next previous
Up: A high sensitivity H


2 Observations

The observations were made with the 30 m-dish of the Instituto Argentino de Radioastronomía (IAR). They were started on June 1994 and it took nearly 3.5 years to complete the data acquisition phase. The half power beam width (HPBW) and the main beam efficiency at 21-cm are 30$^\prime$ and $\sim$ 0.7, respectively. The movements of the dish, (equatorial mounting) due to constructive constraints, are limited to -90$^\circ $ $\leq\delta\leq -$9 $.\!\!^\circ$1, and $\pm$30$^\circ $ from the local meridian. The dual-channel front-end consisted of helium-cooled HEM amplifiers with a noise temperature of $\sim$20 K. The total system temperature against cold sky was about 35 K. The backend spectral line analyzer was the former 1008-channel autocorrelator from the Arecibo Observatory (at present at the IAR on a long term loan basis), in its 1.6 bits sampling mode. A bandwidth of 5 MHz was used throughout the observations, yielding a velocity separation of 1.05 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$ and a velocity resolution of 1.27 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$. These figures are similar to those of the Leiden/Dwingeloo survey, namely 1.03 and 1.25 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$, respectively. The total spectrometer velocity coverage was thus $\sim$1056 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$, centered at the radial velocity V = 0 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$. In this way, besides covering the entire velocity range expected from the overall galactic H I-emission, all but the most extreme HVCs, and the H I emission arising from the Magellanic System, were also observed. After the final data reduction, the effective velocity range covered by the survey is -450 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$ $\leq V \leq$ +400 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$, since channels close to the edges of the bandpass had to be dropped due to the effects of the filter that was used to set the bandpass. All radial velocities in this paper are referred to the Local Standard of Rest (LSR).

A total of 50980 different sky positions were observed in this work. In order to carry out the actual data taking, the sky area to be surveyed, with the only exception of the southern galactic pole cap, was divided in 2012 square cells 2 $.\!\!^\circ$5 in size. Each of these cells consisted of 25 positions. The remaining 680 positions were observed in 83 additional cells, containing each a varying number of points. The reasons for these grouping are tied to the limitations in the tracking capability of the antenna mentioned above and to the integration time. Since the total system temperature changes with galactic direction due to the different galactic background contributions, the integration time per position was chosen in order to reach our target rms noise of $\sim$ 70 mK. Typically, at high latitudes the integration time was of the order of 210 seconds, while at low latitudes it was about 270 seconds. The so-called total power observing mode, in its Standard Bonn Method flavour (Allen & Shostak [1979]) was used to perform the observations.


 

 
Table 2: Calibration points for the IAR survey

Point
Gal. Long. Gal. lat. Peak $T_{{\rm b}}$ Peak Velocity Prof. area Vel. range
      (K) ( $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$) (K $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$) ( $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$)

           
IAR0($\equiv$S9) 356 $.\!\!^\circ$00 -4 $.\!\!^\circ$00 84.2 $\pm$ 1.0 +5.2 932 -1.5 to +15.2
             
IAR1 4 $.\!\!^\circ$00 -25 $.\!\!^\circ$00 44.4 $\pm$ 0.6 +6.3 287.6 $\pm$ 3.2 +0.5 to +12.0
             
IAR2 304 $.\!\!^\circ$55 -28 $.\!\!^\circ$87 41.1 $\pm$ 0.3 +2.1 282.6 $\pm$ 3.9 -3.6 to +7.8
             
IAR3 304 $.\!\!^\circ$65 -33 $.\!\!^\circ$23 46.9 $\pm$ 0.4 +3.1 288.4 $\pm$ 5.3 -2.6 to +8.9
             
IAR4 298 $.\!\!^\circ$56 -37 $.\!\!^\circ$75 40.6 $\pm$ 0.5 +2.1 266.8 $\pm$ 3.8 -3.6 to +7.8
             
IAR5 301 $.\!\!^\circ$32 -28 $.\!\!^\circ$73 33.4 $\pm$ 0.6 +1.0 270.5 $\pm$ 3.2 -4.7 to +6.8
             
IAR6 219 $.\!\!^\circ$50 -12 $.\!\!^\circ$00 80.9 $\pm$ 0.7 +4.2 648.9 $\pm$ 5.9 -1.5 to +9.9
             
