An objective and automatic cluster finder: An improvement of the matched-filter method
Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser., 130 3 (1998) 567-579
Published online: 1998-06-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
An optical catalog of galaxy clusters obtained from an adaptive matched filter finder applied to SDSS DR9 data
P. Banerjee, T. Szabo, E. Pierpaoli, G. Franco, M. Ortiz, A. Oramas and B. TornelloNew Astronomy 58 61 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2017.07.008
Multiscale probability mapping: groups, clusters and an algorithmic search for filaments in SDSS
Anthony G. Smith, Andrew M. Hopkins, Richard W. Hunstead and Kevin A. PimbbletMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422 (1) 25 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20400.x
AN OPTICAL CATALOG OF GALAXY CLUSTERS OBTAINED FROM AN ADAPTIVE MATCHED FILTER FINDER APPLIED TO SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 6
T. Szabo, E. Pierpaoli, F. Dong, A. Pipino and J. GunnThe Astrophysical Journal 736 (1) 21 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/21
Alignment of brightest cluster galaxies with their host clusters
Martin Niederste-Ostholt, Michael A. Strauss, Feng Dong, Benjamin P. Koester and Timothy A. McKayMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16597.x
Optical Cluster Finding with an Adaptive Matched‐Filter Technique: Algorithm and Comparison with Simulations
Feng Dong, Elena Pierpaoli, James E. Gunn and Risa H. WechslerThe Astrophysical Journal 676 (2) 868 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/522490
The Northern Sky Optical Cluster Survey. IV. An Intermediate-Redshift Galaxy Cluster Catalog and the Comparison of Two Detection Algorithms
P. A. A. Lopes, R. R. de Carvalho, R. R. Gal, et al.The Astronomical Journal 128 (3) 1017 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/423038
Exploring the selection of galaxy clusters and groups: an optical survey for X-ray dark clusters
David G. Gilbank, Richard G. Bower, F. J. Castander and B. L. ZieglerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 348 (2) 551 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07335.x
The multiplicity function of galaxies
E. Puddu, E. De Filippis, G. Longo, S. Andreon and R. R. GalAstronomy & Astrophysics 403 (1) 73 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030254
Comparing filters for the detection of point sources
R. B. Barreiro, J. L. Sanz, D. Herranz and E. Martinez-GonzalezMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 342 (1) 119 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06520.x
Detecting Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Monte Carlo Comparison of Cluster Detection Algorithms
Rita Seung Jung Kim, Jeremy V. Kepner, Marc Postman, et al.The Astronomical Journal 123 (1) 20 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/324727
The Aquarius Superclusters. I. Identification of Clusters and Superclusters
César A. Caretta, Marcio A. G. Maia, Wataru Kawasaki and Christopher N. A. WillmerThe Astronomical Journal 123 (3) 1200 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/338894
Positional Coincidence between the High‐Latitude Steady Unidentified Gamma‐Ray Sources and Possibly Merging Clusters of Galaxies
Wataru Kawasaki and Tomonori TotaniThe Astrophysical Journal 576 (2) 679 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/341884
A Matched-Filter Analysis of the Tidal Tails of the Globular Cluster Palomar 5
Constance M. Rockosi, Michael Odenkirchen, Eva K. Grebel, et al.The Astronomical Journal 124 (1) 349 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/340957
The Cut-and-Enhance Method: Selecting Clusters of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Commissioning Data
Tomotsugu Goto, Maki Sekiguchi, Robert C. Nichol, et al.The Astronomical Journal 123 (4) 1807 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/339303
Scale‐adaptive Filters for the Detection/Separation of Compact Sources
D. Herranz, J. L. Sanz, R. B. Barreiro and E. Martinez‐GonzalezThe Astrophysical Journal 580 (1) 610 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1086/342651
The Stanford Cluster Search: Scope, Method, and Preliminary Results
Jeffrey A. Willick, Keith L. Thompson, Benjamin F. Mathiesen, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 113 (784) 658 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1086/320814
Finding galaxy clusters using Voronoi tessellations
M. Ramella, W. Boschin, D. Fadda and M. NoninoAstronomy & Astrophysics 368 (3) 776 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20010071
The Local Space Density of Optically Selected Clusters of Galaxies
D. A. Bramel, R. C. Nichol and A. C. PopeThe Astrophysical Journal 533 (2) 601 (2000)
https://doi.org/10.1086/308713
An Automated Cluster Finder: The Adaptive Matched Filter
Jeremy Kepner, Xiaohui Fan, Neta Bahcall, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 517 (1) 78 (1999)
https://doi.org/10.1086/307160
The [ITAL]Hubble[/ITAL] [ITAL]Space[/ITAL] [ITAL]Telescope[/ITAL] Medium Deep Survey Cluster Sample: Methodology and Data
E. J. Ostrander, R. C. Nichol, K. U. Ratnatunga and R. E. GriffithsThe Astronomical Journal 116 (6) 2644 (1998)
https://doi.org/10.1086/300627