Considering these different properties, we suggest that they
do not belong to the thin disk. Firstly, they are older (10-18Gyr) than other stars. Secondly, if they are thin disk
stars, it is hard to understand why stars coming
from both sides of the solar annulus have lower metallicity than
the local region. Thirdly, these stars show a relatively
small metallicity dispersion
at such early Galactic time, i.e. smaller than stars at 8-10 Gyr.
This is not in agreement with the effect of orbital diffusion working
during the evolution of the thin disk, which
suggests larger metallicity dispersion for older stars. Finally,
the
dispersion of these stars is about 40
,
considerably larger than the typical value of about 20
for thin disk stars.
Consistently, the kinematics, age, metallicity and abundance
ratios of these stars follow the features of the thick
disk:
,
,
Gyr,
and [
/Fe]
.
We
conclude that these oldest stars in both
EAGLNT and this work are thick disk stars. Hence, they are probably
not resulting from an inside-out formation of the
Galactic disk, but have been formed in connection with
a merger of satellite components with the Galaxy.
![]() |
Figure 10:
The mean ![]() |
Concerning the abundance connection of the thick disk with the thin disk, our
data for [/Fe], shown in Fig. 10, suggest a more
smooth trend than those of EAGLNT, who found a correlation between
[
/Fe] and
at
.
We leave the issue open considering the small
number of these stars in our work. Two stars marked by their names in
Fig. 10 may be particularly interesting because they
show significantly higher [
/Fe] than other stars.
Fuhrmann & Bernkopf ([1999])
suggest that one of them, HD106516A, is a thick-disk
field blue straggler. It is unclear if this can explain
the higher [
/Fe].
HD97916 is a nitrogen rich binary (Beveridge & Sneden
[1994]) with
and
(typical for halo stars), but with
similar to the value for thin disk stars. Surprisingly,
this star is also very young (5.5 Gyr) for it's metallicity.
It is interesting to re-inspect the observational results
for thin disk stars excluding the thick disk stars.
More direct information on
the evolution of the Galactic thin disk will be then obtained. In summary,
the thin disk
is younger (not older than 12 Gyr), more metal-rich
(
)
and has a smaller [
/Fe] spread (0.1 dex)
without the mixture of the thick disk stars. In
particular, the AMR is more weak and there seems to exist a radial
metallicity gradient. All these features agree better with the present
evolutionary models for the Galactic disk.
We emphasize here that there is no obvious
gradient in [/Fe] for
the thin disk at a given metallicity. Such a gradient was
suggested by EAGLNT based on higher [
/Fe] of the
oldest stars with
kpc than stars with
kpc
(see their Fig. 21). After we have ascribed these oldest
stars to the thick disk, the abundance gradient disappears.
Our study of relative abundance ratios as a function of
suggests that there are subtle differences of origin and enrichment history
both within the group of
elements and the iron-peak elements.
Nucleosynthesis theory predicts that Si and
Ca are partly synthesized in SNe Ia, while O and Mg are only
produced in SNe II (Tsujimoto et al. [1995]).
Our data suggest, however,
that SNe Ia may also be a significant synthesis site of Mg, because [Mg/Fe]
shows a trend more similar to [Si/Fe] and [Ca/Fe] than to [O/Fe].
Ti may not lie in
a smooth extension of Si and Ca, because there is a hint of a
decrease of [Ti/Fe] for
not seen in the case of Si and Ca.
The situation for the odd-Z elements is more complicated.
The available data for Na and Al show confusing disagreements; EAGLNT
finds an overabundance of 0.1 to 0.2 dex for [Na/Fe] and [Al/Fe]
among the metal-poor disk stars, whereas our study points at solar
ratios. Two other odd-Z elements, K and Sc (Nissen et al. [2000]),
behave like
elements, but the result for K is sensitive to the
assumption of LTE.
The iron-peak elements also show different behaviours: V, Cr and Ni
follow Fe very well, while [Mn/Fe] (Nissen et al. [2000])
decreases with decreasing metallicity from [Mn/Fe]
at
to [Mn/Fe]
at
.
We conclude that the terms "
elements'' and "iron-peak
elements'' do not indicate productions in single processes,
and that each element seems to have a unique enrichment history.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Danish Research Academy and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Bengt Edvardsson is thanked for providing a grid of the Uppsala new MARCS model atmospheres, and Birgitta Nordström for communicating CORAVEL radial velocities in advance of publication.
Copyright The European Southern Observatory (ESO)