The first absolute proper motion of M 10 based on the Hipparcos system
was given in Geffert et al. (1997),
which was later used in Odenkirchen et al. (1997) and
Dinescu et al. (1999).
However, as mentioned in Odenkirchen et al. (1997),
the result of M 10 was only preliminary due to the small number of
Hipparcos stars used for the reduction of the plates.
The use of additional plates from
Shanghai has led to a significant lower proper motion in declination.
However, even for this sample of plates the solution is
only moderately stable: omitting one reference star
leads to an absolute proper motion of M 10, which
differs from the original solution by about more than the mean
uncertainties of the absolute proper motions.
Fortunately, this is not the case for the denser ACT catalogue.
In summary, the use of the ACT catalogue
resulted in a more stable solution, while the use of Hipparcos
stars provided the more direct link to an extragalactic
reference frame.
The catalogues based on the ACT catalogue (Urban et al. 1998) and
on the Hipparcos catalogue (ESA 1997) contributed
therefore with equal
weight to the final absolute proper motion of the globular
cluster M 10.
We obtained a mean absolute proper motion of
mas/yr
and
mas/yr.
Together with the distance from the Sun of 4.3 kpc and a radial velocity of
km s-1 (Harris 1996) we have calculated the velocity components in
a system of galactic standard at rest (U,V,W), peri- and apogalactic
distances
,
,
eccentricity e and the z-component of
the angular momentum of the orbit using a simple logarithmic galactic mass
model (see e.g. Dauphole et al. 1996).
These data are shown in Table 7.
Figure 2 gives the orbit of M 10 integrated over 10 Gyr backwards
according to the method of Allen & Santillán (1991) using
the programme of Odenkirchen et al. (1997).
Object | U | V | W | ![]() |
![]() |
e | Iz |
[km s-1] | [km s-1] | [km s-1] | [kpc] | [kpc] | [kpc km s-1] | ||
M 10 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)