3) 1167 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030662
Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics with laser guide stars: performance in the infrared and visible
M. Le LouarnMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 334 (4) 865 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05552.x
The Optical/Infrared Astronomical Quality of High Atacama Sites. I. Preliminary Results of Optical Seeing
Riccardo Giovanelli, Jeremy Darling, Marc Sarazin, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 113 (785) 789 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1086/322135
Optimized modal tomography in adaptive optics
A. Tokovinin, M. Le Louarn, E. Viard, N. Hubin and R. ConanAstronomy & Astrophysics 378 (2) 710 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011213