IAR7 247 $.\!\!^\circ$00 +17 $.\!\!^\circ$00 64.2 $\pm$ 0.7 -3.1 481.5 $\pm$ 5.5 -8.9 to +2.6
             
IAR8 290 $.\!\!^\circ$00 +5 $.\!\!^\circ$00 64.3 $\pm$ 0.6 -10.5 665.7 $\pm$ 6.0 -16.2 to -4.7
             
IAR9 306 $.\!\!^\circ$00 +10 $.\!\!^\circ$00 57.1 $\pm$ 1.0 -11.5 460.6 $\pm$ 5.3 -17.3 to -5.8
             
IAR10 330 $.\!\!^\circ$50 +10 $.\!\!^\circ$00 50.6 $\pm$ 0.8 +3.1 387.9 $\pm$ 6.0 -2.6 to +8.9
             

           


Before undertaking the survey data taking phase, a program to determine the telescope pointing correction was performed (Morras & Bajaja [1994]). The resulting pointing corrections were incorporated to the observing system. The overall pointing accuracy of the antenna was within $\pm 2'$ ($\leq$HPBW/15), for wind speeds lower than $\sim$3 m s-1. Our adopted brightness temperature scale is tied to the point S9 (l = 356 $.\!\!^\circ$00, $b = -4\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$ }00$) recommended as one of the standard fields by the IAU (van Woerden [1970]). Due to the restrictions in the source tracking, we have defined a series of secondary H I calibrators. These points, whose main characteristics are given in Table 2, were chosen in such a way that two of them were always within the telescope horizon (Morras & Cappa [1995]). The errors quoted in column six of Table 2, correspond to the rms value of the mean of individual measurements. In addition, a study of the H I-distribution across our prime calibrator, region S9 (or point IAR0 in our nomenclature), was carried out. Neutral hydrogen profiles were observed every 0 $.\!\!^\circ$25 (in both l and b), over a square area of 2 $.\!\!^\circ$0, centered on the calibration point. Williams ([1973]) obtained a value of 953 $\pm$ 71 K $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$ for the integral of the brightness temperature at S9 over the velocity range -1.05 to +14.75 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$. Since the beam of the Hat-Creek telescope (HPBW$\sim$35') was slightly larger than ours (HPBW$\sim$30'), the IAR observations were smoothed down in order to match the angular resolution of Williams' observations. In this way the ratio of the brightness temperature scales was found to be $I_{{\rm Hat-Creek}}$(S9)/ $I_{{\rm IAR}}$(S9) = 1.023. Hence, the brightness temperature scale of the IAR observations was defined in such a way as to match a mean value of 932 K $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$ for the mentioned integral.

Regarding our "brightness temperature scale", a word of caution is necessary. Indeed, to obtain a telescope independent birghtness temperature scale (Kalberla et al. 1982) stray radiation contamination should be removed first from the calibration points observed throughout the survey. Since this has not been done yet, the figures given in Table 2, in columns fourth and sixth, may be slightly in error.

Furthermore, five cold points distributed all over the observable sky and having a very low HI emissivity, were also selected (see Table 3). Their main purpose was to estimate the stray radiation from the sidelobes which enter the cold point profiles at different LSR velocities during the observation years. This correction is expected to be applied to the entire database by Kalberla & Hartmann (1999) using a model for the antenna pattern. The procedure will be similar to the one applied to the northern H I survey. (Hartmann & Burton [1997]) with the advantage that for the construction of the model, a whole sky H I survey is now available. The modelling will be facilitated also by the equatorial mounting of the IAR dish which means that the orientation of the antenna pattern, with respect to the sky, is constant. We cannot specify in advance the effects of the stray radiation in our spectra. We can only estimate these effects on the basis of the results of the application of the correction to the northern survey which have been described in the above mentioned paper. From these results we may say that the most important effect is produced by the near sidelobes (NSL) which amounts to about of 10 to 15% of the observed intensity with a spectral distribution similar to the one produced by the main beam. The far sidelobes (FSL) add signals much more attenuated and with a spectral distribution generally not related to the main one. The effect of the FSL will be noticeable mainly far from the galactic plane, in regions where the H I signal is relativity weak.

