Two complementary approaches have been proposed by both LFI and HFI teams for reducing the impact of instrumental systematic effects on anisotropy measurements: the "hardware'' approach, i.e. design mission strategy and instruments in order to minimize all the potential systematic effects, and the "software'' approach, i.e. develop data analysis methods to further reduce residual effects in the data.
The detailed design of the PLANCK telescope is continuously
changing with the aim of optimizing its performance.
On the other hand, the optical framework and the basic
concepts to address the relation between optical performances
and scientific goals are quite general and possibly applicable
also to other CMB anisotropy experiments.
We present here a methodological study on the optical performance
of the PLANCK-like telescopes, by comparing a suitable options
of optical designs and analyzing their impact on the observations
of CMB anisotropy measurements.
After a brief discussion of the relative importance of the optical
distortions near and far from the central direction of
each beam in the sky field of view, we focus on the impact
of main beam distortions on PLANCK data.
Main beam distortions may introduce
a degradation of the angular resolution
and of the sensitivity per resolution element.
These two last effects can be seen as orthogonal
to each other in the space
of angular scales and
temperature anisotropy or, equivalently, in the space of
(Mandolesi et al. 1997; Burigana et al. 1998a).
The present analysis is devoted to recognize the "hardware'' requirements
of PLANCK-like telescopes in order to keep at acceptable levels
the effects of main beam distortions.
In Sect. 2 we present a summary of the recent
developments (Mandolesi et al. 1998; Puget et al. 1998) in the
design of the PLANCK mission since the Phase A study
(Bersanelli et al. 1996) focussing on the aspects relevant for the
optical performance. In Sect. 3 we present the set of
three of optical designs assumed as references for the present
discussion, the basic framework of our optical simulations and our
main results for the beam shapes; other optical configurations
concerning telescopes with worst optical quality at the primary
mirror edges are considered in Appendix A. We consider here the
case of the "clean'' 100 GHz channels which are the most
important for the primary cosmological goal, having small
foreground contaminations. Moreover, in the new design of the
Focal Plane Unit, the channels at highest frequencies of HFI are
located very close to the telescope optical axis, where optical
distortions are expected to decrease in order to compensate their
increasing with the frequency. We present also a brief discussion
of the optical performance at 30 GHz in Appendix B. In
Sect. 4 we estimate the implications of beam
distortions by means of three different and complementary methods
of analysis for quantifying the relevance of optical aberrations
and by evaluating the final impact on CMB science. We set there
the constraints to have a telescope "good enough'' to reach the
key goal of
resolution at 100 GHz.
Section 5 concerns the limits on the edge taper for
which the emission from the Solar System objects and from the
Galaxy entering the sidelobes are acceptable without compromising
the angular resolution. This is a first order analysis and
therefore gives only an indication of the relevance of edge taper,
sidelobes pick-up versus angular resolution. More detailed studies
on the impact of sidelobes contamination have been done recently
(e.g. De Maagt et al. 1998; Burigana et al. 1999b;
Puget & Delabrouille 1999; Wandelt & Górski 1999).
Finally, we discuss the mission impact of a such telescope, by
dealing both with building problems and with cost problems, and
draw out our main conclusions in Sect. 6.
![]() |
Figure 1: New symmetric configuration accepted as current baseline (Mandolesi et al. 1998; Puget et al. 1998). The latter demands greater off-axis performance of the telescope due to the larger mean distance from optical axis for the LFI beams |
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)