next previous
Up: Search for a possible bursts


2 Space-time correlations between GRBs and upward-going muons

We look for correlations with 2233 GRBs in the Batse Catalogs 3B and 4B (Meegan [1997]) collected since 21 Apr. 1991 to 5 Oct. 1998 and 894 of the 909 upward-going muons detected by MACRO during this period (see Fig. 1). Considering Batse angular accuracy, we estimate that a half-cone of $20^{\circ }$ ( $10^{\circ }$) contains 99.8$\%$ (96.8$\%$) of $\nu$ sources (if GRB sources are $\nu$ sources, too). The same percentages of upward-going muons are contained in these half-cones from the GRB sources. As a matter of fact, we calculate via Monte Carlo the fraction of signal lost, which depends on the $\nu$ spectral index, multiple scattering of muons during propagation in the rock and MACRO angular resolution. Using various cone apertures, we estimate that this fraction is negligible for $\ge 10^{\circ}$. The area for upgoing muon detection in the direction of the GRBs averaged over all the bursts is 119 m2. Its value is small because MACRO is sensitive to neutrinos only in the lower hemisphere and because it was incomplete in the period 1991-1994. We find no statistically significant correlation between neutrino event and GRB directions and detection times. As shown in Fig. 2, we find no events in a window of $\pm 200$ s inside $10^{\circ }$ from GRB directions and 1 event inside $20^{\circ }$, which was measured after 39.4 s from the Batse GRB of 22 Sep. 1995 (4B 950922). For this burst the radius of the positional error box in the Batse catalog is 3.86$^{\circ}$, much smaller than the angular distance of 17.6$^{\circ}$ at which we find the neutrino event. The expected number of atmospheric $\nu$ events is computed with the delayed coincidence technique. We expect 0.035 (0.075) events in $10^{\circ }$ ( $20^{\circ }$). The corresponding upper limits (90$\%$ c.l.) for the upward-going muon flux are 0.87 10-9 cm-2 ( 1.44 10-9 cm-2) upward-going muons per average burst. These limits exclude an extreme cosmic string-type model reported in (Halzen [1996]), which results in $10^{-1} \,
\mu$ cm-2, while according to a fireball scenario model in (Waxman [1997]), a burst at a distance of 100 Mpc producing 0.4 1051 erg in neutrinos of around 1014 eV would produce $\sim 6~10^{-11}$ cm-2 upward-going muons.
  \begin{figure}\resizebox{8.7cm}{6.cm}{\includegraphics{ds1830f1.eps}}\end{figure} Figure 1: MACRO upward-going muon (dashed line) and Batse GRB (solid line) distributions versus year


  \begin{figure}\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics{ds1830f2.eps}}\end{figure} Figure 2: Difference in detection times vs. cosine of angular separation between Batse GRBs and upward-going $\mu $s. a) and b) have different time scales. In a) the $\pm 200$ s - $10^{\circ }$, $20^{\circ }$ windows are indicated


next previous
Up: Search for a possible bursts

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)