The observations were made with the 30 m-dish of the Instituto Argentino
de Radioastronomía (IAR). They were started on June 1994 and it took
nearly 3.5 years to complete the data acquisition phase. The half power beam
width (HPBW) and the main beam efficiency at 21-cm are 30 and
0.7, respectively. The movements of the dish, (equatorial mounting) due to
constructive constraints,
are limited to -90
9
1, and
30
from
the local meridian. The dual-channel front-end consisted of helium-cooled HEM
amplifiers with a noise temperature of
20 K. The total system
temperature against cold sky was about 35 K. The backend spectral line analyzer
was the former 1008-channel autocorrelator from the Arecibo Observatory (at
present at the IAR on a long term loan basis), in its 1.6 bits sampling mode.
A bandwidth of 5 MHz was used throughout the observations, yielding a velocity
separation of 1.05
and a velocity resolution of 1.27
.
These figures
are similar to those of the Leiden/Dwingeloo survey, namely 1.03 and 1.25
,
respectively. The total spectrometer velocity coverage was thus
1056
,
centered at the radial velocity V = 0
.
In this way, besides
covering the entire velocity range expected from the overall galactic
H I-emission, all but the most extreme HVCs, and the H I emission
arising from the Magellanic System, were also observed. After the final data
reduction, the effective velocity range covered by the survey is -450
+400
,
since channels close to the edges of the
bandpass had to be dropped due to the effects of the filter that was used to
set the bandpass. All radial velocities in this paper are referred to the Local
Standard of Rest (LSR).
A total of 50980 different sky positions were observed in this work. In
order to carry out the actual data taking, the sky area to be surveyed, with
the only exception of the southern galactic pole cap, was divided in 2012
square cells 2
5 in size. Each of these cells consisted of 25 positions.
The remaining 680 positions were observed in 83 additional cells, containing
each a varying number of points. The reasons for these grouping are tied to
the limitations in the tracking capability of the antenna mentioned above and
to the integration time.
Since the total system temperature changes with galactic direction due to the
different galactic background contributions, the integration time per position
was chosen in order to reach our target rms noise of
70 mK.
Typically, at high latitudes the integration time was of the order of 210
seconds, while at low latitudes it was about 270 seconds. The so-called total
power observing mode, in its Standard Bonn Method flavour (Allen & Shostak
[1979]) was used to perform the observations.
Point | Gal. Long. | Gal. lat. | Peak
![]() |
Peak Velocity | Prof. area | Vel. range |
(K) | (
![]() |
(K
![]() |
(
![]() |
|||
IAR0(![]() |
356
![]() |
-4
![]() |
84.2 ![]() |
+5.2 | 932 | -1.5 to +15.2 |
IAR1 | 4
![]() |
-25
![]() |
44.4 ![]() |
+6.3 | 287.6 ![]() |
+0.5 to +12.0 |
IAR2 | 304
![]() |
-28
![]() |
41.1 ![]() |
+2.1 | 282.6 ![]() |
-3.6 to +7.8 |
IAR3 | 304
![]() |
-33
![]() |
46.9 ![]() |
+3.1 | 288.4 ![]() |
-2.6 to +8.9 |
IAR4 | 298
![]() |
-37
![]() |
40.6 ![]() |
+2.1 | 266.8 ![]() |
-3.6 to +7.8 |
IAR5 | 301
![]() |
-28
![]() |
33.4 ![]() |
+1.0 | 270.5 ![]() |
-4.7 to +6.8 |
IAR6 | 219
![]() |
-12
![]() |
80.9 ![]() |
+4.2 | 648.9 ![]() |
-1.5 to +9.9 |
IAR7 | 247
![]() |
+17
![]() |
64.2 ![]() |
-3.1 | 481.5 ![]() |
-8.9 to +2.6 |
IAR8 | 290
![]() |
+5
![]() |
64.3 ![]() |
-10.5 | 665.7 ![]() |
-16.2 to -4.7 |
IAR9 | 306
![]() |
+10
![]() |
57.1 ![]() |
-11.5 | 460.6 ![]() |
-17.3 to -5.8 |
IAR10 | 330
![]() |
+10
![]() |
50.6 ![]() |
+3.1 | 387.9 ![]() |
-2.6 to +8.9 |
Before undertaking the survey data taking phase, a program to determine the
telescope pointing correction was performed (Morras & Bajaja [1994]).
The resulting pointing corrections were incorporated to the observing system.
The overall pointing accuracy of the antenna was within
(
HPBW/15), for wind speeds lower than
3 m s-1. Our adopted
brightness temperature scale is tied to the point S9 (l = 356
00,
)
recommended as one of the standard fields by the IAU
(van Woerden [1970]). Due to the restrictions in the source tracking,
we have
defined a series of secondary H I calibrators. These points, whose main
characteristics are given in Table 2, were chosen in such a way that two of
them were always within the telescope horizon (Morras & Cappa [1995]).
