Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 142, 13-24
N. Ginestet1 - J.M. Carquillat1 et C. Jaschek2
1 - Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique (UMR 5572), 14 avenue Edouard
Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
2 -
Observatoire de Strasbourg, URA 1280 (CNRS), 11 rue de l'Université, 67000 Strasbourg,
France
Reçu le 20 juillet ; accepté le 10 novembre, 1999
Contrary to what is claimed in other papers,
the absolute magnitude domain devoted to
the giant stars does not overlap the domain of
dwarfs. We find that the discrepancies
between absolute magnitudes from
Hipparcos data and absolute magnitudes
deduced from Schmidt-Kaler calibrations
increase with the relative error
on
the parallaxes. So, for
only
3% of the stars present a discrepancy of one
luminosity class, while this percentage
reaches 54% for
.
Curiously, the luminosity of the giants seems to increase with the distance of the stars, whereas the supergiants of the sample appear underluminous at least for d < 600 pc!
We point out a list of 14 MK standards
whose luminosity classes may be erroneous
and need a new spectral classification, in the
near infrared. The case of composite-spectrum binaries is also discussed. Most of
these are too distant for accurate parallaxes
even with Hipparcos: only sixteen stars have
;
for these, we give new
spectral classifications in agreement with
both our classifications in the near infrared of
the cool components and Hipparcos data.
Finally, for stars having high-precision
parallaxes (
)
there is no serious
problem for Schmidt-Kaler calibrations
whith respect to Hipparcos data. The data
corresponding to parallaxes of lower
precisions should be used with caution and
only for statistical analyses.
Key words: stars: fundamental parameters -- stars: distances
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)