It is worth mentioning that since our telescope never goes below an elevation of 35$^\circ $, the extinction caused by the atmospheric air-mass column traversed by the 21-cm radiation before reaching the telescope, has been neglected. Usually, during a typical observing session several of our programm cells were observed. Right before and after a given cell was observed, a calibration point and a reference spectrum, to estimate the shape of the bandpass, were taken. The latter was observed by shifting the central velocity of the signal-band by +1000 $\rm\, km\, s^{-1}$. Due to the stability of the overall system parameters, all reference spectra of a given session were averaged, producing a new interference-free high S/N reference spectrum, before carrying out the actual data reduction. The latter comprises the following main steps:

1.
The mean reference spectrum of a given session was subtracted from every individual H I profile observed within a given program cell;
2.
When present, interferences and faulty channels were removed from the output profile obtained in the previous step. Since many spectra were contaminated by spurious signals, most of them arising from man-made interferences and our local network of PCs, special care was taken in their removal. Most of the times the offending signal was a narrow spike only a few channels wide, but in some cases the interference was so strong that the entire H I profile was damaged beyond recovery. In this case, the corrupted spectrum was dropped from the observed cell and reobserved;
3.
By fitting a polynomial to those regions of the H I profile judged to be free of line emission, the instrumental baseline was removed. Admittedly, the baseline-fitting proved to be the most difficult and time consuming aspect of the data reduction procedure. The degree of the polynomial varied between 4 and 7. The objetive in each case was to correct the baseline in the best possible way without affecting features which corresponded obviously to the H I signals and without introducing ripples. This was possible because each spectrum was treated individually;
4.
After removing the baseline, the entire profile was multiplied by a constant value, in order to convert the observed antenna temperature scale into a brightness temperature one. The factors were derived from the calibration points observed immediately before and after each cell.

The cold points were individually reduced following a similar procedure. The data reduction itself was carried out using the DRAWSPEC program (Liszt [1987]), and a local version of it, especially developed by E. Bajaja (1999) to meet the requirements of our observing scheme. Using this especially tailored program, the data reduction process was considerably speeded up.

Once a given cell was fully reduced, a minimum of three and a maximum of five positions out of the total 25, were reobserved with a shorter integration time, as a consistency check on the brightness temperature scale. When the reduced profiles of this new set of observations didn't differ from the original ones by more than 5$\%$, the corresponding cell was included in the final survey database. The upper limit of 5$\%$ was set for low latitude cells ($\mid$b$\mid\leq$ 60$^\circ $), while for high latitude ones this criterion was relaxed, and a higher value of 10$\%$ was adopted. This was because at high latitudes the H I emission is usually weak and the contamination by stray radiation could be quite different among both sets of observations, which were usually separated by intervals of about three to nine months from each other.


 

 
Table 3: Cold points for the IAR survey

Point
Gal. Long. Gal. lat.

   
COLD1 11 $.\!\!^\circ$44 -59 $.\!\!^\circ$82

COLD2

221 $.\!\!^\circ$98 -52 $.\!\!^\circ$01

COLD3

233 $.\!\!^\circ$23 -27 $.\!\!^\circ$54

COLD4

261 $.\!\!^\circ$00 -40 $.\!\!^\circ$00

COLD5

347 $.\!\!^\circ$31 -75 $.\!\!^\circ$54
     

   



  \begin{figure}\resizebox{8.8cm}{!}
{\includegraphics{ds1761f1.eps}}\end{figure} Figure 1: Southern sky HI distribution from the IAR Survey. The velocity range is -450 to +400 km s-1. The galactic coordinates are drawn every 20$^\circ $ in longitude as well as in latitude. The lighter line in longitude indicates l = 0$^\circ $. The gray scale code to the H I column density goes from zero (black) to about 2 1022 cm-2 (white)


  \begin{figure}\resizebox{8.8cm}{!}
{\includegraphics{ds1761f2.eps}}\end{figure} Figure 2: Same as Fig. 1 but for the whole sky. The IAR Survey has been complemented here with the northern sky survey made by Hartmann & Burton (1997)


next previous
Up: A high sensitivity H

Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)