The errors quoted in column six of Table 2, correspond to the rms value of the
mean of individual measurements. In addition, a study of the H I-distribution across our prime calibrator, region S9 (or point IAR0 in our
nomenclature), was carried out. Neutral hydrogen profiles
were observed every 0
25 (in both l and b), over a square area
of 2
0, centered on the calibration point. Williams
([1973]) obtained a value of 953
71 K
for the integral of the
brightness temperature at S9 over the velocity range -1.05 to +14.75
.
Since the
beam of the Hat-Creek telescope (HPBW
35') was slightly larger than
ours (HPBW
30'), the IAR observations were smoothed down in order to
match the angular resolution of Williams' observations. In this way the ratio
of the brightness temperature scales was found to be
(S9)/
(S9) = 1.023. Hence, the brightness temperature scale of
the IAR observations was defined in such a way as to match a mean value of
932 K
for the mentioned integral.
Regarding our "brightness temperature scale", a word of caution is necessary. Indeed, to obtain a telescope independent birghtness temperature scale (Kalberla et al. 1982) stray radiation contamination should be removed first from the calibration points observed throughout the survey. Since this has not been done yet, the figures given in Table 2, in columns fourth and sixth, may be slightly in error.
Furthermore, five cold points distributed all over the observable sky and having a very low HI emissivity, were also selected (see Table 3). Their main purpose was to estimate the stray radiation from the sidelobes which enter the cold point profiles at different LSR velocities during the observation years. This correction is expected to be applied to the entire database by Kalberla & Hartmann (1999) using a model for the antenna pattern. The procedure will be similar to the one applied to the northern H I survey. (Hartmann & Burton [1997]) with the advantage that for the construction of the model, a whole sky H I survey is now available. The modelling will be facilitated also by the equatorial mounting of the IAR dish which means that the orientation of the antenna pattern, with respect to the sky, is constant. We cannot specify in advance the effects of the stray radiation in our spectra. We can only estimate these effects on the basis of the results of the application of the correction to the northern survey which have been described in the above mentioned paper. From these results we may say that the most important effect is produced by the near sidelobes (NSL) which amounts to about of 10 to 15% of the observed intensity with a spectral distribution similar to the one produced by the main beam. The far sidelobes (FSL) add signals much more attenuated and with a spectral distribution generally not related to the main one. The effect of the FSL will be noticeable mainly far from the galactic plane, in regions where the H I signal is relativity weak.
It is worth mentioning that since our
telescope never goes below an elevation of 35,
the extinction caused by
the atmospheric air-mass column traversed by the 21-cm radiation before
reaching the telescope, has been neglected.
Usually, during a typical observing session several of our programm cells were
observed. Right before and after a given cell was observed, a calibration point
and a reference spectrum, to estimate the shape of the bandpass, were taken.
The latter was observed by shifting the central velocity of the signal-band by
+1000
.
Due to the stability of the overall system parameters,
all reference spectra of a given session were averaged, producing a new
interference-free high S/N reference spectrum, before carrying out the actual
data reduction. The latter comprises the following main steps:
The cold points were individually reduced following a similar procedure. The data reduction itself was carried out using the DRAWSPEC program (Liszt [1987]), and a local version of it, especially developed by E. Bajaja (1999) to meet the requirements of our observing scheme. Using this especially tailored program, the data reduction process was considerably speeded up.
Once a given cell was fully reduced, a minimum of three and a maximum of five
positions out of the total 25, were reobserved with a shorter integration time,
as a consistency check on the brightness temperature scale. When the reduced
profiles of this new set of observations didn't differ from the original ones
by more than 5,
the corresponding cell was included in the final survey
database. The upper limit of 5
was set for low latitude cells
(
b
60
), while for high latitude ones this criterion
was relaxed, and a higher value of 10
was adopted. This was because at
high latitudes the H I emission is usually weak and the contamination by
stray radiation could be quite different among both sets of observations,
which were usually separated by intervals of about three to nine months
from each other.
Point | Gal. Long. | Gal. lat. |
COLD1 | 11
![]() |
-59
![]() |
COLD2 |
221
![]() |
-52
![]() |
COLD3 |
233
![]() |
-27
![]() |
COLD4 |
261
![]() |
-40
![]() |
COLD5 |
347
![]() |
-75
![]() |
![]() |
Figure 2: Same as Fig. 1 but for the whole sky. The IAR Survey has been complemented here with the northern sky survey made by Hartmann & Burton (1997) |
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)